Looking at how #LLM are promoted by their fans, I've come to the conclusion:

Pretty much everyone from a #STEM background - myself definitely included! - owes the #Humanities a huge apology.

I mean, I get it. When I was a young student of physics, it was easy for me to sneer at philosophy students and whatnot. After all, _we_ dealt with hard, measurable facts, while _those_ people dealt with some weird thought constructs that had no relevancy to the real world - right?

But this is the end result - #TechBro culture and a vast portion of our entire economy using digital bullshit generators instead of critical thinking, and using this to lead us into a fascist future where either Truth or Facts have become meaningless.

Mea culpa.

@juergen_hubert yes to all this. We need to expand our emotional intelligence before anymore technology advancement or we may be looking at extinction

@sensitivityi I am a bit leery of the term "emotional intelligence", especially since it builds on dubious concepts like IQ.

But we all need more awareness of our own emotional responses and develop critical thinking to identify our own biases.

@juergen_hubert two places I would love to expand our collective awareness: we have an amazing ability to adapt to our environment but this ability can also be destructive in a toxic society. Also, beliefs. How is our belief system affecting us all and what are the opportunities for empowerment and what is further disempowering us re belief system?
@juergen_hubert LLMs are a neat tool to help with smaller tasks, writing a few lines of code for me.
That some firms try to automate entire jobs seems alot to ask from such a fresh tool.
The fact people argue and talk like with a person on the phone is what worries me.
People already lose themselfs in this techno world, now you can replace talking partners with a bot that praises me in every sentence.
I want to be praises by a goth girl
@juergen_hubert wait there, not all #Humanities are progressive and "humanistic". Tech-bro culture has its own backing in several streams of "libertarian-conservative" theorists and writers (plus of course the traditional conservative theory, that can be stretched a bit to adapt to tech authoritarianism...)
@juergen_hubert this isn’t limited to tech bros. Its root is misogyny.
@juergen_hubert This xkcd-comic is too true: https://xkcd.com/1831/
Here to Help

xkcd
@juergen_hubert When I was in on our science student council, we got Faculty to include one first year humanities course as a prerequisite for a science degree.
Very few graduates, in retrospect, felt that it was a waste of time.

@juergen_hubert

👆🏼 Need more people like this good guy.
Not just for a mea culpa, because the change and maturation of a person matters. I had a similar progression in life.

Also, https://bijou.substack.com/p/nexus-of-neuronheads?r=3hsqj

Nexus of Neuronheads

Nazi enablers are all around the ivory towers and computer labs

Ohanga Pai
@SmithWillSuffice A good essay, although the constant misspelling of "Weimar" as "Wiemar" was irritating.

@juergen_hubert You can relax. A major movement in the #Humanities argued for half a century that Truth and Facts were meaningless.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Postmodern_philosophy

#academia

Postmodern philosophy - Wikipedia

@mrundkvist ...are you sure? From what I understand, they have argued against universal "truths", but not against facts as such.

But then again, I am not a philosopher by training. #philosophy

@juergen_hubert This was not a movement primarily among philosophers, but was widely fashionable among all kinds of humanities scholars in the 80s and 90s. I mainly encountered it in my own discipline, #archaeology. There was a widespread attitude or pose that the concept of a scientific fact was politically and philosophically naïve.

#academia

@juergen_hubert @mrundkvist Yeah, this typically PoMo criticism fells always short. This is a really great book that tries to inform the reader what those 'postmodern' thinkers were trying to do and which thoughts came before those guys. Recommended for this whole discussion.

@wackJackle @juergen_hubert

I don't wan't to know *more* about pomo philosophy. Or about philosophy at all. I wish it had never been my misfortune to encounter it in my archaeological work.

@mrundkvist @juergen_hubert Then maybe stop with your uninformend broad criticism which won't stand up against a book like this!? Just saying.
@juergen_hubert the most effective Doctors I worked with were ones with a wide background. They had skill to diagnose, but also to communicate the diagnosis/options to patients who had vastly different backgrounds and knowledge levels. Both pieces matter.
@juergen_hubert maybe i misunderstand you here, but i reject the idea that technological progress leads to fascism. technology may act as an amplifier for tendencies, that already exist in society.

@condret I am not saying that technological progress leads to fascism.

However, technological progress causes social change - and without the Humanities to understand this social change, it's easy to fall into the traps of fascism.

@juergen_hubert Damn. Great statement and so true. Respect.

@juergen_hubert this thread hits close to home for me. My Bachelor's is in Physics, but towards the end I developed a fascination for how things were discovered, and took a course in History of Physics, and then wrote my dissertation on it.

My fellow students were quite dismissive, thinking that I took an easy way out and "history of physics" was a cheap subject. "Almost humanities".

I am very happy about what I learned, and gave me better chances of survival in case of accidental time travel, and tools to make my historical rpg more accurate, but most of all it taught me the receiving point of view of this kind of dismissiveness.

(Not of pride: I got a prize from the Italian association for the history of physics and astronomy for my thesis)

@juergen_hubert I come from the computational linguistics community, so I saw the #LLMs being born. For me, the real split is not between STEM and Humanities but between Engineering and Science (I put the Humanities in the latter).

There was always a tension in my community between people who wanted to 'get things to work' (the engineers), and people who wanted to understand human language (the scientists). Money and influence were always on the engineers' side, sadly.

@juergen_hubert
And the Berlin Senate is proposing to cut down the humanities faculty at @tuberlin arguing it is not necessary...
https://wisskomm.social/@tuberlin/114037409222224943
Technische Universität Berlin (@[email protected])

#TUBerlin-Präsidentin Geraldine Rauch reagiert auf Äußerungen von Berlins Wissenschaftssenatorin Ina Czyborra: In einem Interview hatte diese die TU-Fakultät I für Geistes- & Bildungswissenschaften als „Doppelangebot“ bezeichnet & deren Bedeutung infrage gestellt. Geraldine Rauch zeigt sich darüber „höchst irritiert“ und betont die Bedeutung der geistes- & sozialwissenschaftlichen Angebote an der TU Berlin. ℹ️ Jetzt das Statement lesen: https://www.tu.berlin/go277297/n66142/ #SaveBrainCity

Wissenschaft trötet
@juergen_hubert As someone who studied humanities (philosophy, minors in language and history) but with a lifelong interest in STEM, I think it's critical that everyone be thoroughly educated with a foundational understanding of *both* humanities and natural sciences.

@juergen_hubert We see a ton of problems from people with STEM tunnel vision play out in society, I suspect due to the close alignment of corporate interests with a lot of the STEM processes used in industry.

But I've seen cases where humanities tunnel vision causes trouble, sometimes by robbing people of the techniques to unpick misinformation, sometimes by lulling people into a sense that the material world is a mere inert thing that humans act upon, without structures or dynamism of its own.

@juergen_hubert I will never forget the argument I had with a political science grad who insisted that vaccines only prevented disease because Big Pharma's advertising campaigns were so powerful they reshaped our brains to function with vaccines in order to uphold their profit motive, and that we should all denounce and refuse vaccination so that our collective conscious would return us to a pre-industrial state where we are naturally immune to pathogens.

@juergen_hubert That being said, most of our most pressing social problems right now can be associated with STEM tunnel vision that neglects or denies the conversations and work that happens in humanities, so I think putting the focus there right now is worthwhile.

Fundamentally, I think processes that have split "humanities" and "STEM" into a binary are a root problem we need to address, and that interdisciplinarity and broad foundational education are critical for our collective well-being.

@juergen_hubert
i agree with you generally, but i think you're being a bit too kind to academic philosophy

a lot of it *is* bullshit, entire departments and subdisciplines are ruled by self-aggrandizing careerists with zero interest in "critical thinking"

this much has been incredibly obvious in the way that powerful and influential figures have flexed their muscles to defend "philosophical" transphobia and other reactionary hogwash against all analysis and critique

@juergen_hubert
as much as silicon valley is full of intellectually-hothoused "autodidacts" who've fallen in with the rationalist cult, the humanities and social sciences have also barfed forth numerous reactionary dipshits and crypto-fascists who happily march alongside them

@juergen_hubert Honestly, as a former humanities student, I've come to believe that students of the humanities were pulled in two directions:

A) Pursuing genuine interest and concern with the complexities and contradictions in organized knowledge and the human experience;

B) Faced with impossibly long reading lists and requirements, learning to produce authoritative-sounding bullshit.

STEM students often failed to perceive A but were right to criticize B.

@juergen_hubert

As a science graduate and failed Postgrad
-I understood that many of the most important issues don't rely on *scientific questions* although they are sometimes illuminated by science
-science helps us understand why and how we are here, but not the why
-I never denigrated the humanities
-as a science communicator I realised there's false view of science as a priesthood of the arcana, which many scientists seek to dispel

@juergen_hubert Seriously. We have a lot to answer for. Biologist here, so not quite as hard a science as physics, but we too would sit around and joke that the most hopeless students should go into journalism.

We _thought_ we were being discreet and out of earshot but they obviously heard us. And since neither they nor we had a clue about the smarts needed for journalism, here we are.