My wife is disabled. Together, we have raised a child, a lovely young man.
I am also a writer.
I also worked full time at a non-writing job until early retirement in 2019.
Yes, I could have written more if I was a selfish arsehole who left them to fend for themselves.
I'm not able to do that. My writing is not more important than them.
@RickiTarr His first wife wrote similar books but he divorced her in 1984. It seems like a fair amount of what was in the book was rehashed from Deborah Tannen's book called - You Just don't Understand.
@RickiTarr FIVE DAYS
criminy, I had a c-section and at 5 days postpartum I was still wildly anemic from surgical bleeding and not able to stabilize my core enough to bend over a changing table to change a diaper
@dbsalk @RickiTarr Yep, it's one of the best episodes of "If Books Could Kill" yet!
If Books Could Kill: Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus
Episode webpage: https://www.patreon.com/IfBooksPod
Media file: https://www.buzzsprout.com/2040953/12115974-men-are-from-mars-women-are-from-venus.mp3
Ah yes, metrosexual -- the ridiculous idea that a man might take some care in his appearance and some joy in his life.
I think the screaming was part and parcel of the outsourcing of labor from men to women, and the keen desire by many men to keep it that way.
"Looking good is HER job, but it's also her job to make sure I look good, and to tell me when that is, and also to do the dishes, laundry, raise the child, vacuum, cook, support me in all things...."
"Metrosexuals" were men doing "women's work" by being fully capable of competently handling their own styling and grooming, and by merely existing it showed men who relied on the women in their lives to nag them into clean clothes and regular haircuts were just being lazy.
And so of course the long-running joke about metrosexuals is that they were gay. Both because it was "feminine" to be able to handle that, but also because obviously only men who didn't have women in their lives would need to.
Processed through LinkedIn’s “Rewrite with AI” feature:
Why?
Sadly, I think the book was effective at one thing ... verifying the priors of far too many people.
Side-note: it's a horrifying testament to how incredibly easy it was (and, arguably still is) for people to overlook abusive behavior when they "like" a person (or what that person is doing or saying).