"So I'm just supposed to let a person who looks like a man in a dress go into the women's bathroom??"

Yes literally yes. It blows my mind that people still do not understand this. There are zero instances of a person doing this with criminal malicious intent. Public bathrooms are for the public. That means even sharing it with people whose exact shape, size, and color of their genitals could be a mystery to you. You are not the crotch police.

Don't like that? Then fucking pee at home.

@Lana
Most people who suffer from this will be cis.
@Lana Add to this that when folk start trying to make snap decisions about who's a man in a dress, we inevitably get a lot of false positives. This is, at the very least, traumatizing for the targets of these accusations.

@Lana What should be banned in bathrooms is behaviour, such as assault, harrassment, abuse, and if people really insist perhaps indecent exposure outside of the stalls.

Basically, all things that aren't or shouldn't be allowed anywhere anyway.

But I guess 'they' would then want to implement that as 'constantly watched security cams everywhere in the bathroom', and that'd not be great either.

If only people could just be decent to each other...

@wynke @Lana I love bringing this up because it shows that there was no “safety” concern and it was just transphobia,

legit the second you offer a solution to the imaginary problem that isn’t “ban trans people from existing” they just immediately begin making it extremely obvious that’s what it was really about .. it’s so funny

Also worth noting: cameras don’t stop abusive stuff it’s a promise to do more of it to anyone who they see doing it, by whatever definition of abusive they have, like on top of what was already done,

and of course it’s a bathroom (honestly it’s kinda invasive anywhere but especially there) so having cameras recording anyone is itself abusive

@Lana transgender folks are just looking to be happy within their own body, not rape a bunch of kids with epstein, 96 felonies, or being a yt supremacist, protecting dchool shootings as a concept, or bringing back child marriage, or anything like that.

The bathroom debate is just their ridiculous way to conflate two insecuriities into an unlikely, false virtue trigger point.

@Lana are we really still stuck an "person who looks like a man in a dress" as if a visual check like that had any validity even if it didn't have a failure rate above 50%
@mitsunee @Lana
We really, really are still stuck there.
It is so important to terrorise trans and nonbinary people, that they are willing to endanger "real" (in their words/opinions) women. Bathroom bans get more cis women attacked than trans, because there just are a lot more cis women, and some of them look a bit "manly".
So they go under the bus with us.
@silvermoon82 exactly what I meant to say with that. the same bullshit harassment also happens elsewhere, idk if I'd want to be successful as a female athlete right now for example...
@Lana THE CROTCH POLICE. LMFAO

@Lana

The words "you are not the crotch police" cost me a mouthful of coffee.

Totally worth it.

Also, stickers when?

@Lana I still want to question why we are not moving towards gender neurral bathrooms? All stalls? Then it doesn't matter what you are doing or how.

Our office has then, and marked as "gender neutral" not some odd male/female symbol. It says to me that they are just for people who need to dispose of bodily waste.

Oh, and they have sanitary products available and clearly on view. Which is lovely to see.

You are supposed to let people use toilets. As they need. Also, it is people who want to make these quick decisions who we need to be saved form. Because the most dangerous people are the white male supremacists.

Not people who wear dresses.

@SteveClough @Lana One-person unisex loos are fine, as are family rooms with diaper changing stations, but the value of multiperson women's rooms includes being able to get away from violent men and be safe long enough to tell someone else or make a phone call, etc. (or the nicety of being able to repair your appearance without a companion watching). I've needed to get away from men many times but have never had an issue with LGBTQ women.
@SteveClough @Lana my favorite bars in Maine just have bathrooms. Non specific hey this is the pee room don’t care bathrooms.
@SteveClough @Lana
In the absence of urinals I’m sure there would be “manly men” who decide their only option is to *climb up on the toilet* and pee downward. No sitting! Ever!!

@SteveClough @Lana Agreed! It’s tough with existing construction that might have rooms with rows of urinals, but for new construction, just build rooms with one toilet each and call it a day.

That single-occupancy privacy also benefits cisgendered people who shouldn’t have ordered the extra-extra-hot wings the night before and may or may not be me.

@Lana Today I used the (unisex) loo in a municipal venue and thought of this row spreading through the anglophone world. Shame my phone was turned off for the concert so I couldn't take a photo of the smallish open area containing two cubicles (one wheelchair-friendly), a washbasin and hand-dryer, and a urinal.

@Lana And then there are women like me, older, post-menopausal, who look like men (I like loose floppy button shirts and pants and often get greeted by cashiers as "sir"). I would never imagine walking into a men's public restroom, but I'm sure there are women who have wondered about me as I walk into "their" restroom.

I can see that this snap decision-making is not going to go well. Kind of like the cashiers who fall all over themselves with apologies after they hear my voice. Meanwhile, my attitude is, why even make the distinction? It's not really necessary. Just say, "hello," and leave it at that.

@ELS Ah, but that's where the segregation becomes critical. In men's toilets, you see, it's considered rude to greet one's fellow peers.

 

@Lana

@Lana

I just don’t understand why the hypothetical man in their minds who wants to go into the women’s toilet to assault women would bother putting on a dress first 🤷‍♂️

@Lana They can always pee in the street.

@Lana

I estimate that at least half of the public bathrooms or toilets in work places are unisex in #Sweden. Who cares? How can this even be a political issue in the #USA? Pearl clutching snow flakes, made up problems.

@projektionsyta @Lana as if their bathrooms at home aren't unisex.
@projektionsyta @Lana Honestly, I think it is one of those bizarre things that's left over from Puritan days. No one knows why we do it this way, there's really no good reason for it, and yet here we are.
@Lana I would pretty confidently assume the guys who obsess over this look at other men’s junk while standing at urinals

@Lana "Don't like that? Then fucking pee at home."

In what is, presumably, a gender-neutral/unisex toilet!

@Lana there are no incidents of a trans person in a bathroom assaulting people. Unlike Trumps cabinet picks. Funny how sexual assaulters project their fantasies onto other people.

did i already tell you my story of pretending i knew a trans lady so she could go into the bathroom with me while we talked because there were Karens everywhere and she looked nervous going in? she was older too and i totally felt that in my bones as being Dx autistic at 50. she looked like she was still trying to find her style and feel comfortable in her own skin.

so i locked my arm with hers, we went did our thing, chatted a bit, she thanked me profusely & we went our ways… 1/2

@Lana

have never seen her again but been thinking a lot about her. i hope she is ok. i hope she is thriving, you know?

and i've been thinking recently: you know how Planned Parenthood had chaperones for their abortion clinics?

we're gonna need to have something like a pin or a band or something to show trans folk we'll chaperone them to a bathroom or a dressing room in a store, whatever.

we're gonna need bathroom liberation squads. 2/2

@Lana

@blogdiva @Lana I wanted to do something like that a while back, I know it isn’t much my smartwatch band is a rainbow (so is my phone strap). Would trans colors be more helpful?

Sorry in advance if this is offensive (you can let me know)

@farah @blogdiva @Lana the colors are helpful because the danger with these things is always that they wind up being adopted only by the people who are interested in performative self-congratulation and not in actually taking action to intervene, which puts people in danger by promising safety that does not materialize. >

@farah @blogdiva @Lana

wearing the colors comes at a social cost because bystanders can tell what it signals support for, so in the safety assessment of someone trying to decide who to trust, it's more likely to be real.

@farah @blogdiva @Lana oh. well. that got styled as a blockquote, heh. computers.
@ireneista
@farah @blogdiva
My preferred accessory to signal that I'm willing to take public actions in support of marginalized people against right-wing talking points: a covid mask. Could even get a sheet of trans stickers to slap on there if you want to be extra clear. But yeah, trans people have some of the highest rates of long covid https://longcovidjustice.org/trans/
Long COVID is a trans issue – Long COVID Justice

@blogdiva @Lana This is actually the kind of thing they tell you to do in bystander intervention training: if someone is being harassed (or something like that) by bigots, you pretend to know them, chat with them, walk them to safety, etc

@blogdiva @Lana OK, I always make fun of the mandatory online HR training we have to complete each year, but I have to admit, the bystander training has some good stuff in it.

Also, good on you for coming to that person's aid!

@Lana If people are having trouble with what's going with the genitalia of the person in the next stall, they're not bathrooming correctly.

@Lana I mean if they were actually BATHrooms, maybe some issues. But we're taking about toilet spaces. And I feel safe in saying that these spaces have one-person stalls with doors, and that the doors have latches on the inside.

Are we supposed to be getting outraged about sounds we hear? That we hear through the bathroom door at home?

@Bodling @Lana my college dorm (30+ years ago) had coed bathrooms. With showers (private stall showers but shared sinks etc). Not every dorm on campus then did this and it was unusual - but it also wasn’t a problem. Even with college freshmen. We all quickly adapted (and were happy not to have to go up or down stairs to bathrooms on other floors as was the usual solution in other dorms with only one bathroom on a floor)

@Lana

I have often used the "Men's" when the line at the "Ladies" is too long, without incident
will that be changing now that people are so gender crazy?

@Lana I agree with your intention behind this post.

However, I do want to mention this example, which I found interesting:

After Danish politicians allowed legal document sex changes, Danish provocateur artist Ibi-Pippi reregistered as a woman.

Going to jail for destroying art at a museum, she requested to serve in a women's only prison. This was denied by the state, allegedly because she lives like a man, and she has previously served time for crimes against women.

@randahl @Lana the prison complaint is an interesting one because it is an example of a completely different phenomenon. The prison system does not reduce crime, it moves it into the prison system, and people seem that acceptable because the crime is now being done to people who 'deserve' it. Transphobes have simply chosen a subset of these that support their agenda and act like it's unacceptable while the others are expected and normal. In reality they are all equally indicative of various societal failures, and none call for enforcing transphobia.
@Lana instead, they'll be complaining about the woman in a dress in the men's bathroom who is (according to conservatives) a man.

@Lana nodds in agreement

What if I told you that a lot of public restrooms ain't even gender-segregated but just a loo, a sink, some adjacient stuff and that's it.

@Lana used to work at a nightclub for alt/indie/goth folk.

Separate male/female facilities. Mostly nobody gave a fuck and just went where the queue was smallest, though there was a specific cubicle which, through some kind of unspoken community consensus, became the place where you go to snort your cheap speed.

That was a very clean, low maintenance cubicle,

@drunkenmadman @Lana saw this crashing of gender boundaries at toilets (and the drug use) a lot on the rave scene in the 2000s..
@Lana As long as folks wash their hands, it's all good with me. That's your real public safety concern

@Lana I don't see a problem with bathrooms (ment as toilets) as everybody poops and shits pretty much same and rule of thumb says you do not look at other guys wiener when peeing 😀

What I do see problematic though (no transphobia, just practical problem) is, that women might have few issues with someone at public (for example pool) showers, who has hanging multi-use tool like I do.

But I'm saying this from male perspective who never (knowingly) met a trans person in corner-case like this.

@schmaker public showers are for the public. If you are inspecting other people's crotches in a public space, YOU are the one doing the illegal/immoral thing.

@Lana No need for the aggressive tone, I don't really care, but social conventions expect wiener-equipped people in one room and pussy-equipped in another.

Even though I don't care I still can imagine why can someone feel uncomfortable when this convention is broken.

I guess we wouldn't have this discussion if someone a long time ago would not have an idea about splitting the rooms. Shame on him! 😀

@schmaker don't tone police me. I won't ask a second time.

@Lana I do not see any tone policing, it was just a friendly reminder that people tend to act like assholes to people, who acts like assholes to them. And I'm not about to reach that level as Fediverse is way too friendly place for it 😀

This discussion leads nowhere, so I wish you a nice day instead