@DrakkenZero i guess RTing the original toot might be better than the shitty sky copycat 😬
@DrakkenZero i guess RTing the original toot might be better than the shitty sky copycat 😬
Attached: 1 image Wake up babe, Godwin's Second Law just dropped
@DrakkenZero I think it would be better as a second law if it said "will turn out to be a Nazi" since the vast majority of those suffering from Woke Derangement Syndrome align themselves with the Nazi branch of American conservatism.
I think George Carlin got it right with his quip on the American Dream being called that because you have to be asleep to believe it. Which is probably why the anti woke brigade are so deathly afraid of being woke.
"They never woke up / from the American dream."
Melissa Etheridge, Nowhere to go
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yFAQ7o-dk6E
I don't know.
Godwin's Law (the first) helped me develop my debate skills. When I couldn't just say "this is like Hitler" but instead had to resort to things like "it's hard to find any good things with these policies... poverty will rise, among other things".
Even as fascism is on the rise, I find it more helpful to speak of the results of these policies instead of referring to shorthand, as pop culture has mixed the actual Nazi policies with fictional stuff.
@iju @tb @DrakkenZero @hypebot
Clarifications by Godwin on the first law:
"If you're going to compare somebody to Hitler or the Nazis or raise the specter of the Holocaust, be sure you’ve got your facts right." [1]
"What's arguably worse than Trump's frank authoritarianism is his embrace of dehumanizing tropes that seem to echo Hitler's rhetoric deliberately." [2]
[1] " 'Trump Knows What He’s Doing': ... the Hitler Comparison Is Apt ": https://archive.today/2023.12.22-083134/https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2023/12/19/godwins-law-trump-hitler-00132427
@boud @tb @DrakkenZero @hypebot
While true, these clarifications came out about 25 years after I started arguing online :)
@iju @tb @DrakkenZero @hypebot
Slightly off-topic: I wonder if the following hypothesis (law? ;)) has already been formulated (or studied formally):
"De facto moderators of *non-public* online discussion (e.g. non-public email threads) will more likely use logical fallacies in summarising the discussion than moderators of *public* online discussion."
My guess is that the difficulty for researchers to study the hypothesis would be access to the non-public threads.
@tb @DrakkenZero @hypebot Godwin's Law doesn't say that it's *incorrect* to compare someone to Hitler, only that the probability of it happening trends towards 1 as an argument proceeds.
It was Leo Strauss who came up with the idea that it was necessarily fallacious to compare someone to Hitler.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/12/20/godwins-law-trump-hitler-comparisons/
I've been saying this for a while.
It’s the same with people claiming to be anti-communists. Like, I get it. I don’t like Marxists-Leninists and Maoists too, but people claiming that are generally asswipes.
This seems generalizable to many other cases of someone using a word that means something good, as if it means something bad. Examples: pathetic, rude, queer, weirdo, slut, science, feminism, anarchy, communism. What other examples can you, dear reader, think of?