@lorihc for real change, it needs to be democrats â real ones, not those play-acting as one â winning majorities in all branches. Itâs the only way for real change to be lawfully enacted.
Maybe a windfall would motivate them to getting it done in the first two years before a massive swing back the other way in the mid terms, as appears to be tradition.
Re-upping this in order to explain how we got to this point in the đșđž. https://awscommunity.social/@mastobit/112527850607368106 In short, there is no real opposition party within this #corporate #duopoly. To suggest #VoteBlueNoMatterWho is an understandable act of desperation. But to this point, the #Democrats have not been bulwarks of #democracy even under supermajorities. Voting đłïž alone wonât do it. *YOU*, yes *you*, need to start unions â and run for office. Unite. Flood the political zone. https://represent.us #uspol
In a perfect world, say, 200,000 Democrats from other states would get up and MOVE EN MASSE to frickinâ Wyoming and work remotely but more importantly REGISTER TO VOTE IN WYOMING THEN VOTE DEM AS A BLOC and frickinâ take TWO SENATE SEATS as well as a couple more electoral college seats.
If only Dem voters had the zeal, energy, persistence, and go-for-it-ness of Redditâs DIAMONDHAND APES OF $GME.
THAT would be action. THAT would be something.
@brianstorms @lorihc will you do this yourself? Between financial, family, and risk aspects ("Hey honey! Let's move to a state where most people hate us, and you don't have rights over your own body!") it's not surprising it doesn't happen. Heck, Libertarians tried to do this to a town in IIRC NH a while back and failed utterly, which would have required far fewer people.
I've had the same fantasy, but it would need someone able to fund each family to the tune of $50K to make it possible.
This:
âhad all the opportunityâ
is pretty ignorant.
Liberals have not had the Supreme Court in decades.
Even when Democrats have had the White House and Congress, they still donât have âall the opportunityâ because the Senate is supermajority rule. Even if it werenât, the composition of the Senate overweights rural interests.
Itâs *still* important to elect Democrats because the alternative is worse. Not accomplishing as much as *you* would like is not the worst outcome.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment I want you to imagine, for a second, that you live in Australia.
You are required to vote. Itâs compulsory. You are also required to vote for every candidate - you must place a number in every box on your ballot, indicating your preferences.
Whoâs coming out ahead of who?
I donât believe for a second you genuinely have no preference. I donât believe you wouldnât put one of them ahead of the other.
Thatâs what youâre doing here. Your voting system is busted but we all know the two parties that will emerge are D and R, and thatâs the preference youâve got to express.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment i don't think you got what i was saying, although i also think your characterisation is pretty unfair; i see a lot of stories about what the current administration is doing and i don't even live there.
but like - you know what current guy is like, because he's been there for a while. you know what other guy is like, because he was also there for a while. are you genuinely telling me you have no preference for the policies and behaviours of one over the other? i don't believe you. you're lying to me and to yourself.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment what are you talking about?
like genuinely, it's like youâre not reading what i'm saying at all. are you an AI?