Casual reminder that #Assange isn’t a “journalist who revealed war crimes”. Assange actively prevented publication of any documents incriminating #Russia or #Syria in war crimes and he actively distributed every single Russian fake to his multi-million audience after 2014. All these screenshots I made myself with wide open eyes and wondering “WTF is he doing”.
@kravietz
Self-absorbed egomaniac with a story of sexual abuse. The guy is a dangerous idiot.
@kravietz Interesting. Any sources I can read to back this claim up?
"Assange actively prevented publication of any documents incriminating #Russia or #Syria in war crimes"

@emilion

IIRC this bias was mentioned by one of the former Wikileaks insiders who said Assange was actively preventing publication of Russian leaks received by the project:

“We had several leaks sent to Wikileaks, including the Russian hack. It would have exposed Russian activities and shown WikiLeaks was not controlled by Russian security services,” the source who provided the messages wrote to FP. “Many Wikileaks staff and volunteers or their families suffered at the hands of Russian corruption and cruelty, we were sure Wikileaks would release it. Assange gave excuse after excuse.”

https://archive.is/ztpnZ

If you followed the project like I did, the bias was quite obvious for for years all you had was a circumstantial impression of bias. Then after 2014 this changed in the way that they no longer merely skipped any serious Russian leaks but actually started posting Russian fakes (like the ones about MH17, which was especially disgusting). Then there was this interview which was like “a-ha!” moment.

@emilion @kravietz

WikiLeaks declined to publish a wide-ranging trove of documents — at least 68 gigabytes of data — that came from inside the Russian Interior Ministry

Google it. Too many sources to quote.

WikiLeaks Turned Down Leaks on Russian Government During U.S. Presidential Campaign

The leak organization ignored damaging information on the Kremlin to focus on Hillary Clinton and election-related hacks.

Yahoo News

@emilion @kravietz

It doesn't show anything but excuses for being one dimensional.

@kravietz As I see it the entire deal about Assange was exactly this - that journalist who uncovered war crimes was prosecuted and jailed.

He might have done other things intentionally or not but they wasn't what attracted the attention to this situation. The problem wasn't with Assange himself but with this situation in general.

Also I wonder if one is related to another. I mean when your government goes after you for exposing something which you consider to be public interest you are more likely to fall under influence or strike deals with the opposing side so to speak. Not the first time.

@kravietz honestly, I never separated his whistleblowing from his pro-Russian activism…I just see him as a person with rights who happened to do some positive leaks

@kravietz

Biased and controversial…

In fact a Russian asset.

@kravietz
Good reminder. But Human Rights also apply to idiots. By punishing him in this unjust way the US / Europe act exactly like Russia wants us to. So they can finger point and say: "Look! They have political prisoners, too! Western Democracy is a facade!"

@Bustel

punishing him in this unjust way

What exactly you’re calling a “punishment”?

So they can finger point and say

Russia produces an endless stream of nonsense. We have our brains specifically in order to distinguish what Russia says from the reality 🤷

@kravietz Do not forget this:
A reporter worried that Assange would risk killing Afghans who had co-operated with American forces if he put US secrets online without taking the basic precaution of removing their names. "Well, they're informants," Assange replied. "So, if they get killed, they've got it coming to them. They deserve it.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2011/sep/18/julian-assange-wikileaks-nick-cohen
The treachery of Julian Assange

Nick Cohen: The WikiLeaks founder, far from being a champion of freedom, is an active danger to the real seekers of truth

The Guardian
@jmarnesto @kravietz Foolish, egotistical and dangerous. There's more that aligns him with Trump, unfortunately.
@kravietz Please elaborate on your statement that he "actively prevented publication of any documents incriminating Russia or Syria" - were such documents leaked to WikiLeaks at all? If they were, did they satisfy WikiLeaks's normal criteria for authenticity?

@michaelgraaf

There was plenty of documents related to Russia that Wikileaks received but withheld. In one case Wikileaks staff has actually sold the leaks they received back to Russia and Belarus, leading to imprisonment of the whistleblowers.

  • https://www.dailydot.com/debug/wikileaks-syria-files-syria-russia-bank-2-billion/
  • https://www.thedailybeast.com/syria-chemical-attack-deniers-admit-links-to-wikileaks-and-russia
  • https://archive.thinkprogress.org/dump-of-wikileaks-messages-shines-light-on-assanges-conspiracy-theories-324923bf22a3/
  • https://patribotics.blog/2020/01/03/wikileaks-russian-ties-julian-assanges-forgotten-trips-to-moscow/amp/
  • https://archive.is/ztpnZ
  • https://www.theguardian.com/media/2011/jan/31/wikileaks-holocaust-denier-handled-moscow-cables
  • As for your “normal criteria for authenticity”, please check the below screenshot I made with my own hands when #Wikileaks hastily vetted for the authenticity of #MacronLeaks which came out to be a carefully prepared fake 😂

    WikiLeaks release excludes evidence of €2 billion transfer from Syria to Russia

    WikiLeaks denies withholding any documents it received as part of its 'Syria Files' release.

    The Daily Dot
    @kravietz
    Then perhaps the US should have sued him for having hidden truths, and not for having published truths...

    @mariedocet

    I don’t need US to consider him a scumbag 🤷

    @mariedocet By the way, he had not merely “hidden truths”, he was actually lying about events such as MH17, Guccifer and anything related to Russia in general.
    @kravietz
    My point exactly: US did sue him only for telling truths , not for hiding truths or spreading disinformation.
    Questionable morals from their judicial system.
    @kravietz Jup. His more-or-less release is a win for freedom, but that doesn't mean he's also a friggin' manipulative asshole, to say the least.

    @kravietz @tante

    Das Gegenargument gegen die Strafverfolgung gegen Assange hat nichts mit ihm zu tun, sondern damit ob man will, dass Veröffentlichungen von Nicht-Staatsbürgern eines Landes ausserhalb der Jurisdiktion eines Landes strafverfolgt werden können sollen. Mit EXAKT dem gleichen Recht könnte auch Nordkorea Menschen aus Europa strafverfolgen, wenn sie sich in Europa kritisch zu Kim Jong Un äußern.

    @kravietz He did both, reveal war crimes, and also cover up war crimes. It is possible to do both.
    @kravietz
    This is the Halo effect. A person does one (high profile) good thing and therefore we assume he's a 'good guy'.
    There are no good or bad people and we shouldn't depend on people 'doing the right thing'.
    A person exposes a flaw in the system? Fix the system, don't make that person an oracle or prophet.
    @kravietz Yup. Russian asset, and a shadow asset for the 2016 Trump campaign.