The German eXit from Musk's hate platform is real and ongoing.

I'm seeing accounts for newspapers, courts, libraries, radio stations, cities, nonprofits, etc. getting shut down permanently or moved into maintenance mode. This is all very organic, e.g., the city of Cologne had a vote on withdrawal from X:

https://ratsinformation.stadt-koeln.de/getfile.asp?id=956920&type=do

I can barely keep up. Many of these accounts are now on the fediverse. The ones I've tracked so far are in the eXit spreadsheet:

https://bit.ly/eXit

I'm not seeing a similar domino effect in the US yet, but the complete eXit of the Trevor Project (not active here yet) and the partial eXit of @indivisibleteam could set the stage for more large accounts to follow.

As the Trevor Project noted, X is not a safe platform. Orgs posting on X risk exposing constituents to harm. By stack-ranking paying accounts above everyone else, Musk has worsened abusive behavior, because abusive accounts can pay to amplify their abuse in everyone's timelines.

It's easy to feel powerless. "Well, what can _I_ do to make things better?"

One simple thing we all can do is help accelerate the demise of X before Musk fully weaponizes it for fascism, hate and abuse.

Please speak up in your organizations, your communities, your networks, and help folks get off X completely.

There's a reverse network effect. Every person or org shutting down their account makes it easier for the next person or org to do the same.

@eloquence

> Musk has worsened abusive behavior, because abusive accounts can pay to amplify their abuse in everyone's timelines.

It is considerably worse, in fact. Ex-Twitter subscribers not only get promoted ahead of non-paid accounts, but also they get paid by ex-Twitter for any posts of theirs that get a lot of engagement.

In other words, there are strong incentives to post the worst, most emotionally triggering stuff possible, as that gets engagement, which means pay outs.

@eloquence so if you're a fact-checking org, you presumably don't pay for the account, spend hours researching stuff before you post, your posts are not amplified as much, and you don't get paid.

If you're a misinfo/disinfo peddler, for a few dollars/month you can churn out a lot of posts, A/B test what "bites" the most quickly, find the golden formula of the day, have your posts amplified, and *actually get paid* for your trouble.

It's obscene.

@rysiek @eloquence but at least it is relatively transparent. Nothing about what drives engagement is different but at least now no one thinks they are in it for the LULs
@eloquence i have a theory that musk/jack set this deal up in order to conceal/destroy evidence that Twitter actively engaged in election interference. They had to take the company private. Now, thats not the only reason, but i think thats why it was done when it was done.

@eloquence oh I’m excited for when I renew my USAA auto policy and they tell me my premium has gone up again because of inflation. I can’t wait to rip into them for being willing to pay $1000 a month for a gold checkmark on Twitter then trying to pass that cost on to me. Nope. Two years ago I enjoyed ripping into them for advertising on Fox News after the insurrection. The rep I talked to was cool. She was like “yeah we are on a recorded line so I can’t voice my opinions, but preach.”

BTW, it’s ALWAYS appropriate to deadname that shithole Nazi platform.
#twitter

@maggiemaybe

Re: "deadnaming" X, I know, but I'm intentionally going along with the rename. Folks who are attached to Twitter need to realize it's well and truly dead.

To quote Ghostbusters: "There is no Dana, only Zuul" - there is no Twitter, only the awful hate site called X. If Musk wants to piss away all the goodwill that's accreted to the brand he bought for $44B, I say, let him. :)