How to actually appeal to young voters and win the 2024 elections
Joe Biden.... w a k e u p
This is elderly abuse
These are my favorite Dark Brandon memes (it was funny before Biden did this himself)
I am a true Dark Brandon Acolyte
This is a supervillain speech
I can't take it no more

Things that are younger than Joe Biden (1942) or Donald Trump (1946):

  • Bill Clinton (1946)
  • India (1947)
  • Diamonds on engagement rings (1947)
  • Color TVs (1954)
  • US Highways (1956)
  • Alaska and Hawaii being US States (1959)
  • Birth Control Pills (1960)
  • Walmart (1962)
  • Pineapple on Pizza (1962)
  • Legal Interracial Marriage (1967)
  • Calling 911 (1968)
  • High Fives (1977)
  • Last French Guillotine Execution (1977)
  • CNN (1980)
  • Ciabatta Bread (1982)

Also: Over 95% of the US Population is below the age of 78.

99% willpower 1% aim
There can only be one
WE FOUND HIM
Vincent Van Gogh to the polls
The final time anyone is allowed to post this image
We're so barack
This was all a ploy
They're not ready πŸ₯₯🌴
The Lord Almighty has Spoken
The whitest man you know will fall out of a coconut tree πŸ₯₯🌴
If you can't give us Buttigeg, at least consider...
It's Kamencing πŸ₯₯🌴
ALL IN WHICH YOU LIVE AND WHAT CAME BEFORE YOU πŸ₯₯🌴
to distract from the fact Joe Biden was too senile to have a debate, The Guardian published an article claiming he has β€œgood sex” with his wife. we're just supposed to pretend this didn't happen or...??
@ErikUden
Ich finde es immer wieder gruselig, wie dieser cop am lachen ist
@ErikUden the part where the wench stopped yapping and the nature started naturing was the part I enjoyed
@ErikUden We should be so lucky. We could have Ster in charge of the Department of Gaming.
Rats, we're rats; we're the rats.

I'M DA GIANT RAT DAT MAKES ALL OF DA RULEZEdit: I rarely upload things to YouTube and barely ever check comments, I also did not realize that this video had ...

YouTube
@ErikUden
Debates would be interesting, that's for sure.
@ErikUden What God wants, God gets.
@ErikUden
I'll steal a line from Douglas Adams here:
"My cat. I call him The Lord Almighty".
Said by the man in a shack who makes all the important political decisions about the galaxy without knowing that's what he's doing. Which might also be relevant here. πŸ˜›
@ErikUden The Lord almighty being Obama
@ErikUden he would win, and goppers would be very cranky
@ErikUden Deep State alles hÀngt zusammen 🀣
@ErikUden if only he'd held a rally at the foot of the Dark Tower
@ErikUden

"Over 95% of the US Population is below the age of 78."

yeah because they die of poverty and gun violence before
@ErikUden "last French guillotine execution" seems presumptive.
@driusan β€œlast French guillotine execution... for now”
@ErikUden even Ozzy Osbourne and Alice Cooper are younger. (Both 1948). But Trump is younger than Mick Jagger (1943).

@ErikUden

Biden and Trump are older than the first working transistor (1948).

The resistor is older. It has been there for ages.

@ErikUden and you know what? I would pay for their golf game if that would mean that neither of them would take the poliitical power they are trying to get.
@ErikUden even in golf he cheats.
@TechnicalAdept Isn't trump like the 10th best payed athlete in all of the US if you only take the salary he got whilst golfing in his four year term? I think I heard some insane statistic like that
@ErikUden @TechnicalAdept

erik, you don't realise what

the usa army has lots of golf resorts where presidents can usually golf, that's what obama and others did, and it costs little because it is a state property

trump was literally getting his entire family and secret service protection to stay at his resorts, and as president, the usa taxpayer would pay for it and he was charging ridiculous amounts

the fucker was literally robbing the usa taxpayer to play golf
@ErikUden The sad state of world affairs..
@ErikUden do you know why this "elderly" thing is entirely manufactured by republicans?

chuck grassley is a republican senator, WHO IS LITERALLY 90 YEARS OLD TODAY, and there absolutely nobody complaining about that

he is going to complete his term in the senate, which is a six year term btw, and republicans will never utter a single word about that
@NeonPurpleStar yeah, it's silly. I personally think no politician should be of that age, including Bernie Sanders despite me endorsing him.
@ErikUden if it was biden vs romney or biden vs whoever of old version of the republican party, i would agree that is there is merit to these discussions

but in the current circumstances, people in the usa should realise that they should just suck it up and vote for biden

even people like dick cheney (who was bush's vice president) and elizabeth cheney have said this

@NeonPurpleStar you can criticize a guy and still vote for him, here's my general opinion on Biden and the election:

https://mastodon.de/@ErikUden/112317115359168819

I think the thing that separates us from the Republicans the most is that we don't have some sort of cult around the main guy, like we can criticize him and still vote for the party he represents, as well as criticize that party's flaws.

Erik Uden πŸ₯₯πŸŒ΄πŸ‘ (@[email protected])

Joe Biden has deported more people than Donald Trump [[1](https://www.washingtonpost.com/immigration/2024/02/11/trump-biden-immigration-border-compared/)], funded the police more than Trump [[2](https://democrats.org/news/president-biden-expands-funding-after-republicans-voted-against-funding-for-the-police/)], and has now helped to kill more Palestinians than Trump [[3](https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/11/14/us-president-biden-sued-for-complicity-in-israels-genocide-in-gaza)]. If you cannot allow criticism towards this person because you believe critiquing them is the same as endorsing the opponent, then you are participating in the very cult behavior you should be criticizing. # Yes, Trump would be worse, way worse... ...but it's horrible to compare Trump's *potential* genocide to Biden's currently real and ongoing genocide. Voting Democrat is *harm reduction*, portraying it overall as anything else is, *in my privileged opinion*, incorrect. In many individual examples I can, however, see how you come to view the Democrats not just as the lesser evil, but even positively. Many vulnerable groups such as queer (*especially trans*) people are helped by a Democratic government, even maintaining the right to abortion is, visibly, helped by Democrats. There are examples in which voting the Democratic Party betters the lives of certain groups. Yet that change doesn't come sustainably and the tides may as well turn. If the Democratic Party is willing to throw one group of people under the bus for winning Republican voters, who is to say they won't do the same with your group? If you don't give human rights to everyone, it's not a right anymore, it's being treated human as a privilege. When it comes to foreign policy, unions, most social services, the treatment of the poor, healthcare, border policy, it's mostly the same between the two parties. Trump is merely the [death of the euphemism](https://youtu.be/0dBJIkp7qIg). A queer person won't vote for a party that doesn't support queer rights, so what should someone of another marginalized group *not* supported by the Democrats do? Additionally, don't forget that **it was the Democratic party that supported and funded Donald Trump's primary election in 2015** [[4](https://observer.com/2016/10/wikileaks-reveals-dnc-elevated-trump-to-help-clinton/)] as they always back the most far right candidate [[5](https://www.opensecrets.org/news/2022/07/democrats-spend-millions-on-republican-primaries/)] in order to even make a distinction between the two parties visible. What I'm trying to say is that you, as a democratic voter, cannot blame someone for supporting an alternative party, nor claim that supporting that third party is horrible merely because it may β€œallow for a Republican victory.” If it was in the Democrat's interest to change the election system or electoral college to allow for something other than effectively a two party system, then they would've done so. I won't ride a high horse and claim it's morally wrong to support the Democrats, **I don't think that.** I do believe, however, that many people are disillusioned in voting for Democrats but know **voting for Republicans only makes things worse.** If not allowing a Republican victory was in the Democrat's interest, then they would **adapt the party's stance to social, non-war/non-genocide, non-deportation, anticapitalist, pro-Housing, and pro-Healthcare for all positions**. They don't, so ***what choice is there*** for people from marginalized groups other than voting for a third party? Can you tell them it's only morally right to vote for a party that **worsens their living conditions** or **wishes to have them erased?** A representative democracy exists so people can voice their opinions through voting in the representation they favor β€” if you critique them because the USA's democratic system fails to represent them, hence they should vote for one of the two representations that are possible, but aim to kill them or worsen their lives, then you are critiquing an individual for the faultiness of the system. *And last but not least,* any person should still be called out for β€œboycotting the election”, **not voting is ridiculous** which is perfectly [explained by Jay Foreman here](https://youtu.be/_gbDAvK42yA). ***Participate in every election while you can***. :voteblue: :dsa:

MastodonDE
@ErikUden if we are discussing in a vacuum i agree with you

i just think that whatever criticisms everyone has, should come AFTER the elections

@NeonPurpleStar People shouldn't be foiled! If voting for a guy is simply harm reduction, them telling them the truth is honest. It only gets worse if you promise them the world but can't keep those promises. So, no. Be realistic! Be honest about what this election is about: preventing another term of Donald Trump.

People should expect a reform of the electoral college from a party that calls itself democratic, rendering Gerrymandering impossible. But neither the Democrats nor the Republicans are interested in that because it removes them from being one of the two options and opens up for the Greens, PSL, DSA, or even the worse ones like Libertarian. However, I think that'd still be preferable.

So what I'm trying to say here is that we can't keep thinking from election to election, because living conditions keep getting worse, under Biden or Donald Trump. Lying to them and oppressing all legitimate criticism of a candidate until the election is selling people for stupid. I can understand that Biden is suboptimal and still vote for him to prevent the far worse alternative!

@ErikUden i am 100% with you on these points, but this should be planned further down the road after the elections