“Though it seemed completely automated, [Amazon’s] Just Walk Out relied on more than 1,000 people in India watching and labeling videos to ensure accurate checkouts. The cashiers were simply moved off-site, and they watched you as you shopped.” https://gizmodo.com/amazon-reportedly-ditches-just-walk-out-grocery-stores-1851381116

[removes glasses; pinches bridge of nose; sighs until the heat death of the universe]

Amazon Ditches 'Just Walk Out' Checkouts at Its Grocery Stores

Amazon Fresh is moving away from a feature of its grocery stores where customers could skip checkout altogether.

Gizmodo

when Silicon Valley says “innovation,” it’s okay to mentally swap in “rendering labor invisible, while visiting new levels of precariousness and harm on the workers who perform it”

it’s a few more syllables, but i think it generally still scans

It’s important not to see this as happening to some “other” class of workers; these people are, first and foremost, *tech workers*. Without their labor — and the terrible conditions they labor under — these platforms would fail.

At the risk of being That Guy on main, a relevant bit from YOU DESERVE A TECH UNION:

(muting the thread now before my replies get too bonkers, pax vobiscum and whatnot)

“[Bezos’ wealth] is the result of deliberately hiding actual work – designing, making, sorting, packing, cooking, farming, delivering – behind little icons on your smartphone screen, in order to devalue it. It is the systematic use of the fake robot trick to lower the value of labour, until people are reportedly sleeping in tents at the factory gates, then banking the difference.”

Short, searing post from James Bridle on the real, human costs of automation: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/apr/10/amazon-ai-cashier-less-shops-humans-technology

So, Amazon’s ‘AI-powered’ cashier-free shops use a lot of … humans. Here’s why that shouldn’t surprise you

This is how these bosses get rich: by hiding underpaid, unrecognised human work behind the trappings of technology, says the writer and artist James Bridle

The Guardian

@beep Oh that is so good.

"The size of Bezos’s rocket is very precisely determined by the difference in costs between paying a worker in Britain and a worker in India – including all the historically determined racist and colonialist inequality that calculation involves."

@jessamyn Every single graf is just *exquisite*, I’m real grateful to the friend who shared it with me.
@beep @jessamyn Deserved praise for @jamesbridle

@rrmutt

OMG did not know that @jamesbridle was on here

This makes me very happy; thanks!

@beep Just pick the size of trenchcoat, starting at XXXL
@beep The pointless complexity is the innovation. The harming workers is just a bonus!
@beep "I don't want to see the poors!"
@beep
🎯🎯💯💯🎯🎯

@beep

I got a lot simpler substitution than that. "Innovation" can almost always be swapped with "bullshit" with no loss of meaning (and often a gain). "Innovate" can be swapped with "waste money."

I realize that doesn't get to what you're getting at -- what David Harvey calls "capital's spatial fix" on this, but it's at least pithy.

@beep One of Brian Merchant's claims in *Blood in The Machine*—that capitalist "automation" has always meant pushing out an organized high-wage workforce in favour of low-wage invisible workforce. It was orphaned children in the time of the Luddites, it's African and Asian workers now.
@beep “disruption” equals breaking systems (and people) you never bothered to understand
@stubbornella @beep That and/or vaguely redefining things in order to dodge regulations
@beep Great ScFi story hit this in “The Diamond Age: Or, A Young Lady's Illustrated Primer” - Neal Stephenson, 1995.
@beep actual innovation, it's a completely new type of dumbwaiter...
https://www.stuartmcmillen.com/comic/what-the-dumbwaiter-hides/
What the Dumbwaiter Hides - comic by Stuart McMillen

Thomas Jefferson invented the dumbwaiter to hide his slaves. Today, we use the 'dumbwaiter' of globalisation to hide the dark parts of our supply chains.