Meanwhile, Meta creates fake AI-created profiles for engagement on Facebook and Instagram. Here is an example of how it looks. Guess what? You can’t block these AI profiles. They are so stupid and want to get rid of humans. All this so they can avoid paying the 1000 bucks they pay to top influencers monthly. The most dystopian shit ever

@nixCraft we don't have to concerned about this on #Mastodon. Although someone could develop the code , it would never be accepted at the repository level, let alone at the network level.

This is one of the reasons why Mastodon and #TheFediverse is very important

@nicholasr @nixCraft I don't think that's true. The code is already there, since Mastodon has an API that people can (and do!) use for bots. Using that for an AI persona, instead of, say, Picard insights, is a small step.

There's also the aspect that believing you're not vulnerable for something makes you inherently vulnerable for that thing because you let your guard down.

And third, just because something is open source does not mean that the code is rigidly reviewed.

@codingphysicist @nixCraft and I very much agree with you that developers and security experts have to always be aware of CVE. However there is some software that is just better designed and less vulnerable.

I 100% agree that #OpenSource does not = secure. However, if an open source project is very popular, used, and actively developed, then open source does have an advantage over proprietary