@angusm Doesn't it come down to objectives?
The former would scoff at the value of expanding the frontiers of knowledge. They see success in narrow terms of being on the "winning" team.
They see the latter as part of the opposition. Anything they (scientists, researchers) do is in support of the wrong (loser) team, and thus inherently not smart.
Logic based on incomplete premises about how society functions, leading to bad conclusions, but not completely bad reasoning.
This was todays update:
https://fosstodon.org/@AkaSci/112201347148130250
Attached: 1 image Great news on Voyager 1. Richard Stephenson of DSN Canberra reports that engineering data was being received from Voyager 1 last night at 40 bps. No science data yet, perhaps because they did not switch to the higher 160 bps rate, but this is a major step towards recovery and validates the diagnosis (failed memory chip in the FDS computer) and fix (rearrange software to bypass the failed memory area). Now waiting for a status update from NASA. 23/n
Attached: 1 image Great news on Voyager 1. Richard Stephenson of DSN Canberra reports that engineering data was being received from Voyager 1 last night at 40 bps. No science data yet, perhaps because they did not switch to the higher 160 bps rate, but this is a major step towards recovery and validates the diagnosis (failed memory chip in the FDS computer) and fix (rearrange software to bypass the failed memory area). Now waiting for a status update from NASA. 23/n
@angusm and that spacecraft is almost 50 years old. ๐
That sneakers likely don't even survive the first rainfall.
@angusm
Certainly.
But the ones that really worry me are the ones that have a foot in both worlds. How the hell can a brain take that level of dissonance and not catch fire?
Very nicely summarised ๐
Thanks!