What a headline!
Why is Colbert one of the sanest Americans?
@roberttsai @NewsDesk Biden might want to take advantage of that…
@michaelgemar @roberttsai @NewsDesk yup, if this argument holds up, Biden calls Seal Team 6 the very next day, right?
@Conville @michaelgemar @roberttsai @NewsDesk Democrats control the Senate. Democrats control more than 1/3 of the House. By Trump’s reasoning, Biden could immediately order the killing of Trump, every major Republican candidate for president, every Republican governor, every Republican Senator and Representative, and even if they are all replaced by Republicans immediately, if Democrats didn’t agree to impeach/convict, he’s fine.

@michaelgemar @roberttsai @NewsDesk

I have been hoping that the SCOTUS agree with this idea and Biden immediately has the 5 execrable Justices sent to Guantanamo.

@roberttsai Did they really think that would be a winning agreement?
Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity 

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive&…

The Hill
@Chip_Unicorn @roberttsai I think the guy on the left is praying to God he is not collateral damage when tRump is hit by lightening.
@Chip_Unicorn @roberttsai it is incomprehensible tRump is not gagged & imprisoned
😲 Did one of them say that out loud instead of using their inside voice?

@pkboi

Trump’s attorney, John Sauer, tried to convince the judges that unless a president has been convicted by the Senate in a formal impeachment vote, he cannot be criminally prosecuted for actions he took while in office.
The judges appeared skeptical of this line of reasoning.
“You’re saying a president could sell pardons, could sell military secrets, could order SEAL Team 6 to assassinate a political rival” with impunity, said Judge Florence Pan, who was appointed by President Joe Biden.

@tdwllms1 @pkboi
#this
It’s such obvious bullshit.
Can you imagine being the appeals attorney reduced to making this argument? You spent decades in school, training, practicing, earning the right to argue before an appeals court, and that’s what you’ve got?
Or his other one about how courts don’t sit in judgment of presidents yet in the next breath that same decision notes presidents can be criminally prosecuted?
Im embarrassed for him and I don’t even know him.

@JoeStewart @pkboi

I can’t even imagine what the three judges did-said in chamber after they laughed and laughed and laughed… then just stared at each other…. Wtf next…

@tdwllms1 @JoeStewart @pkboi

Nervously chuckling about the sheer audacious absurdity for one of two potential heads of state come 2025 to be in your court making this argument.

@JoeStewart @tdwllms1 @pkboi

Trump lawyers, erudite, need to get a pair. They knowingly obstructed justice by backing crazy stuff from trump cesspool in front of the justices in DC, who command the same veneration as by Scotus.

@roberttsai So is he just out there suggesting that Joe Biden can assassinate him and that will be covered by presidential immunity? Damn, if that's the case...

Seriously, I think this is just another indication that he is suffering from progressive dementia, first because he even believes this, but second, even if he does believe it why would he be putting that out there now when he's not in power? Does he think he's going to be ressurrected if someone kills him?

I sure hope the Surpreme Court justices will take note of this if/when they decide any cases on the limits of presidential immunity!
#executiveimmunity

@roberttsai

It was mind blowing listening to this....

@roberttsai Well then Joe Biden should be briefing Seal Team 6 just in case the decision goes Trumps way, huh?
@roberttsai .....hahaha....can't make it up!!

@havvyhh2 @roberttsai

Have to see if The Onion can top this. Doubt it.

@roberttsai

If he wins he loses....

@roberttsai in regard to #Trump , most behaviour is…
Taste
Absence of decent moral and ethical standards
@roberttsai But they're pro-life and keeping us safe from terrorists.

@roberttsai

Ok. Listen, Joe. You are in charge.

@roberttsai before the arrival of Trump on the political scene, this headline would have belonged in a dystopian novel. The sad truth is the shock value which it should hold (for it describes the epitome of a fascist regime) has been drained by years of Trump’s constant batshit verbal utterings.

How does the US protect itself from a rogue ex-President seeking re-election? Are we witnessing the constitutional cogs whirring into protective action? If not, then how? The stakes cannot be ignored.

@roberttsai

FFS… lock this lunatic up, and remove his gang from the bar…

Or tell Joe he has Carte Blanche now!

@roberttsai is he imagining something like a pensioner version of the hunger games?

@roberttsai

Didn't he telegraph this before on his quotables before he was elected.... also waaaaaaay before he launched his Telegraph Social, didn't he, about '5th Ave and Shootings' , etc, in NYC?

Edit: Yep. 2016
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/donald-trump-fifth-avenue-comment/

Donald Trump 'Fifth Avenue' Comment

Donald Trump caused controversy by claiming he could "stand in the middle of 5th Avenue and shoot somebody" and retain all his supporters.

Snopes
@roberttsai
A little voice is yelling "Clear and present danger", in constitutional terms
#treason #trumpcrimes
@roberttsai
The only reason to make this argument is to present it as a legal flaw that needs to be fixed.
@roberttsai So why didn't he do that while he was president?
@roberttsai
Dark Brandon: “That’s a go, Seal Team.”
@roberttsai @Jorsh If the courts make it legal, I know where our very next cruise missile attack should be...
Trump team argues assassination of rivals is covered by presidential immunity 

Former President Trump’s legal team suggested Tuesday that even a president directing SEAL Team Six to kill a political opponent would be an action barred from prosecution given a former executive&…

The Hill
@roberttsai Totally normal. I'm sure that's exactly what the Founders had intended. /s
@roberttsai that's quite the theory - I wonder if that also covers assassination of, say, federal judges on apellate courts
@roberttsai he wants to be just like Putin
@roberttsai if you listen to prosecuting Donald trump, the whole thing was very surreal. I don't want to believe there are people who literally do anything for money, but how can you stand up in court in front of a judge and say "the president can assassinate someone and they're not liable for it" with a straight face.
Matt Ferrel (@[email protected])

Wilhoit's law: “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect."

Mastodon @ SDF
@roberttsai I don't like this trailer. I think the movie is going to suck too.

@roberttsai Do you close the headline of the year competition early in these circumstances @paulisci ?

#HeadlineOfTheYear

@roberttsai

“Sauer later argued the threat of prosecution could have a chilling effect on future presidents’ decisions, saying they would need to look over their shoulder and ask, “Am I going to jail for this?” when making controversial decisions.”

In a perfect world, laws would have chilling effects. :-)

@roberttsai
Hey, Joe, where you going with that gun in your hand?

@roberttsai So, does that mean that once Trump is nominated, he, his family, his security team, and their families need to find a bolt hole to hid in, because if Trump can assassinate his rivals, so can Biden.

And there's no place on this planet where a group that large could hide without some security gap. Trump could throw everyone but his security team under the bus, but the team still has family and loved ones. He'd best pick the lamp post he wants his body to hang from, along with the rest of his team.