This time I really finished.

All about about Legal Pundits and Outrage Industry, with a few cherished conspiracy theories carefully debunked.

The sections are linked and numbered.

Start here: https://terikanefield.com/can-democracy-work-in-america-part-1-there-are-no-yankees-here/

(If you get the error message, wait a few minutes and try again.

I know, I know. We keep running out of time and haven't tried the plugin someone recommended.)

The Misinformation-Outrage Cycle, Part 1: "There are no Yankees here!" - Teri Kanefield

This is Part 1. It’s generally best to follow the advice given to Alice and the White Rabbit in Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland: “Begin at the beginning, go on to the end, and then stop.” But if you must read out of order, here are all the links: Part 1: There are no Yankees here. […]

Teri Kanefield

@Teri_Kanefield
One other point I’d like to make:

“My point is that Tribe and Luttig are not behaving the way an expert should behave. Instead of trying to educate the public about the law and how it works, they are acting like advocates.”

After seeing https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/23986911-the-sweep-and-force-of-section-iii-baude-paulsen mentioned in an article, I took a deep dive into S214A.
1)

The Sweep and Force of Section III Baude Paulsen

@Teri_Kanefield
In Anderson v Colorado the #SCOTUS went directly against their “states rights” rationalization for overturning Roe v Wade, and shit all over their “strict originalist” charade.

What they did is no less than repeal a section of an amendment to the constitution without the constitutional process of passing through congress and ratification by the states.

The very eassense of “legislating from the bench” the right professes to hate so much.

‎Amarica's Constitution: What the Concurrences Should Have Said on Apple Podcasts

‎Show Amarica's Constitution, Ep What the Concurrences Should Have Said - Mar 12, 2024

Apple Podcasts