https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FQSFnZpsqw

Absolutely insane story of a Ukranian girl getting her face cloned & deepfaked into dozens of pro-Russian digital influencers on Chinese social media.

I fear this flood of AI shit is truly going to break the internet

Somebody Cloned Me in China...

YouTube
@Techaltar uncurated content leads to uncurated quality
@Techaltar Agreed. This will just result in no one trusting anything they see or read on the internet. Maybe print media will see a resurgence.

@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar if they print the deepfakes, it won't matter.

And to have printed media, you still need a decent backing to be able to produce it, and sell it even at the bare minimum profit.

@cyberrb25 @Techaltar Yep. Darn it. News is overrated anyway ..... ๐Ÿ™‚

@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar actual news and news reporters are fine. The issue is those who aren't, or who mask themselves as them.

One hard debate that needs to happen is that states (IMO) should be responsible for giving news and information gathering and filtering, and how it clashes with society and authoritarian (or authoritarian-inspired) regimes using it to brainwash, or censor news for, their population.

@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar I might have miswritten it: Governments should be mandated to have their citizens educated (either by themselves or by private or community entities, but to as much population as possible) on news and information gathering, not actually offering the news to them.
@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar you can still print faked images. In fact it's easier bc you can't print videos. The only advantage is that print media is often reputable sources. We've had reputable digital sources for a while but people prefer fake news
@sonicJazzMonkey
don't worry it will only be sane people who will stop trusting anything they read online. Half of the population will continue to trust every bullshit they see

@sonicJazzMonkey

You were trusting things you see or read online? And how is print media any better in this regard?

The only way to get through this era of total bullshit is to massively educate people so that they're capable of critical thinking instead of teaching them useless nonsense so that they can become better work slaves.

@Techaltar

@TobiWanKenobi @sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar

I don't think education is going to be enough - I think we're going to need something like networks of randomly selected juries who meet face to face - with access to experts, and budgets etc, to provide a transparent mechanism for deciding what is true.

@nicktaylor

We have such randomly selected juries and expert councils over here in Germany. Politicians not listening to them is one thing (because they are bought out by the oligarchs anyway), but even normal people will more often than not doubt expert opinions, because some random idiot, who used to work as a car mechanic and now supposedly taught himself into being some authority in science via Google University, tells people populist bullshittery on a Chinese propaganda app or US NSA app. And those people believe what he/she/it says because it "sounds correct" or simply confirms their propaganda-driven bias.

All of this stems from education in all countries being about producing work slaves. Children are taught math, language, and so on - 80% of stuff they won't ever need in their further life - to get ready for their future work life instead of social skills, how to shape your opinion, how to work with information, how to question things, how to live with nature, and so on. Teaching kids basic skills to get around in this complex world without being deceived by some random fascist propaganda on social media etc. would be a lot more healthy and wholesome for society than anything you can do with adults, who never learned how to think critically. Just look at how many people are supporting Trump and the GOP in the US. Think those people will ever care about some jury or experts?

Sorry, no. These people are for the most part lost to propaganda, fake-news, and lies.

The least we can do, besides trying our hardest to save this planet for future generations, is to try fix the educational system in a way that will prevent our children from having to deal with the same percentage of idiots running rampant in their generation.

At least that's something which should be achievable, even within this shitty system we currently have.

And sure, I don't dislike your idea and would love to see it implemented for political decisions etc., so don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to discard your idea here. ๐Ÿ™‚

@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar

@TobiWanKenobi

Are they run as citizen's assemblies?

These seem to be getting pretty good results in various places around the world.

This isn't expert-councils, this is 100-200 randomly selected people who can find their own experts. In Ireland they managed to break a never-ending deadlock over abortion rights, and wound up implementing policies that were a) what the general public actually wanted, and b) way more progressive than politicians would ever allow themselves to talk about.

It has been my experience that normal people when put into a jury stop being idiots and start behaving like intelligent humans. If you talk to people as though they're intelligent, you tend to get intelligence back.

I did jury duty before the Stupidity-Epidemic though. I would be interested to see how conspiracy theorists react in that sort of setting.

The closest I have come is volunteer work I did with Friends Of The Earth... about every 6 months a travelling circus would come round to give a talk - the Anti-Fluoride people. They tended to get ignored.

Do you have any more information about fact-checking juries or Citizens Assemblies in Germany?

@nicktaylor

Oh, both exist over here.

Citizen's assemblies exist on a national and federal level. Though the federal level depends a bit on how the federal states handles the decisions of the citizen's assemblies. I know my state doesn't have any citizen's assemblies, unfortunately.

On the national level, the theme-based citizen's assemblies naturally get more attention, but their decisions aren't compulsory or anything.

They are, in that sense, like expert-councils. They can discuss stuff and make recommendations, but it is up to the parliament to decide whether to adopt any of those ideas (mostly they ignore things since citizen's assemblies tend to choose things that go against corporate interests).

Just recently I read their recommendations about food in Germany and those were some pretty decent things.

This page should give you a first peek into it: https://www.buergerrat.de/en/

And yes, you're right. People are herd animals. So even if some conspiracy theorist gets randomized into such an assembly (and granted they decide to attend), I'd guess they'll act normally as long as the rest of the assembly treats them normally as well.

But I have no studies for this to back it up.

Citizens' Assembly

Website on randomly selected citizens' assemblies and sortition in Germany and worldwide

@TobiWanKenobi Thanks - that is really interesting
@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar Waiting for a cryptographic algorithm that allows a camera to generate a unique signature for an image in conjunction with the local date, time, and geographic coordinates, so we can at least verify that the contents of an image existed then and there. Still doesn't prove the image isn't fake, but at least can prove that it wasn't faked elsewhere/at a later time.
@sonicJazzMonkey @Techaltar I don't think print media would solve the problem. Print media already lost the public trust, long ago.
@Techaltar Maybe now we can all stop pretending that social media provided a high degree of trust in the first place.
@Techaltar not The Internet, just Social media.
@Techaltar @Gargron going to? I mean, there is hardly anything left to salvage as it is.
@Techaltar Not just the internet...

@Techaltar

Oh! There was a lovely photo of Biden and Obama in snappy bright pink suits on TV yesterday. Do you mean it was fake too? What about the one of Trump wearing bright orange, cleaning the prison floor? Surely that was real.

Okay, maybe I shouldn't joke but all the time there are people like Occupy The Web telling us that AI is a good thing, people are going to think it's a good thing. So long as we take apart everything we read to find the actual truth.

It hasn't changed that much.

@RosePuckey @Techaltar I suspect we are going to have to introduce deliberate spelling mistakes into our scripts to ensure that people realise it has been written by a human being and not a computer.
@peterbrown @Techaltar If only it was that simple. Even with perfect spelling, grammar and accurate, truthful content there are always the AI face swaps. Both of these took less than 90 seconds including having to watch the mind numbingly tedious adverts on the website, and taking a quick selfie. Fortunately its a face swap, my hair is a total mess at the moment.
@RosePuckey @Techaltar yes, there is a separate, and for well-known people much more serious, aspect in the field of imagery. I suspect only making a recognisable face automatically copyright of its owner, would even start to address this issue.
@peterbrown @Techaltar I very nearly made an AI image from your profile picture Peter. Just to show how easy it is to manipulate reality and how we really need to get away from this so called AI.
@RosePuckey @Techaltar I donโ€™t think weโ€™ll get completely away from it, but like a lot of new technology we will have to bring it under control. I have however believed for some time that we should have copyright of our own facial image, with or without AI.
Certainly, somebody can take my photograph in a public place, but if it is clearly identifiably me, I think it should be my copyright.

@Techaltar thanks for this, it's another argument I'll use to advocate end of universal access to AIs as here:

https://mfioretti.substack.com/p/the-only-thing-that-ai-tech-bros

(yes, I *know* it wouldn't block operations like this, but any little help would be good at this point)

The ONLY thing that AI Tech Bros actually created, and WHAT to stop about AI

because we'd really need some REAL AI, NOW.

Just an invitation...
@Techaltar but it's already broken, just don't know if fubar
@Techaltar @Gargron Media literacy. Very hard to acquire unfortunately. What helps is to take note of things that you see/read and not get worked up over it at all.
@Techaltar AI generated contact is still really obvious as it doesn't have the giveaway human quirks of speech, dialogue and movement. However, if content consumers and influencers have gotten used to presenting in a particular way, well that leaves them open to vulnerability. Same as we're now vulnerable to shitty clones of decent products on Amazon.
Real human contact, as ever, is crucial.

@Techaltar

This video is too well produced to be credible. There is something about it that seriously does not ring true.

And I have been playing with AI services for years, and have the IT credentials etc to credibly say "Yea, this is almost certainly happening, and at this point there is no point really in asking for links to the fake content, because it could just as easily have been produced as counter-propaganda to further muddy the water".

Which is a tactic - and yea, I agree that this flood of AI shit is going to break the internet. I think this video is part of that though.

@Techaltar use Zoom? Just wait until you're convinced you gave testimony to an event you can't recall because you, clearly, 'hit your head'.
@Techaltar Oh yeah. That. ๐Ÿคฆ๐Ÿปโ€โ™‚๏ธ

@Techaltar

itโ€™s already over. The open and useful internet is now polluted and poisoned.

Is time to organised accordingly.