For the love of god, stop making every tutorial for a piece of software a goddamn video.
It makes it impossible for people to tell if the tutorial even addresses their question at a glance.
For the love of god, stop making every tutorial for a piece of software a goddamn video.
It makes it impossible for people to tell if the tutorial even addresses their question at a glance.
@queex I just want a decent bit of text with some screenshots that I can text search in.
I fondly remember the ANSYS help files of 2008. Such detail, such organisation. Tooootal lack of worked examples...
@queex number of videos for sw i've found useful: zero.
number of docs for sw i've found useful: thousands, at least.
if you are going to make a video please also include a transcript, please.
In a document: "How to do X in Y"
In a video: "Hello again, this is part 4 of my series about Y. Last time I talked about Z, click the link in the description to find it. Today we're going to be talking about X, and how X can help you in many different ways. *Intro music* If you find this video useful, please remember to like and subscribe! Now, let's get to it— *demonstrates W*"
Just so useless. Even when a visual aid is useful, picture are generally better. And even when you really need a video, make a 5 second one in isolation. I do not care about your 'numbers' and never will.
Short, looped 5-10 second (or maybe more) clips embedded in a written tutorial gives you all the visual information you could need, without having to rewind or scan forwards to find it again.
Pace is a big drawback. You can process written information at whatever speed you want; A/V dictates its own speed.
And nobody benefits from the "like and subscribe" churn, where the useful information is hidden behind layers of branding and optimisation for the Algorithm.
There's a place for video, don't get me wrong, but not in the way video tutorials exist now, and certainly not to the point where written versions simply don't exist anymore, as we're heading towards.
(Video is also a big accessibility problem.)
Omg +1. Drives me crazy to see a video for something that would take 5secs to skim for a specific piece of info. There is no problem to solve here so STOP IT
Exactly! If video is a must, at least provide a (human-curated) transcript!
I've determined - for me... that if I HAVE to watch a video - then it more than likely is not for me.
Especially if it is longer than 2 to 5 minutes. That is dead giveaway that I need to keep looking.
@queex @Jgmeadows Yep, I prefer:
Search “configure feature Alpha in FooApp”
to
“Hi! I’m Jason, Customer Delight Assurance Manager at FooApp. We’re so pleased you’ve chosen us to help you manage your foo needs. In this overly long and not terribly informative video, I’ll take you through some of the main features of FooApp. Those features may or may not include the one you’re interested in, and even if it does I may not tell you what you need to know.
Let’s get started!…”
@queex I don't know how many times I've screamed "get to the fucking point!" when I've watched something like this.
Typically I drop it on x2 and then manually drag to the point where they get past their intro, their ad for their sponsor, a side journey discussing an unrelated topic, and finally to the 5 seconds where they don't actually show me the thing I came here to see.
Sometimes I don't mind video tutorials, but put the steps in the description, pleeeeeaaaasssse!!!
While I agree (wholeheartedly) sadly I don't think this will be a thing until YouTube stops paying more to show a video ad than AdSense does to show a text/image based one on a blog. Oh, and that video ads stop being harder for adblockers to stop than text/image based ads.
To be honest, the commoditisation of tutorials is a big part of the problem. Conversation rate only matters if you're counting something for revenue or marketing reasons, and it's an approach that's fundamentally incompatible with the purpose oh tutorials or other help online.
@queex Tbh, this just struck me as exactly a reason I find video tutorials kind of silly... 🤨 I already found the faff of trying to hop around the timeline if I needed to reference something, awkward, but this definitely hits the nail on the head on another point...
Strangely though, I've seen a community where this very much _isn't_ the common sentiment... when people come and ask, I've had a long history of people _actively_ asking if there's a video tutorial on what they're looking for... 😬
Some tasks are quicker to learn with text, instead of watching someone drag their caret up and down their screen.
@queex https://youtu.be/9NvoLy5_v4c?t=380
They are also used for malware distribution
@queex I'm at least 10x less likely to watch a video about anything I'm trying to solve unless it's a situation where seeing how it's done visually is going to help. Things like welding, machining, and carpentry, and even there I prefer text with good diagrams.
FFS. If you can write code, you can write text. Don't sell your skills short. Get an editor if you're worried about style and syntax.
@queex
The Unix/Linux man page; howto approach is excellent.
There are parts where a short - 30 seconds - embedded video or attached video or link to a video would assist someone.
But there are nowadays people in front of computers who cannot read, or are in the perhaps 10% who although they technically can read are functionally illiterate.
And I don't think videos help them much either. With software.