This thing is such an advertisement for Apple Silicon though, not an apples to apples comparison but my M1 Mac mini idles at 5W, this Mac Pro idles at 150W 💀
https://mastodon.social/@christianselig/113596540228146555
@christianselig pretty sad they abandoned the form factor. Got nothing against the Mac Studio but it’s just another rounded corner box.
@christianselig at one of my old jobs, we had one of these. It was very cool to look at, I thought. And at the time it felt like an absolute power house. Funny now how modern Macs run rings around it with far less energy.
@christianselig To be _fair_, it's an advertisement for not using Xeon. Those things are server/workstation chips — power draw was literally at the bottom of the list of priorities.
@ikenndac Yeah that's why I said not apples to apples, a better comparison would be the chip in the current Apple Silicon Mac Pro
@christianselig (And a decade of advancement in technology)
@ikenndac I might be wrong but I don't think modern Intel chips that would be destined for the Mac Pro put the same emphasis on power efficiencies that Apple's own chips do

@christianselig Well, no - Apple’s chips came up through the iPhone, where power efficiency > everything else.

That said, the Apple Silicon Mac Pro is one of the worst computers Apple has ever shipped - I don’t know why they bothered putting an Apple Silicon chip in that form factor. It’s missing a ton of workstation features that the form factor is designed for.

@ikenndac That I can't speak to haha, I'm just impressed by the power efficiency improvements
@ikenndac @christianselig I think it is the GPUs. I have another Ivy Bridge Xeon and it uses way less than my trash can at idle.
@christianselig I think it’s more like 80W, no way it’s actually idle at 150.
@paul I hit sleep and 5 minutes later my kill a watt is fluctuating between 120 and 180W. Maybe it just takes awhile to fully calm down versus the Mac mini over the same period
@christianselig are you running a supported OS or using that Legacy Patcher thing? I think the patcher nukes all the power saving stuff.
@paul It's just on stock Monterey
@christianselig weird, it for sure should be lower than that and actual sleep should be < 5W.
@paul I guess it depends how we’re defining idle. It’s seemingly gone into a deep sleep mode where it’s taking about 3W now finally but it seems like anything remotely preventing that makes it consume a ton more, presumably like an idle Plex server
@christianselig yeah for sure it'll do that, I remember just watching a YouTube video would have it shoot up > 100W.
@christianselig those devices are not accurate when measuring PSUs at idle due to the bad power factor
@p4block Are you talking like AC to DC conversion loss? That should be like 10% not multiples
@christianselig no, killawatts literally cannot measure a PSU that is drawing single digit w specially a desktop one, they go haywire. There was a reddit thread about this not long ago but I can't find it again
@p4block oh interesting, I’ll keep that in mind then thank ya! It does seem to be handling the Mac mini fine though
@christianselig @paul My 12-core w/ 64GB idles ~75 on Windows 11. Got a few Linux VMs running on there.
@john @paul Yeah looks like mine works its way down to about 80-100W eventually
@christianselig I would LOVE a M1 version of this machine, it’s so beautiful
@christianselig That's because it's 30 times more beautiful.
@christianselig Has anyone shoved an M-series chip into one of these things? They're putting them in the iMac G4 "lamp" so surely this is also a thing?
Timo Hetzel (@[email protected])

Attached: 2 images @[email protected] it fits!

Mastodon
@christianselig @timo LOL! Not what I had in mind, but technically what I was asking for 🤣
@pvanb @christianselig you could stack a bunch of them in there. Or print a vertical stand to place it in the cutout I guess.
@christianselig It would be wild if Apple revisited some of their classic form factors but with Apple Silicon... iMac G4, Cube, Trashcan…
@christianselig so they can unpaint themselves from their thermal corner and just reuse the case?

@yertle @christianselig how much of them choosing not to use that case is

• it was never a good thermal design

vs.

• it was, but the product was so poorly received they don’t want to risk the association

@christianselig I really do also believe that this was designed, (as were the > 2016 MacBooks) on the back of promises from Intel about die shrinks and power savings. I also still strongly believe that had they been paired with a tower they would have been far more acceptable. (Cf G4 Cube & G4 tower; Mac Studio & Mac Pro tower)
@john Great point, would love to have seen that alternate universe