"I'm so angry at Biden over Isreal/Gaza that I'm going to help Trump destroy democracy, weaponize the Justice system, send millions to deportation camps, lower the taxes on the wealthy and shift the burden to the middle class, cut Social Security, track and prosecute women having abortions, pardon the people who violently attacked Capitol police, dismantle NATO, help Russia, AND ON TOP OF ALL THAT do even more harm to Palestinians" is a take--it's just a really awful take, IMO.

@augieray

"I support this war so much that I'm going to ignore the position of the vast majority of my constituents and party members even though it endangers our chances of re-election in the Fall" is also a take.

@evan I find that glib. Biden does not "love war." And I suspect you're mature and smart enough to understand he's between a rock and a hard place over support for Israel and Gaza. So, in the end, the choice is yours: You can be really, really angry at Biden and not vote, or you can do more to help the world and make Gaza safer by voting for Biden. Elections are not love affairs--you're selecting between flawed choices, not getting everything you want in a candidate.
@augieray @evan And if a leader was supporting a regime killing your children you’d still vote for them as the lesser of two evils? I mean I get it - I’m as terrified of Trump 2 as anyone, but this isn’t an easy decision for anyone so a little bit of empathy does help rather than “you’re stoopid if you don’t vote”.
@seb321 @evan If it was a choice between one man who CLEARLY is doing his best to limit the violence while balancing sensitive political demands versus the man who thinks bombing people of color and Muslims is the answer, then yes, I'd vote the first guy. That's because I'm a mature voter who recognizes the way the world works and knows that I pick the candidate who is best, not the one who is perfect.
@evan @augieray Another question then: do you think people are more or less likely to vote the way you think they should after you have criticised them and described them as illogical? Aren’t you a bit like the men telling women why they are wrong to prefer the bear?

@seb321 @evan I said people who think like that have a bad take. I did not criticize them. I'm focused on the ideas and outcomes, not on criticizing people.

If I were to say the people who care about reproductive rights shouldn't avoid voting for Biden just because he has failed to get those rights passed into law, would that be criticizing people, or would that be addressing an illogical assessment?

@seb321 @evan @augieray

" do you think people are more or less likely to vote the way you think they should after you have criticised them and described them as illogical?l".

You're going to base your vote on what some rando said on the internet?

@seb321 @evan @augieray If being mildly criticized is enough to make you vote for a scumbag like Trump then I don't know what to tell you.
@seb321 @evan @augieray I think you’ve misjudged the positions. The person who recommends voting for Biden over Trump when neither option satisfies their beliefs on the conflict is akin to being the woman choosing the bear over the man. Neither choice is great, but they choose the better of the two options. You are the man of this story telling us why we’re wrong to prefer the bear.
@ClickyMcTicker @evan @augieray I’ve not posted any opinion on how anyone should vote. I’ve not even criticised anyone’s opinion on how anyone should vote. I’m questioning tactics.