AI has already been used to run scams, rip off artists, destroy search engines, and drown publishers under an avalanche of shit.

Now AI boosters found a new thing to enshittify: #UserResearch .

"AI research is better than nothing" is the latest in a long series of "bad research is better than nothing" arguments that miss the point of research in the first place.

#UXDesign #softwaredevelopment #ProductManagement

https://spavel.medium.com/no-ai-user-research-is-not-better-than-nothing-its-much-worse-5add678ab9e7

No, AI user research is not “better than nothing.” It’s much worse.

There is an invisible reader of every article, whose gaze counts for far more than 1 view, 1 read, or 1 “like.” That reader is, of course, the algorithm. Between search engines’ page-ranking…

Medium
@PavelASamsonov AI research ... someone pls tell them that they are outsourcing their critical thinking to a glorified copying machine with a lacking conceptual understanding of fact.
@pellechristensen This is me trying to do that - although I wrote about the same thing a year ago and it hasn't stopped them so maybe I am doing something wrong https://spavel.medium.com/gpt-isnt-going-to-replace-designers-but-it-s-coming-for-the-users-40bf0a0c08b3
GPT isn’t going to replace designers. But it’s coming for the users.

ML models have reached a degree of sophistication that has some people proposing to interview AIs as though they were users. This is not a *new* mistake: design has a legacy of struggling with "user proxies" that we must put to rest.

Bootcamp
@PavelASamsonov there is no cure against "oh new and shiny" enthusiasm. It has to run its course and do some damage before some people get it.