Poll for people outside the US:

If you have cloud data or e-mails stored by US companies like Dropbox, Google, Microsoft, Amazon, etc., will you feel safe keeping your data this way if Trump is reelected?

Please boost so we can get many replies.

Yes, that is safe
7.5%
No, that is not safe
92.5%
Poll ended at .
@randahl Honestly, no, it's not that safe. But it's not dependent on Trump, it's just generally expected that American agencies are watching everything.

@randahl
Voted ‘yes’, but ‘safe’ is a relative term. I would prefer them in Europe but Europe sucks at this kind of big tech companies. I do prefer it to China by a lot.

The thing with America, is that you are open to all that America is open to exploit, but you are protected from everything else in the world. We need America to be a stronger government.

@randahl It is not even safe today.
@randahl TBH, letting any organisation ,whose sole motivation is profit, retain your data is unsafe.

@randahl ultimately safe software doesn’t exist anywhere in the world. I respect the efforts of those who fight for privacy, but personally I just have accepted that there is no privacy in modern world.

Would, in my opinion, re-election of Trump decrease the safety and/or privacy level for US companies?

Of course no, why in the world would it.

Besides, Trump already was a president. I don’t remember any safety decline in that period.

@randahl Need an "it's not safe, but neither is it now" option.
@randahl IMO it's neither safe now in regards of privacy aspects at least.
@randahl Do you remember Edward Snowden. I think Obama was POTUS then or what happend to Adobe Users from Venezuela in 2019? So I never felt safe.
@randahl not worried a bit, the majority of the 'big' companies have data centers in Europe and have to comply with various regulations like GDPR,DSA,DMA, #EU Dat Act. I don't see a scenario where all these companies would compromise the most lucrative market for them-the EU.
@ashtime @randahl I guess we'll see just how lucrative the EU market is with what Apple will be doing to comply or not comply with EU regulations.
Apple reaches deal with EU regulators to open up mobile payments system to rivals

EU antitrust chief Margrethe Vestager said the European Commission accepted commitments from Apple to open access to its tap and go payments tech to rivals.

CNBC

@ashtime @philbee @randahl

Even outside of that, Apple doesn't really affect how lucrative our market is.

@ashtime @randahl So you just hat to flaunt that you don't have a clue about the meaning "foreign or domestic" in the US law.....
@AngelaScholder @randahl and you think that only US has something like 'foreign or domestic' in law? You know that other countries have laws and that corporations have separate entities in other countries as well?
@ashtime @randahl You mentioned compliance to the GDPR.
That's just a joke!
The GDPR is just only a fine when it comes to the US law for US companies.
@AngelaScholder @randahl I did mention several other laws and regulation as well and these were only the EU ones, didn't even go to mention country specific. Fines if big enough are a good deterrent for corporations, you can't really realistically expect some corporation to be ethical-not in this form of capitalism that we live in right now.
@randahl Protonmail just announced a Google Docs killer and my immediate first thought was "thank god, I do not trust Google to keep my data private anymore"
@randahl Nope. I think I’m going to migrate all my stuff over to Chinese cloud storage services instead. The Great Firewall should be more than enough to keep my data hidden from the all-seeing eye of the American Empire.

@randahl I moved mostly to Murena and Proton. I'll delete old dropbox this week.

Not sure what to do with iCloud  May be get one of pine tablets?

@randahl
You are asking the wrong question. It's not safe *regardless* of who's elected.
@spiegelmama
@randahl It's not safe now. There is no cloud just other people's computers.

@randahl That's the wrong question. Trump is a huge problem. But my data is per se not secure with US-companies.

There is no real difference for the data if they are in the US or in China: both states give themselves the right to look into your data and both states don't care to tell it to you.

Snowden showed us years ago into which length the US-authorities go to break into everyones data.

And don't tell me it's okay because the US is a democracy. It's a democracy in decline.

@jensgro @randahl I don't think Randahl is a democracy :). He lives in one. In Denmark (which LOVES to suckle personal information).

@randahl

Yep, I agree.

The US has never been safe, you need a third option.

@randahl Not safe with any president!
@randahl voted not safe but in general and not because of Trump. I run my own cloud hosted on a NAS system

@randahl I do not consider data stored there safe, no matter who is the president. USA seem to be already clear about the policy: corporation can do whatever with our data and additionally the government agencies are to be granted extra access, especially for data of foreign users.

The data I still store there is either not important/sensitive or encrypted by me first (I would not trust encryption provided by those companies to fully protect my data).

I trust EU organizations just a bit more.

@randahl It's not really safe anyway, but particularly stupid politicians do particularly stupid things.

I remember spending ages arguing with my old MP about the snoopers charter and he just couldn't get his head around the fact that making things less secure but more illegal would not work because you have to assume anything on the internet is accessible outside your jurisdiction.

@randahl

No data is secure today and it won't be secure after the election regardless in who wins. Not unless you have the data in your own paws and there is no access from outside. And even then it's dependant on the drive working.

@randahl I never considered it save since Snowden. But that has two parts really: 1. US three letters can do to foreigners almost what ever they want 2. Big tech companies consider themselves above the law and them US gov let's them do what ever they want. Not that EU has much success, influence or sanity in most of their efforts. But at least they are trying
@randahl this has nothing to do with trump. But I would still not store my data on US servers just for the NSA to do with it as they please.
@randahl @metacurity It was never save to begin with. It is a cloud shit. If you want save, host it yourself
@randahl It's not safe without Trump either, of course.

@randahl Define safe.

Safe from access by government agencies?
Safe from foreign influence (relative to the US)?
Safe from access by commercial or private third party (hack, bribery, leak)?
Safe from technical failure?
Safe from administrative disruption (e.g. company shuts down the service, changes prices to unacceptable, refuses service to you for some reason)?

I'd say it isn't very safe right now the most of this. Big companies are relatively safe when it comes to technical failure and private third-party access and even that isn't guaranteed.

E.g. Google still considers requests of Russian government and sometimes acts accordingly and certainly they will consider requests of EU governments not to mention their own. Google and other closed down or changed policy of dozens of their services. They had data lost due to technical failure and did not recover some of it.

I'd say Trump won't add much risk factor to all that :)

@randahl storing data in the US was never safe
@randahl not safe now and still will not be safe if Trump is reelected.
@randahl Not safe, and has nothing to do with Trump or with being outside the US.

@randahl

What worries me even more than my own data, is the scientific data hosted by institutions such as the NIH (NCBI), without which most of the biomedical research in the rest of the world will screech to a grinding halt.

@randahl Not safe regardless of president...

@catsalad @randahl Yeah, I boosted the poll but didn't vote in it because "I don't have any of that* because it's not safe NOW and hasn't been since forever." The Snowden disclosures about NSA in the infrastructure were in 2011, and it wasn't new news then, just confirmation of what the wise already suspected.

* Asterisk because it's impossible to be highly online without touching the clown-- er, cloud-- at least a little. Forex I need limited-purpose cloudco email accts for deliverability.

@randahl not safe, but that's got nothing much to do with Trump, it's just got to do with America

I don't feel it's safe under anyone haha. No US government leader has ever fought back against the intelligence apparatus of their own state.

They just don't care about privacy

@randahl Many companies, mine included, are already making moves towards services that are not located in the US, or at least make it easier to move when needed.

@randahl

Neither options.

It's not safe because companies I have no power over decide what happens with my data and US presidents don't care about non-US citizens. Has nothing to do with Trump or Biden.

@randahl You should add Meta to that list.

@randahl

There is no "safe" if Trump is re-elected.

@randahl doubtful they are safe anyhow
@randahl it's already not safe, current legal protection is inadequate/flawed, but also in a more practical/technical sense our data is not safe (see the recent Microsoft problems with security).
@randahl I work at an Australian university and we already don't allow data to be stored on anything other than Australian servers as a matter of policy.
@randahl I recently had to renew an SSL cert and all the providers seemed to be in Southern USA - whilst this was for a non controversial site (health/social care in Britain for seniors) I have concerns if/when USA implements Project 2025 - I don't think they would be able to censor foreign hosted sites in their home countries but could simply "refuse to do business" and/or work to keep stuff they don't want out of the USA (already happening as a backlash against GDPR)
@randahl It's a bit of a pointless question because the answer has to be "no" regardless of Trump/Non-Trump. You should not have sensitive data in ANY of those.

@randahl

I don't consider it safe now, why would I consider it safe when a fascist takes over?