@[email protected] I find the interest rate situation in Norway extra annoying, because even with it not working to bring down inflation, the one silver lining it should have had was to cool the housing market. Instead, house prices are still going up because we completely stopped building đđđ
43/ And that gets us the whole âwhat is inflation?â. Because if it is that it is harder to make ends meet because everything is more expensive. Then they are actually creating MORE inflation.
Yeah, we are exposed to the exchange rate, but now we are killing the economy thatâs supposed to compensate, while driving actual living costs even further through the roof.
44/ Housing is also a weird market in general, because once youâre in, you buy and sell in the same market. So that market becomes sort of disconnected from everything else. Because demand is constant and supply is pretty constrained: the people selling their homes and newly built stuff.
But with no construction the supply is even more constrained, and the people buying are mostly the people selling, so it becomes a strange closed loop system.
45/ However, if you are a renter you are also getting hit, again by different effects. The current left coalition (and previous iterations) have wanted to make it less lucrative to be a landlord. So margins have shrunk due to higher taxes etc. But a lot of this has been funded through loans, and so those margins are getting squeezed further. So landlords are either selling off their properties, which are often in the cities, or raising rents. But the housing market is undersupplied so it just absorbs these properties.
So now we have fewer rental properties, which would drive up prices on its own (according to economic theory đ ), but the remaining market is also increasing rent to compensate for higher interest rates.
So even if you rent you are getting hit by the interest rate. And actually itâs worse there, because rents will for sure not go down in the same way mortgages will if/when they reduce the interest rate.
46/ Or in kubernetes analogy (because of Cybercyn and the book The Unaccountability Machine): some stuff in our system (the Norwegian housing market) are auto-scaling in some cloud, some are manually scaled (by buying and adding new servers in our on prem data center) and once the peak in consumption is over, some things might scale down quickly, but some are stuck now with a lot of expensive hardware taking up space in our server racks.
Mortgages are in AWS and rents are on-prem in my very confusing analogy.
47/ I donât know what the answer is, my earlier idea of constraining the supply of NOK⌠it looks like they did that, and it had apparently about as much effect as the interest rate (not much if any).
Maybe without these two things it wouldâve spiraled out of control⌠but I donât think so, because this wasnât caused by our economy.
So maybe the best thing wouldâve been to just accept it? Yeah, the NOK is weak, because the world is rough, increase salaries some and just sit tight? Maybe even stimulate internal growth to compensate?
52/ Ok, I think I get it. MMT says that a deficit isnât a sign of government overspending, inflation is. (And here they are clearly talking about the overheated economy inflation) So as long as the spending doesnât cause inflation, it doesnât matter if you run with a deficit even over a longer period (she mentioned decades).
So basically she is sort of saying that deficits arenât real because taxes arenât real.
This is more like the water in a radiator system (my analogy). You can add in water or remove water, but the system isnât the water. And adding water (money) only becomes a problem when the pressure in the system gets too high and water starts spilling out somewhere.
Basically, money isnât ârealâ. Itâs⌠just water in a radiator system in a building. The building and the radiators and the people living there are the real things.
@[email protected] @[email protected] Most economic forecasting models are relatively simple and don't require supercomputers (because the models are oversimplified). Steve Keen takes a System Dynamics approach and has many more feedback loops in his models. He's also one of the fiercest critics of mainstream economics I know of, for many of the same reasons @[email protected] is. Worth looking up, if it interests you.
Modern Monetary Theory states thatâs, because the government of a country is the monopoly supplier of money, it has an unlimited capacity to pay for things and...
The Norwegian government receives revenues in both NOK and foreign currency from petroleum activities. Some of these revenues are used to finance a planned central government budget deficit. Norges Bank carries out the necessary foreign exchange transactions associated with petroleum revenue spending. These foreign exchange transactions are planned and smoothed over the year and are pre-announced each month.
62/ I feel so smart when I read news articles that agree with me đ¤ đ¤Ł
âAnd an interest rate increase will not help, he believes. - The higher the interest rate goes, the more landlords have to raise the rent, and then the interest rate increase is inflationary. It does not have the same effect as in the housing market, where prices fall if interest rates rise. The interest rate is not a good weapon to deal with this kind of inflation. It makes matters worse, he says.â
https://e24.no/norsk-oekonomi/i/93zl4d/uenige-om-leieprisene-det-gjoer-vondt-verre
65/ After spending ages on inflation, Iâm apparently breezing through chapter 3 âThe National Debt (That Isnât)â
Basically, in the same way tax isnât real (in that it is just a mechanism to remove money from the economy and/or create demand for the currency. MMT says that the deficit isnât real. Very clear that it is the US they are talking about. To generalize to more countries she picked the UK and I wouldâve preferred another more ânormalâ country.
@Patricia I don't follow the radiator analogy.
My simple understanding currently is (and I should acknowledge that each of these was once a revelation to me and that journey is incomplete)
1. money is debt.
2. government debt is fundamentally different to household debt.
I think we've covered the first one. (But note that it surprises people)
The second one, and maybe we're retreading ground already covered, but so be it.
cont...
@Patricia Household debt is about balancing consumption over a lifetime. We borrow to buy a car, a house, which we then use while we repay the debt.
Government debt's not like that, because governments are, for practical purposes, immortal. It doesn't need to be repaid, or if it does, it can be rolled over and funded with extra debt.
Extra debt can always be issued (printed). But there are consequences.
cont...
@Patricia The immediate consequence of printing money is that all the money you've already printed becomes worth less. (Not worthless, just, worth less)
Over simplification, but imagine you have a fixed supply of goods, and a certain supply of money. And you print a lot more money, as much again, for example.
Suddenly, you have twice the currency chasing the same quantity of goods. Absent price fixing (which is a whole 'nuther issue), the price of goods will double.
So far so good?