@jastity Anything in the checkbox lists is there because it was entered by enough participants, so if I've omitted something it wasn't a political choice, it was just statistics! If you want it to end up being a checkbox in the future, the best way is to invite intersex people to participate and remind them to type it into a text box. (Text box entries are counted and adjusted to account for typing-it-in negative bias.)

@gendercensus @jastity That sounds like a vicious cycle. Intersex people won't want to fill our your survey if you make them feel excluded. You should be putting in an effort to gather a representative sample by being explicitly inclusive. Otherwise past demographic statistics will continue to bias your data in a self-reinforcing loop.

@Grail @jastity How do you think someone in my position would choose which identity words relating to gender (or lack thereof) "should" be represented?

@gendercensus @jastity *You. I use capitalised neopronouns. Also I don't know because I gave up on the idea of categorising all genders in the world very quickly after I learned that xenogenders exist. I think there's a very serious risk that such efforts would have a detrimental effect on the nonbinary community, and I'm not sure anyone in the world is skilled and careful enough to do it in a way that doesn't end up contributing to truscum's narratives. So I'm just gonna offer feedback on problems, I don't have a grand vision of the "right" way to do something as dangerous as this.

@Grail @jastity Okay - then thank You for the feedback, and I will refer You to this section of the FAQs: https://www.gendercensus.com/faq/#add-my-words

@gendercensus @jastity The FAQ says you include both words in a contrasting set even if one of them isn't popular. For example, you include cisgender because you have transgender. Since you have human as an option, according to this policy you ought to also have otherkin, even if very few people select it.