@christianschwaegerl @petergleick See there's really two possibilities here:
1) the NYT editorial board are political neophytes and have no idea how political campaigns are run nor how candidates are selected.
or
2) the NYT wants Trump to win.
Take your pick.
@christianschwaegerl @petergleick "These images now define him?"
Only in your fantasies.
No one watched the debate except partisans and wonks.
IMO, the only lasting effect of Thursday's pointless farce is that the bar is now set incredibly low for Biden.
Of course Biden will not drop out. He will win the nomination. The Dem convention will be a joyous celebration of Biden/Harris. Capped off with a great speech by the nominee.
The NYT Ed. Board will give him their full-throated endorsement.
@christianschwaegerl @petergleick It's all so stupid. The NYT Ed Board pretending that anything that happened during the debate mattered *AND* also pretending that their opinion matters for anything.
Biden is going to ignore them. Just as Trump already does.
America's political press can no longer claim to have any relevance.
They could matter. The 4th estate has incredible power in a democracy. But they long ago chose to play the kayfabe referee.
@christianschwaegerl @petergleick Everyone's problems can only get worse. He's "steering the West" now.
Are you calling for him to resign the Presidency?
@christianschwaegerl @petergleick since you don't live in America, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and just tell you that you are wrong to say (As you have said repeatedly) that Biden can't beat Trump.
Biden is very well positioned to win in November. Which is 3 months from now.
Take a deep breath. Look at a calendar. Pace yourself.