FroyokSo Ombre development enters its third year this month, so let's start a new thread to track the progress !
I spent the past few days reworking my Depth of Field, which started off the GPU Zen method and then evolved a bit.
The part I'm currently trying to figure out is how to make the effect "scale-up", aka resolution independent.
Since the kernel is computed on the fly from a function, I should be able to find a formula to adjust it based on a resolution reference (so via a ratio or something). 🤔
Since the kernel is computed on the fly from a function, I should be able to find a formula to adjust it based on a resolution reference (so via a ratio or something). 🤔
My bokeh pass shader on Linux has a little issue it seems. For some reason it result in my pass taking 0.7ms, but if I increase the number of samples it actually goes down !
Switching to Vulkan or another shader compiler fix the problem. That was a fun one to investigate. :p
Switching to Vulkan or another shader compiler fix the problem. That was a fun one to investigate. :p
While trying some different bokeh radius, I thought of scaling up/down the render targets resolution and it worked without changing anything... this means I could have dynamic resolution scaling !
Here is 1080p x 2, aka 4K.
That's basically SSAA(2x) ? :D
Still hitting 80 FPS, but the post-process stack and shadow volumes are getting quite expensive at that resolution.
That's basically SSAA(2x) ? :D
Still hitting 80 FPS, but the post-process stack and shadow volumes are getting quite expensive at that resolution.
(Some stuff is broken obviously, like the tiny and wrongly placed viewport axis.)
I made an in-editor tweak to change the resolution, this way I could try out different bokeh sizes and sample count.
That made it easier to figure out how to make the bokeh stable across different resolutions. (My bloom isn't it however, so I will have to look into it.)
So the past few weeks I have been working on my refraction implementation and I'm finally starting to get some good results. I also added absorption which is going to be nice for liquids and colored glass.
I'm struggling with a specific point however. I have read that glass IOR should be around 1.5 for example, but when I use such value then I get this kind of double layering:
I tried looking around, to see if I was missing some notion, but even with a simple shadertoy I get the same result: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/ttBBWz
Same with this one, IOR of 1.5 gives the same warping/duplicated result: https://www.shadertoy.com/view/4lB3D1
So it was juts a silly bug, I had the IOR for the Material and the Air swapped around, so I had the wrong value. 😅
Alright, with that last new feature in I backed the project up and I can now increment the engine version. That's a good milestone. :)
So initially I was thinking of jumping onto Steam Audio as the next topic, but recent discussions are now tempting me more to go into Global illumination instead. 👀
Not sure which method I want to dive into yet. I have been gathering information about different methods (Light Propagation Volume, Distance Field, Voxels) but I'm still hesitating on which one would fit best my needs.
DDGI is another potential solution, but building and updating a BVH is not necessarily something I would like to do. 🤔
After spending quite a bit of time digging into GI methods I decided to implement Voxel Cone Tracing.
Now the challenge I'm facing is about how to voxelize the scene.
Now the challenge I'm facing is about how to voxelize the scene.
One common approach is to exploit the GPU rasterizer to store directly into the voxels the position and colors via the fragment shader execution for each triangles of a mesh.
The framework I use doesn't support it unfortunately.
The framework I use doesn't support it unfortunately.
So two alternative are possible: slice rendering (re-render the scene with small near/far for each voxel slice) or compute based rasterizing.
Slices on paper look expensive, because you have to re-render the same meshes for each voxel along an axis, then do that 3 times for each world axis (to ensure you don't miss face aligned to an axis).
I read about tricks based on instanced rendering and all, but that still seem a bit overkill because while looking around I found an interesting paper.
The "Optimizing Surface Voxelization for Triangular Meshes with Equidistant Scanlines and Gap Detection" paper !
It's not directly compute raster which is nice, and the performance noted look promising.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cgf.15195
It's not directly compute raster which is nice, and the performance noted look promising.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/cgf.15195
Sylvain Meunier@froyok Radiance Cascades from Path of Exile 2 looks trendy... ^^
@meuns PoE2 Radiance Cascade only works for screen space stuff, the world space version is a lot more costly (and folks are still working on it). I'm looking for cheaper stuff, even if less precise. :)
@froyok a global illumination method from the trenches https://youtu.be/57F1ezwH7Mk?si=SQo0sdtTuDx8n1mv
Realtime Global Illumination in Enshrouded
@meuns Yeah saw that one already, but seems way too complicated for my brain :p
LR@froyok i wasn't gonna make a recommendation, but i wanted to mention that i've implemented LPV before and I had a lot of fun with it. it's the default lighting method in Media Molecule's Dreams. but it is quite low-freq.
something I always wanted to try is LPV within a tetrahedrally segmented volume
@lritter What would be the benefit of the Tetra volume ?
@froyok a while back ubisoft released a paper on detecting self-collisions in dynamic tetrahedral volumes (aka simplex volumes), and there was another paper that used simplex volumes as accelerator for raytracing. it has going for itself that it is a good fit for anisotropic data, and that it is single-structure unlike multilevel octrees.
for LPV, you'd get prec around high res details, avoid ipol interfacts since simplices align with surf tris & save cost of propagating across empty space.
@lritter I see, interesting. 🤔
Tom Forsyth@froyok aha. Yes, you'll be getting some total internal reflection if you swap the densities!
Clément Foucault@froyok The refraction function takes a ratio of IOR with source IOR over destination IOR. So for air to something that has IOR 1.5 it would be 1/1.5.
What you are seeing in your examples is the Snell's window (typically seen underwater).
@fclem Okay, you made me check my code again and I just noticed I had the Air/Material IOR flipped around. 😅
Hugo Devillers