Everything about this story is terrifying, but the cherry on this shit sundae is that they are pushing changes directly to prod.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/musk-cronies-dive-into-treasury-dept-payments-code-base
Everything about this story is terrifying, but the cherry on this shit sundae is that they are pushing changes directly to prod.
https://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/musk-cronies-dive-into-treasury-dept-payments-code-base
@evacide @mattblaze You can see how rudimentary his code is. He finally added shell scripts to do linting.
@emenel @madopal @evacide @mattblaze
Lordy lordy, this cannot be real. Please tell me this isn't real.
It's the Seek in DeepSeek which seems like it could be somewhat problematic.
Something needs to be commited.
I linked DOGE staffer Marko Elez to a deleted X account that advocated repealing the Civil Rights Act, backed a “eugenic immigration policy,” and wrote, “You could not pay me to marry outside of my ethnicity." He just resigned. https://www.wsj.com/tech/doge-staffer-resigns-over-racist-posts-d9f11a93 https://www.wsj.com/tech/doge-staffer-resigns-over-racist-posts-d9f11a93?mod=Searchresults_pos1&page=1
The only thing Muskrat is good at is blowing smoke up Trump's arse. Where it's welcomingly received.
Interesting! Thanks for the link!
That quote is going straight into the bible of my future new religion******
* With attribution of course
** I'm not actually writing a bible
*** I'm not actually starting a religion
It is extraordinarily disappoint to see smart people get caught up in the mob frenzy of "technology/ technologists = bad", when the issue of "privileged cunts who have never had to suffer the consequences of their mistakes due to money, and therefore never learned from the occasions, yet use money as a weapon against the rest of us" slides right by, because the same cunts have become experts at dividing (attentions, narratives, and) populations against each other with fucking daft false equivalences
One of the confusing things about reality is that the same outcomes can occur by different motivations
People who did a thing "because x" easily assume others did the same thing "because x", as opposed to other (arbitrarily different) motivations. (but it happens all the time of course)
In this way, criticism directed at an individuals motivation, due to coincidental (though non-causal) alignment of some outcome, is false equivalence (and also daft in this case, as a quick look into my background would make it very clear that i have no idea what an "internet savvy point" even is... anyway)
You do make my point though
This is a classic example of pedantic bs distracting from the root cause of the shit show we're all in
If competency coding (or whatever) is a result of "care and consideration over time", then that same care and consideration over time, applied to arbitrarily different domains, is transferable. And after a while, many of the same patterns of circumstances, process and progress, become clear across pursuits. We're all doing "mostly the same stuff", albeit differently arranged and presented, in different play-pens. Yes there are difference, but not absolute differences, all are relative.
There are plenty of individuals competent at a plurality of pursuits, who may have developed confidence in one, which helped them succeed at another
The problem is not coders (or tech in the broader conversation of the moment)
In fact, let's temporarily veto all blame of "others exhausted by care and consideration over time"
We're all on the same fucking side
Our problem is the class of individuals who "took a punt" and got lucky, (and who are bailed out when they aren't lucky), who act without care and consideration over time
I don't doubt either of your motivation, but can we focus on the fucking baddies pls?
@evacide @mattblaze I'm not good at politics, my area of expertise involves computer security. I don't expect politicians to solve computer security problems because they are not qualified. They simply should try to get better at picking the best for the job - without picking the ones who will benefit them the most in the short term. Same goes for politics - I should not try to fix it, but simply get better at picking the best person for the job.
This is a classic example of bringing a hammer to fix the problem and treating every problem like a nail. Except without testing the hammer. Or the nail. Or paying attention how thick the wood is vs how long the nail is.
@evacide This thing with claiming there are 150-year-olds receiving social security because they don't know an 1875 date serves as an undefined/error code in COBOL.
Like, I don't expect most people to know COBOL. I don't know COBOL.
But I DO know that if you see the same weird value repeated over and over in a data set, it means something, and if you don't know what, you ask somebody who does. @mattblaze