Well this has been a long time coming: The FCC today levied fines totaling nearly $200 million against the four major carriers -- including AT&T, Sprint, T-Mobile and Verizon -- for illegally sharing access to customers' location information without consent.

Some highlights: "The FCC's findings against AT&T, for example, show that AT&T sold customer location data directly or indirectly to at least 88 third-party entities. The FCC found Verizon sold access to customer location data (indirectly or directly) to 67 third-party entities. Location data for Sprint customers found its way to 86 third-party entities, and to 75 third-parties in the case of T-Mobile customers."

..."The fine amounts vary because they were calculated based in part on each day that the carriers continued sharing customer location data after being notified that doing so was illegal (the agency also considered the number of active third-party location data sharing agreements). The FCC notes that AT&T and Verizon took more than 320 days from the publication of the Times story to wind down their data sharing agreements; T-Mobile took 275 days; Sprint kept sharing customer location data for 386 days."

More here: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2024/04/fcc-fines-major-u-s-wireless-carriers-for-selling-customer-location-data/

FCC Fines Major U.S. Wireless Carriers for Selling Customer Location Data โ€“ Krebs on Security

@briankrebs

Only days that end in "y":
"The fine amounts vary because they were calculated based in part on each day that the carriers continued sharing customer location data after being notified that doing so was illegal"

@AG100pct yeah that could be worded a little better, doh. thanks.
@briankrebs
I completely understood.
I was just commenting on how egregious the big boys are.
They will probably turn around and deny and act surprised.
Maybe even blame some interns

@briankrebs

If the Democrats win the presidency and a solid majority in both houses of congress, we must tackle data privacy rights. It is way past time for personal data rights to be enshrined in law analogous to the EU's GDPR.

@mastodonmigration @briankrebs @panamared27401 where is the list? Someone was keeping a long list of all the democratic bills that need to get rammed through immediately after they were scuttled by republican fuckery.
@briankrebs Left hand slapping fines for this activity while right hand is buying the data. Convince me it's not happening.

@briankrebs

It would be interesting to know how much revenue was generated from this illegal activity. Is $200M just a drop in the bucket? Are fines just a cost of doing this kind of business?

@mastodonmigration @briankrebs When GM was recently challenged for sharing driver behaviour information with third parties, one of the interesting takeaways was that the revenue stream for GM was, at least in their characterization of it, quite minor. There is no greater sin in USA than leaving money on the table, so there's that. In the case of GM, they may also have wanted to have some experience and develop some expertise in surveillance capitalism. The telecomms already got that.
@briankrebs why aren't the fines an actual disgorgement of their profit from these schemes? Why some arbitrary, low number - albeit meticulously calculated?
@briankrebs (the question was rhetoric)
@briankrebs this should be a corporate death penalty - lock up the entire C-suite, nationalize, and sell at auction.
@briankrebs is there anything you can do to stop cell phone companies tracking you this way? I assume you can't which is... upsetting.

@cflewis @briankrebs not carry a cell phone is the only thing I can think of

Or... Root your phone and do some location obfuscation. Even that only works so well because they can get rough location based on tower pings.

@briankrebs so have they just built consent into the contracts?

@briankrebs

I do not travel far, so my data would be redundant.

But, the cellcos do not care, they got to sell the redundant data over and over for profit.

@briankrebs The fine amount really should be reported in terms of their annual profits. IN THE HEADLINES. Fines should be levied in terms of their annual profits. Nothing will change till then.
@the_afflicted11 @briankrebs Fines should be proportional to gross revenue. If they were based on profits you'd just see other industries play the same game Hollywood does to deny that anything ever makes money.
@pstewart @briankrebs Yeah i forgot how amazon pays zero taxes. You have a good point. Charge more than atleast the revenue generated by the misuse of laws.
@briankrebs So how long before I get the new "Fsck The Customer" fee on my bill?
@briankrebs Talk about dragging out compliance!
@briankrebs Sure, but ban TikTok over privacy issues. ๐Ÿ™„
@briankrebs Unfortunately the size of the 'fines' are an order of magnitude too small to create any need for change.
@briankrebs Wow Doing the math on this one. Verizon was fined $47 Million. They have 115 Million Subscribers according to the attached factsheet. That is $0.40 penalty per subscriber. That sucks!
https://www.verizon.com/about/sites/default/files/Verizon_Fact_Sheet.pdf
@briankrebs Fuck this. The department of defense pays contractors to be the entities that the cellcos are "sharing" with.
@briankrebs @jsjoshua I wonder how that compares to what they made selling the data.
@briankrebs
@geoglyphentropy
๐Ÿ™„ No doubt they all profited way more than the fine!