The early bird gets to throw the first stones.
Has all of the pieces of the original article been repaired and recycled into a new article? ππ€·ββοΈ
No but Thomas Hobbs would understand my query π
@freequaybuoy Then consider the following scenario: I own a boat. Over time, I've replaced every single part of the boat, from the sails to the hull, but it still has the same name (title), the same registration number in the Register of Shipping (database id), and the same overall measurements (metadata). By your own argument, it's still the same boat.
@freequaybuoy what people fail to realise is that i have been collecting discarded ship parts, and can now build a second and extremely fucked up ship.
@freequaybuoy @TerrorBite @wikipedia In Tsindoku, Bin Chul Han talks about the ancient temples of Japan, wich suffer?/benefit? from the same practice. The western view is that if no ancient part remains, the object is a replica, but I see Old Athens and modern Wikipedists have another view.
Nice metareference.
@TobyBartels I'm trying to work out what this means
@julienbidoret
In that case, is it still the same Wikipedia?
You know it's like rain on your wedding day, right? Or a free ride, when you've already paid?
Ah, the infamous Web Article of Theseus.
How many full replacements though?
<chefβs kiss>