“Though it seemed completely automated, [Amazon’s] Just Walk Out relied on more than 1,000 people in India watching and labeling videos to ensure accurate checkouts. The cashiers were simply moved off-site, and they watched you as you shopped.” https://gizmodo.com/amazon-reportedly-ditches-just-walk-out-grocery-stores-1851381116

[removes glasses; pinches bridge of nose; sighs until the heat death of the universe]

Amazon Ditches 'Just Walk Out' Checkouts at Its Grocery Stores

Amazon Fresh is moving away from a feature of its grocery stores where customers could skip checkout altogether.

Gizmodo

when Silicon Valley says “innovation,” it’s okay to mentally swap in “rendering labor invisible, while visiting new levels of precariousness and harm on the workers who perform it”

it’s a few more syllables, but i think it generally still scans

It’s important not to see this as happening to some “other” class of workers; these people are, first and foremost, *tech workers*. Without their labor — and the terrible conditions they labor under — these platforms would fail.

At the risk of being That Guy on main, a relevant bit from YOU DESERVE A TECH UNION:

(muting the thread now before my replies get too bonkers, pax vobiscum and whatnot)

“[Bezos’ wealth] is the result of deliberately hiding actual work – designing, making, sorting, packing, cooking, farming, delivering – behind little icons on your smartphone screen, in order to devalue it. It is the systematic use of the fake robot trick to lower the value of labour, until people are reportedly sleeping in tents at the factory gates, then banking the difference.”

Short, searing post from James Bridle on the real, human costs of automation: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/10/amazon-ai-cashier-less-shops-humans-technology

So, Amazon’s ‘AI-powered’ cashier-free shops use a lot of … humans. Here’s why that shouldn’t surprise you

This is how these bosses get rich: by hiding underpaid, unrecognised human work behind the trappings of technology, says the writer and artist James Bridle

The Guardian

@beep Oh that is so good.

"The size of Bezos’s rocket is very precisely determined by the difference in costs between paying a worker in Britain and a worker in India – including all the historically determined racist and colonialist inequality that calculation involves."

@jessamyn Every single graf is just *exquisite*, I’m real grateful to the friend who shared it with me.
@beep @jessamyn Deserved praise for @jamesbridle

@rrmutt

OMG did not know that @jamesbridle was on here

This makes me very happy; thanks!

@beep Just pick the size of trenchcoat, starting at XXXL
@beep The pointless complexity is the innovation. The harming workers is just a bonus!
@beep "I don't want to see the poors!"
@beep
🎯🎯💯💯🎯🎯

@beep

I got a lot simpler substitution than that. "Innovation" can almost always be swapped with "bullshit" with no loss of meaning (and often a gain). "Innovate" can be swapped with "waste money."

I realize that doesn't get to what you're getting at -- what David Harvey calls "capital's spatial fix" on this, but it's at least pithy.

@beep One of Brian Merchant's claims in *Blood in The Machine*—that capitalist "automation" has always meant pushing out an organized high-wage workforce in favour of low-wage invisible workforce. It was orphaned children in the time of the Luddites, it's African and Asian workers now.
@beep “disruption” equals breaking systems (and people) you never bothered to understand
@stubbornella @beep That and/or vaguely redefining things in order to dodge regulations
@beep Great ScFi story hit this in “The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer” - Neal Stephenson, 1995.
@beep actual innovation, it's a completely new type of dumbwaiter...
https://www.stuartmcmillen.com/comic/what-the-dumbwaiter-hides/
What the Dumbwaiter Hides - comic by Stuart McMillen

Thomas Jefferson invented the dumbwaiter to hide his slaves. Today, we use the 'dumbwaiter' of globalisation to hide the dark parts of our supply chains.

There's a reason AWS still runs Mechanical Turk, and it's not charity.
@beep Such a predictable SIGH
@beep This is wild. It's all smoke and mirrors
@beep AI is just someone else's brain
@beep absolutely embarrassing that I'm surprised by this news. 1000% should have seen this coming from a mile away.
@beep AI = An Indian

@gozzy @beep

It's SI - subjugated intelligence.

@beep here’s an interesting detail. This paragraph was altered after publication:

“Instead, Amazon is reportedly moving towards Dash Carts… These offer a more reliable solution than Just Walk Out, whose impressive technology was truly ahead of its time.”

This was despite their own findings. I wonder how that slipped through.

https://web.archive.org/web/20240402144834/https://gizmodo.com/amazon-reportedly-ditches-just-walk-out-grocery-stores-1851381116

@beep I want to find one just so I can constantly steal shit from it and be like "it's cool you just walk out here, ohh they got rid of that, whatever".
@beep i thought it was automated, that is insane and just an absolute waste of... something. everything. labor, energy, money, a secret fourth thing. it's a waste of a lot of things. such is the nature of big tech companies i suppose
@beep "they watched you as you shopped" no they didnt because my ass knows not to walk into a fucking amazon storefront
@beep it's always about labor, as in NOT PAYING AMERICAN WORKERS and finding bargain basement indentured workers they can exploit elsewhere.

@blogdiva Oof, I hear you. I might just add that there are *legions* of contracted tech workers here in the states, too. (I was lucky enough to speak with some for the book, even.) To a person, they all told me how dehumanizing their working conditions were, and how much anxiety it made them feel.

Anyway, that’s just to say it’s exactly like you said: it’s always about labor. And it just ain’t right.

💜

@beep ITS THE MECHANICAL TURK
@beep I'm pretty sure it's really easy to spoof those QR codes and just, ahh, help yourself to "free samples" of everything. 😈
@beep good god, is there any automation which is not of the potemkin variety?
@exchgr [unfurls massive scroll, which just has “NAH” written on it in massive letters] …well, let’s see here, hm
@beep WOW here all this time I figured that they had wild computer vision hard at work, but yeah. It's wild how much one can learn about a project once we're allowed to peak behind the curtain.

@beep

“The cashiers were simply moved off-site” and *that* is the point. If the cashiers are no longer part of your community, you no longer have *any* engagement or intersection with their living and working conditions, so the corp is now more free to treat them like shit.

The funniest part is that this is primarily being replaced with a system that basically puts the labor back onto you by merging self checkout with a shopping cart

https://www.amazon.com/b?ie=UTF8&node=21289116011

They went full circle

It also looks like the technology is being licensed to stores as well.

I just fail to see what problems this solves aside from serving you with more ads. It certainly won't reduce shoplifting rates

@beep
There's a tech sector joke that AI really stands for "Actual Indians".
If you just assume some new "disruptive" technology that's supposed to rely on automation is actually an obfuscated way to offshore jobs that have been resistant to it you'll be correct more often than not.
@beep Surely their goal was to achieve such a high degree of automation that they would eventually not depend on the folks in India. Conclusion: Modern computer vision/ML was not capable of doing this task. This is not surprising, since people evidently found it difficult as well. I'm surprised it took so long to reach this conclusion.

@beep

"In the late 18th century, The Turk was presented as an autonomous chess-playing machine that could beat any human player. It was a con – a chess grandmaster was always hidden inside it and making all of the moves – but the illusion succeeded because it was built on the exciting idea that a machine might be able to play a logical game against us. And win." https://www.thats-ai.org/en-GB/units/a-brief-history-of-ai

A Brief History of AI - That's AI

From ancient mythologies to present day astonishment, discover the history of artificial intelligence (AI) and the individuals who helped shape it.

@beep why does this keep happening 💀
@astrid @beep Because the idea is that in theory, you can use the manually labeled data to apply machine learning to it.

The problem is that's not always a thing that works.
@cocoa @beep oh I know how machine learning works

What I mean is just that so many times when a company advertises it's AI, it's actually just people behind the scenes. Like there was this one robot food delivery company on college campuses that turned out to just be people in the Philippines remotely piloting the robots
@[email protected] @beep It's only supervised learning if you think of them as actual human beings!

(edit: sarcasm, but... also, I'm pretty sure they don't think of them as actual people. I don't think they think of
anyone not in their socioeconomic class as actual people)
@aud @astrid @beep "A.I. will be the end of outsourcing!"
'Proceeds to replace it with a new more fucked up and evil kind of outsourcing.'
@astrid I always think about the delivery bots that are billed as autonomous, but are actually manually driven