JFC, people in tech are really out there saying that language models will be better at therapy, financial advice, and career advice than trained people.

WTF is wrong with you people? Do you really have no clue about what other people’s jobs actually involve?

Language models can’t even do maths how are they supposed to get good at financial advice?

And therapy? Just… 😑

What’s wrong with people in tech?

@baldur I thought all these use cases were already covered by blockchain?!

😁

@aguleb @baldur Blockchain has covered absolutely *no* use-cases except for “the need for blockchain technology to exist” and “to automate the waste of electricity to a comically absurd degree”.
@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur hear me out, blockchain AND AI, allt the computations are done in the blocks, which consists of different parts of the knowledgebase, ergo have different pricing! (I really hope nobody tries to do this)
@fredrik @enoch_exe_inc @baldur I think you're on to something. Way ahead of the curve! 😅

@enoch_exe_inc by that, do you mean that distributed ledgers are a bogus idea, or that only blockchain is a bad realisation and there are better ones, and if so, could you point me in that direction please?

@aguleb @baldur

@tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
People are prone to confusing a technology itself from its application in late stage capitalism.
Blockchain is an incredibly useful technology that's been steered toward evil.
@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur the useful pieces are all decades old tech with new jargon slapped on - you *could* call git or anything with a merkle tree or verifiable append-only history in it a "blockchain" if you squint hard enough, but you really shouldn't - since its mostly a marketing term for companies using that tech to do fraud
@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
I'm sorry, that's not true. It's incredibly easy, trivial, to forge a fake commit history.
You are saying "verifiable" as though that were somehow a trivial task. It's not.
The components of the technology for a verifiable distributed database existed decades ago. In fact the technology in labs existed decades ago.
A working system that actually does something didn't exist until 15 years ago.

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur its also "trivial" to forge a fake chain history - getting clients to accept it is the hard pard, but git clients *also* don't blindly accept forged histories - you need some way of handling fresh clones and deciding which *new* additions are valid, but for most applications you can just pick someone to trust.

the new bit was "trustlessness," but that doesn't solve a problem most (non-cryptocurrency) applications actually have

@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
You can fork a repo, rewrite the entire history, and publish it as your own.
The entire reason you can't just mess with the history is because a maintainer decides whether to bring it into the main branch.
That's not distributed. It's impossible for Github to both be distributed and verifyable. It can be only one.
Also, maybe go read the actual papers on blockchain from the 80's and 90's.
You clearly seem to have a misunderstanding of what the technology is, and continue to confuse its application under the capitalist hegemon for what the technology actually is.

Proof of Work, and Proof of Stake are not possible under any standard version control system, and AFAIK no system of proof exists for them other than through a central authority.

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur you know that git isn't the same thing as github right
@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
Are you intentionally being insulting?
@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur anyway you can totally apply proof-of-work to git, stripe did it as a ctf challenge a couple years ago - there was never a technical reason you couldn't, there's just no good reason to do it
@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
"stripe did it as a ctf challenge a couple years ago"
That's interesting.

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur https://github.com/ctfs/write-ups-2014/tree/master/stripe-ctf3/level1

there wasn't a mempool or anything but if you were really into the idea of proof-of-work version control there's no reason you couldn't take it further

write-ups-2014/stripe-ctf3/level1 at master · ctfs/write-ups-2014

Wiki-like CTF write-ups repository, maintained by the community. 2014 - ctfs/write-ups-2014

GitHub

@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

It's hard for me to imagine a system of federated micropayments, which we're going to need as the old internet dies, without resorting to some form of blockchain.
The alternative is a central authority.
I'd love to hear alternative ideas.
Though, I'll be honest, my complaint here is with the principle of attacking the technology and not the people wielding the technology.
A technology is just a tool.

@AeonCypher @cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur how would you use a blockchain for micropayments without being overwhelmed by gas fees and/or transaction delays?

@ShadSterling there are ones where those are less bad (though not eliminated) - I think the volatility is a worse problem - its not really that useful to accept payments in a currency you can't pay your *bills* with and may not be worth the same amount by the time you *can* exchange it.

stablecoins aren't a solution either - they *are* a central authority, and algostables (or generally any token pegged to *anything* off chain) *provably* can't guarantee they won't depeg.

@AeonCypher @cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur There are some odd assumptions in this reply. "... as the old internet dies" - the old internet is dying? How and why? In apparently such a manner that it won't support micropayments? We already have a bunch of micropayment services supported by banks. Banks are "central authorities", but what's wrong with that? Honestly, most of the arguments I see against "central authorities" sound more like people evading the argument for "We must keep our system of laws and government democratically accountable so that central authorities remain trustworthy".

@gfwellman @cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

How and why? - Because everything is going to be paywalled. Because AI can read things for you.

"it won't support micropayments? " - Micropayments currently exist from authorities. I said federated micropayments.

"We must keep our system of laws and government democratically accountable so that central authorities remain trustworthy"
I would _MUCH_ rather that banking, as in money creation, and for that mater payment processing were run by a competent government. I'm not holding my breath for that.

@AeonCypher @gfwellman @tivasyk I think money creation is not really a problem with a technical solution.

Decentralizing things at a protocol level *does nothing* to decentralize **power** - pretty much every chain of any size has far more drastic wealth concentration than most govt currencies and could be (and sometimes are) crashed by the actions of just a few individuals.

@cr8 @AeonCypher @tivasyk This makes the argument about power much better than I did. If we lose our democracy to a red-ballcap-wearing mob, the leaders of that mob are going to steal everything they can, like Putin-affiliated oligarchs. Federated micropayments will likely reproduce the wealth concentration problem that @cr8 described, and would probably just be taken over by oligarchs anyway.

I really do sympathize with the goal of "how do we keep our ability to conduct commerce away from central authority if the central authority goes full-fash". I just doubt that a blockchain could be kept free under those conditions.

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur proof-of-stake is too inherently tied to the concept of a crypto*currency* though because of the need to impose an extra penalty ("slashing") on elected validators that intentionally stall the system
@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
The way I would have intuitively made a distributed ledger is with a (Bayesian) trust network. I could never figure out how to get the maths to work on it for something like a distributed ledger.
The fact is, the people who are developing the technology have little incentive to make anything other than coins or bank-ledgers. At least currently.
There are a lot of startups trying to put the tech to creative uses, but I haven't seen any of them take off yet.
I'd give one example I know well, but I'd have someone mad at me for "sharing their idea".

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur i worked on a lot of similar pre-"blockchain" tech and then after it took off watched a lot of my ex-coworkers and peers go on to blockchain co's that I thought were at best producing clunky subpar products and sometimes just outright scams

the incentives are toxic - crypto is a space where investors don't have to wait for an "exit," and can profitably just sell hype so even well-meaning projects get turned into pump-and-dump schemes

@cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
Oof, yeah. That sounds rough. I definitely get the ire, hatred even, for the crytpto grifters.

Was your project using a trust network? Most people's eyes just glaze over at the concept. LOL

(Sorry if I was a bit aggro earlier. I'm having that kind of day.)

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur was mostly on things closer to a "private blockchain" than public one w/ adversarial consensus (didn't have to work with *totally* mutually distrusting parties - it was still verifiable, you couldn't undetectably change history - but we never needed a solution for a "cold start")

I generally like the idea of trust networks but I think the hard part of them is UX - its hard to make clear (especially to nontechnical users) what's happening.

@AeonCypher @cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur well, a working system that does anything else than cause climate catastrophe does not exist yet either
@StOnSoftware @cr8 @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur Proof of Stake systems don't do this. At lease not like proof of work systems do.
That being said, I'm not really interested in spending my time defending crypto.
@AeonCypher @tivasyk @aguleb @baldur As YouTuber suckerpinch put it, it (blockchain) is an elegant solution to the double-spending problem at a small scale, but is comically absurd when taken to its logical conclusion.

@enoch_exe_inc for every technology there exists a scope of efficiency outside of which it's application is suboptimal at best. not a valid argument in the given context.

@AeonCypher @aguleb @baldur

@tivasyk @AeonCypher @aguleb @baldur The scope of efficiency for blockchain-based cryptocurrency is, unfortunately, painfully limited if only a relatively small number of people can use it and only for a rather limited time before it costs more in electricity and hardware for computation than it’s worth to run a decentralised banking network.

@AeonCypher @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

Sounds like what was said about physics to a buncha people in Hiroshima.

@BigBadDog @tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
I was going to drop this, but it's just straight pissed me off.
Hiroshima is not a fucking joke. It's skin melting off of flesh as people walk the streets like zombies begging for water, but any water they can find only expedites their death.
It's mother milk poisoning babies, and shadows of people left behind.
The analogy is so wildly off base that I didn't call you disgusting as a matter of hyperbole. Your comment was horrifying to a level that is hard to put words to. You should absolutely be ashamed.
It's also ironic, because it disproves the very point you make. Japan is a country that heavily utilized nuclear energy after World War 2. Because it wasn't fission that snuffed out the beauty of life in a flash of destruction, it was the evils, and in some cases misguiding of men, that wrought this destruction.
It's however, so much easier to be lazy and target and blame the physics than it is to blame the military industrial complex, easier to point to fission, than to point to the complex web of imperialism that led to the war.
Just like it's so much easier to point to blockchain, than to ask why people are allowed to rob us of clean air. So much easier to point to bitcoin as a technology than to address the system that made bitcoin successful in the first place.
Kindly, fuck off.

@tivasyk @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

There are actually some *pre*-blockchain good uses of very similar distributed ledger tech. You can read up on Cassandra, a data-storage technology, for a fairly similar idea.

You're looking for keywords like "Merkle trees" and "Gossip protocol", though it's doing it in a cluster of storage servers, not (usually) worldwide.

@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

What about all the illegal commerce?

@dogfox @enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur
Blockchain's major use case is paying for crimes. LLM's major use case is generating SPAM.

They are both very good at those things.

@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur Don't forget "the need to enrich myself at the cost of others"

@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur I remember seeing on news that the brazilian ex-president got investigated on vaccine fraud due to the system being made with blockchain¹

In short, the data was edited (for illegal means), but the old history was still available because of how the whole system works (whose blockchain is only one of the components btw)²

Sources (I couldn't find any english good sources, sorry)

¹ https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/composicao/seidigi/rnds/a-solucao-tecnologica

² https://g1.globo.com/politica/noticia/2023/05/03/veja-como-funcionava-suposto-esquema-de-fraude-em-dados-vacinais-que-envolveu-ajudantes-de-bolsonaro.ghtml

A Solução Tecnológica

Ministério da Saúde

@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur

I think this is a case which, at least for me (casual person, not an expert), it seems to makes sense to use it because of the security, without any cryptocurrency BS.

In fact I think almost nobody really heard about that usage in the health system here until that investigation.

I believe that good uses exists, they're just ignored in news and social media bc it's not "magic money". Aparrently useful things are too boring to be talked about nowadays.

@enoch_exe_inc @aguleb @baldur Blockchain converts otherwise already wasted and/or stranded energy into financial value.

Something has to soak up the excess generated power from power plants that can't just ramp down (wind, solar, nuclear).

My local PUC is already doing everything it can to devalue my excess solar-power. I don't get any usable credit for excess solar I put into the grid over the month/year.

So, my stranded solar energy has a higher financial value mining.

@baldur tech is so sheltered from the real world. Many people in tech have never done anything else in their life and it shows and expresses itself in total disregard for other people's professions and skills.

(And the fact that many of them should go to therapy to understand a few things about themselves and why they feel the way they do but don't is just the cherry on top)

@tante Yeah. A lot clicked into place the first time I realised this.
@baldur @tante Yep this here. I've got out my bubble and realised the world doesn't work how we're told - like we're building a knowledge management system and I keep telling the bosses they just need to go to one of our factories to see a large proportion of workers are not digitally literate like we are sitting in our rooms, working from home. It's why I've not yet implemented any AI in our system, just good old fashioned human work.
The Tech Baron Seeking to Purge San Francisco of “Blues”

If Balaji Srinivasan is any guide, then the Silicon Valley plutocrats are definitely not OK.

The New Republic
@tante @baldur
It's also a matter of WHAT people in tech. Working in tech as a designer is often a humbling experience: no matter how carefully you model & design, you'll have to tweak and tune your design because (and you learn that) reality is more complex
But people who invest capitals in tech or people who just "have ideas" and then pressure other tech people to make that idea real and if they can't make it real it's them not working hard enough never learn that humbling lesson. Or too late

@Eh__tweet

I have met arrogant designers and humble programmers. Of varying ages and sexes, although usually SWM are the worst offenders. (I am a SWM who has to work hard to check his own arrogance).

@tante @baldur

@tante @baldur I think it's important to acknowledge that what some are saying about AI isn't representative of tech people as a whole. Individual devs are often sheltered, but there are many of us who think far more subtly about the risks and opportunities of AI, particularly LLMs.

LLMs are already affecting the way we work as devs and the systems we are building. This is mostly using the tech to automate parts of a system that are otherwise hard.

@tante @baldur
It feels a lot like 'I let my wife work as a therapist or historian to keep her busy, but I really look down on her work'

I find it weird how people convince themselves that 'i know stuff about computers that others do not know' makes them extremely smart, but then never extend that honor to the soft sciences ('today i learned something new about infant development, the person who told me that must be smart')

@Selena @tante @baldur
IME , corporate IT workplaces measured us against goals and deadlines. Soft skills are harder to prove and that seems to be why they can get overlooked.

I went to study fine art to explore my intuition and creativity and then worked in community engagement. I started to learn more about soft skills to cope with the extra mental and emotional work that those relationships require.

@baldur @tante Nope. The people pushing this are scam artists pure and simple.

Why do they not get called out about it? Most people in news media are incompetent when it comes to most things(pick something you know about and then start reading the reporting around it... it will be terrible... and that is will be no means an outlier, but the standard).

That problem is further made worse thanks to lots of mergers of media/news companies.

Which is further made worse via the 1980s making incompetent business decisions that value only the very short term the standard the world over.

@tante @baldur Yep, this, plus the collision of several other mind worms.

Engineer's Syndrome/Disease: "I am a expert in this specific technical field, therefore I can solve the problems of other fields too."

"When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a nail." You see this one all the time, with attempts to solve what are fundamentally hard social problems with tech silver bullets.

Motivated reasoning: tech people would make a lot of money if they really could replace experts from other fields with computers.

@tante @baldur

A part of me really wants the larger tech bubble to burst and witness how millions of tech workers scram to secure jobs in retail, nursing, farming, maintenance, manufacturing, and more, then finding out that hey these jobs actually require a ton of knowledge and skill.

Another part of me is scared to be part of such a diaspora, left with nothing but my senior high papers and no actual education in anything else than being self-taught in making pixels change color on a screen.

@tante @baldur This. I got told once that I'm a good artist and that I should pay my rent in commissions, while having no followers online.