Hi! 👋 Here's our #introduction.
We're BBC Research & Development; we explore and test new technology to discover how the BBC can best make use of it in the future.
For 100 years our engineers have been at the forefront of developments in broadcasting.
We're now researching how everyone could get TV & radio via the internet – along with all the flexibility and creativity that brings.
5G, AI, next-gen audio, UHD, personal data… we are investigating all these – and more!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rzztGFXYR1Y
We do all of this to bring audiences new, immersive and accessible experiences.
We also look at how technology can help the production process. We prototype and test new tools, create datasets, open-source our work, work with partners in the industry and publish our research so that everyone can benefit.
Find out more about all this on our website https://www.bbc.co.uk/rd
We’re now exploring Mastodon, so please follow us - we’ll update you with what we are working on in our labs.
🎺Toot Toot!🎺
Please verify your account. It is easy and costs nothing.
heads up: posting here hasn't been called TOOT'ing ever since lead Mastodon developer Grargrorn determined anything remotely fun or endearing must be scrubbed from the product.
consider as an alternative to those trumpet emojis, you could instead end that post with two 📰 emojis and say "Publish Publish!" everyone would like that very much.
@jackdaw_ruiz @BBCRD
Welcome to fediverse, BBC. We hope this is a sign that BBC are ready to embrace narratives around ethics of decentralised and federated systems even if they use some electricity.
When you say "#openSource, so everyone benefits" would that mean FOSS? If so you may be able to have apps listed in #FDroid and other places good software is found.
For a more correct fediverse icon for one's website:
http://git.disroot.org/fediOrigami/fediOrigami
We have attached the Peertube
@jackdaw_ruiz @BBCRD No. They're still called toots. We the users cannot let the developer dictate the adorableness of our platform.
TOOT TOOT. 🎺
Please see the results of my super-scientific poll here:
@zorinlynx @jackdaw_ruiz @BBCRD
In the Tusky app, the button to create a post is still labelled TOOT!

Are you going to find new ways to do surveillance, like you have implemented on your other web sites?
For instance, going to the BBC's website connects to many servers that only do surveillance tracking.
Are you going to bring that to the Fediverse?
See graphic I just generated now showing all the tracking your readers are subjected to.
Öffentlich-rechtlicher Rundfunk (#ÖRR) im Fediverse Aktualisiert am 03.06.2023 ▶️ DEUTSCHLAND @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] @[email protected] 🆕 @[email protected] ▶️ ÖSTERREICH (derzeit kein #ORF im Fediverse) ▶️ SCHWEIZ (derzeit kein #SRF im Fediverse) ▶️ #Rundfunkdatenschutzbeauftragte von BR, HR, MDR, SR, SWR, WDR, Deutschlandradio, ZDF: @[email protected] #ÖRRbewegen #ARD #ZDF #Rundfunk #Fernsehen #3sat #SWR3 #NDR #tagesschau #ÖRR #BR24
Good to see the BBC here.
It would also be good if, as a public service that doesn't advertise particular commercial products/services, you stopped posting on Twitter and similar - or at least stopped promoting them via links, logos, etc.
BBC One
BBC Two
BBC Toot?
Thank you for your service here David
Wouldn't it be nice if this was the first place they listened
Give me a lever long enough and a fulcrum on which to place it, and I shall move the world.
— Archimedes
Where
— "lever" is to be read as "allied moderation load sharing across instances"
— "fulcrum" as "coalition moderation policy with teeth"
@fishidwardrobe @davidgerard @BBCRD I don't like transphobia either, but claiming the BBC is editorially transphobic because it's occasionally included (intentionally or unintentionally) transphobic voices in its millions of hours of broadcast output is like claiming it's pro-armageddon because some people on the news supported renewing Trident. No media outlet with a decent amount of editorial independence gets everything right every time and there are a couple of real clangers on the Beeb's record as far as transphobic stuff goes, but that doesn't mean it's somehow policy. That's conspiracy theory stuff.
I'm not getting into what is and isn't transphobic - that is far above my pay grade, it's for trans people to decide and certainly not me (although I appreciate help understanding what and why because whew, when it comes to privilege I tick almost all of the boxes except the mental health one) and I'm certainly not interested in policing other peoples' responses. That's not an interesting conversation. But at the same time, this kind of 1+1=20 approach doesn't seem to help at all.
@m @davidgerard @BBCRD The key word here is "editorial". Someone chose to air those voices. That was a bad choice. The BBC has a history of "both-sides"ing things that it really, really should not.
It has a duty to address that in a grown-up way and not duck the issue. We have a duty to hold them to account – again, in a grown-up way.
-BBCRD
We both agree on that, for sure. What I don’t see as holding anyone to account, though, is the idea that you hold people to account in a community by being weirdly confrontational at them the moment they appear, especially when the people you’re doing that at have no link to what you’re talking about. Hence my response to things like immediate demands for social.bbc to be fediblocked.
Trust but verify remains a great rule of thumb. Sure, there are certain individuals and organisations who’ve shown that they can’t be trusted not to say horrible things at all. If garbage people like Andrew Tate show up here my tiny instance will block them on sight and probably the instance that was unwise enough to give them an account as well. But I don’t think I’d put the Beeb in that bucket and certainly not their R&D department who are a bunch of nerds with a huge record of inventing some of the core technologies driving broadcasting and none at all of saying contentious things on the news.
If, even just for one moment, you listen to trans people, many of us are going to tell you that the BBC is institutionally transphobic at this point in time.
Sure, there are well meaning people there, but their overall policy is not in a good place.
It isn't a case of "the odd clanger" - it's the whole approach, and the language used to discuss us.
@JustFaith @m @fishidwardrobe @davidgerard @BBCRD
The BBC, Guardian, Labour Party, and UK appear to be institutionally transphobic.
We expect the right to be transphobic in the US. The TERF Island difference is the center-left also being majority transphobe.
@samthurston @JustFaith @m @fishidwardrobe @BBCRD you could certainly argue the concept of a federation with social rules that it enforces by shunning repeat bad actors from first principles here, indeed you could just federate with gab.ai in the hope of converting them through logic and reason
or the rest of us could not do that
@samthurston @JustFaith @m @fishidwardrobe @BBCRD
> BC probably just responds to market forces.
if you are literally claiming that the BBC's editorial transphobia is "market forces", then you are an idiot or a liar.
That's one of the biggest challenges in talking about the impact of institutional transphobia - lots of people who aren't impacted by it, wanting to make their thoughts and opinions known.
While nobody listens to the trans people who are directly impacted.
@JustFaith @davidgerard @m @fishidwardrobe @BBCRD
Well I am directly impacted inasmuch as my kids are... And my statement was probabilistic not definitive. I'm here to learn though.
@davidgerard @BBCRD I elaborated on my reasoning in this thread (and I am a trans person).
#Fedi: Hey let’s get news outlets on the Fedi to run their own instances to free everyone from centralized social networks and reduce misinfo in the world! #BBC: ok cool we did that now what? Fedi: We’re defederating with you because you, like all other major news outlets ever, have been racist and transphobic sometimes! We don’t want you! Leave now! 😒