@petealexharris @keydelk @gwynnion
Oh dear. What a world this is becoming. 😞
@gwynnion i remember first realizing this when Clarkesworld had to close submissions because they were getting inundated with LLM spam.
someone had clearly, at some point, made a get-rich-quick guide that positioned short fiction mags as reverse vending machines--insert wordcount, receive cash. and a whole bunch of other people believed that person, because they didn't read short fiction (or much of anything else).
I DON'T LIKE SPAM
@gwynnion I've been an almost daily user of LLMs for over a year and I promise I'm not using them for spam
I use them as a thesaurus, a coding assistant, (weirdly) a brainstorming partner - they are a rubber duck that talks back to me
I think generating text for publication is one of the least interesting applications if the technology, though I get why professional writers tend to assume that's their main use
And maybe it is! They're incredible spam machines for people who want to do that
LLM is perfect for this, instant generation of text etc supporting whatever line you want to push.
Trump's adviser Steve Bannon said their aim was "to fill the media with shit" in order to prevent proper oversight of the government, and LLM is tailor-made for this task.
@gwynnion I think the best positive use case is translation, including writing descriptions of images/video, and transcriptions. Such tasks can be tedious for people, but easy to verify after the fact, so we can feel pretty comfortable trusting machines to do it.
Analyzing images for patterns that defy human recognition can be put under this umbrella, too.
But, yes, confabulation, deception, and "flooding the zone" are dark timeline applications.
Time for regulation!
@gwynnion@mastodon.
I love LLMs, or Anthropic's Claude at least. I bounce ideas off of it and use it to zero on subjects to research. I understand there are limitations and that the devices are inseparably prone to confabulation, but they work well for me.
That said, they can also be used to produce mountains of convincing-sounding garbage, and that there are serious IP-facing issues with the garbage they create.
@robotistry
@gwynnion I'd argue that making a comms channel useless by drowning it in shit is the point.
Already happened with traditional news outlets; now the money is coming for the internet. "Knowledge is power and nobody else should have any", more or less.