This:
“had all the opportunity”
is pretty ignorant.
Liberals have not had the Supreme Court in decades.
Even when Democrats have had the White House and Congress, they still don’t have “all the opportunity” because the Senate is supermajority rule. Even if it weren’t, the composition of the Senate overweights rural interests.
It’s *still* important to elect Democrats because the alternative is worse. Not accomplishing as much as *you* would like is not the worst outcome.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment I want you to imagine, for a second, that you live in Australia.
You are required to vote. It’s compulsory. You are also required to vote for every candidate - you must place a number in every box on your ballot, indicating your preferences.
Who’s coming out ahead of who?
I don’t believe for a second you genuinely have no preference. I don’t believe you wouldn’t put one of them ahead of the other.
That’s what you’re doing here. Your voting system is busted but we all know the two parties that will emerge are D and R, and that’s the preference you’ve got to express.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment i don't think you got what i was saying, although i also think your characterisation is pretty unfair; i see a lot of stories about what the current administration is doing and i don't even live there.
but like - you know what current guy is like, because he's been there for a while. you know what other guy is like, because he was also there for a while. are you genuinely telling me you have no preference for the policies and behaviours of one over the other? i don't believe you. you're lying to me and to yourself.
@dxpack @lorihc @marcoarment what are you talking about?
like genuinely, it's like you’re not reading what i'm saying at all. are you an AI?