It's funny: Both Bandcamp and Patreon had the easiest and most straightforwardly long-term profitable business models imaginable: Sit between indie creatives and their fans, provide some basic services for mediation (comment sections, media posts, semi-global payment) and take enough of a cut of any payments to cover the costs and then some.

But because that business model wouldn't scale forever, they are instead being gutted, because ever _increasing_ growth is the only model capital accepts

Incidentally, this also harkens to one of those times that Matt Levine Doesn't Understand Capitalism - he's been repeatedly stumped by why crypto firms like Coinbase or Tether keep making risky bets with customer money when they could just.. Not do that, and still make a handy profit from putting customer money into liquid rate-making bonds and live off the interested (since the customers see zilch of that).

>

I think the fundamenral misunderstanding is that Levine thinks of these crypto 'institutions' as classic capital - they get (more) money from owning things and managing funds, and should be fundamentally insulated from market instability - whereas the crypto people see themselves as a tech startup, meaning they should have YoY growth _every year_, which fixed-rate, liquid bonds can't necessarily yield.

@pettter I was disappointed to see it sold a second time to a music licensing company. Don't know much about them but hope they aren't there to change the way it works.

But Bandcamp is/was a great model and service to bands.

@arcadiarhod They've immediately fired half the company, unfortunately.

@pettter I read that today. But yeh as you mentioned perfect business. With a united workforce. But no one was thinking of the shareholders! Step one is always fire staff.

I just love the service and hope it can still serve it's purpose to the artists

@arcadiarhod @pettter it's so weird that they ever *needed* shareholders though, right? I feel like you could get one of these apps off the ground without venture capital and having done so there's surely no reason you need to grow it faster than organically?
@andrewt @arcadiarhod @pettter some of it may be "the culture": you start an enterprise, so you feel you are expected to ask for investment to start up, but then that escalates as the initial investors want out with a profit.

@bovaz @andrewt @arcadiarhod @pettter

And some reaons might be simply things like loans, public grants, etc.

In most cases, you have to define a "scalable", "profit-oriented" business model to get funding.

A few months back, I tried to apply for a public grant to start a company that provides IT services to non-profit organizations.

The grant was about "social entrepreneurship" and had all the buzzwords ("inclusive", "social justice", etc.).

Main critique point in the feedback to my application: Not scalable "enough".

@pettter @arcadiarhod if the staff that was fired would start a cooperative equivalent of bandcamp I'd back it.
@vanderZwan @pettter @arcadiarhod Unfortunately, they'd need investments for that, and the people who'd infest to such a startup would want to see ever increasing profits, and we'd be back to square oneโ€ฆ

@sbi @vanderZwan @pettter @arcadiarhod

Most co-operatives fund themselves, or issue long-term bonds to raise their starting capital.

@sbi @pettter @arcadiarhod There's an entire cottage industry of crowdfunding platforms through which people have successfully launched projects that suggests otherwise.

If I'm a customer for the service they provide then that's a form of investment, isn't it?

@vanderZwan @sbi @pettter @arcadiarhod
I think the key would be getting enough critical mass of artists on, who would hopefully be networking with others currently on bandcamp. Also, bandcamp isn't bandcamp without the editorial team. You need people who just honestly love music writing those features, otherwise it's just ad copy.

You can do all that with a co-op, but it wouldn't be easy to get it self-sustaining, both in terms of organizing and initial funding

@jaawerth @sbi @pettter @arcadiarhod I think I get what you mean: you don't want a situation that is basically Monty Python's "constitutional peasants" played out unironically, right?

OTOH, I think the "passionate editorial team" part is likely easier to maintain in a coop than in a company where you know your new bosses are more interested in maximizing their profits than in music

@pettter @arcadiarhod Oh no, I need to read up on that. Such a shame. Bandcamp felt like one of the nice indie companies. I didn't realise they got caught in the VC trap
@pettter @arcadiarhod oof thanks I dislike it intensely

@pettter I remember were some very insightful interviews with the people who founded Gumroad about what separates a sustainable business model from all the things VC-money entails and how as a founder it's quite difficult to disengage with the respective narratives and framing.

Also telling,how "lifestyle business" is a pejorative silicon valley framing for non-hypergrowth ideas.

@pettter How are they being gutted?
@TheFerridge Half of bandcamp staff got fired yesterday. Patreon announced and then partially walked back pricing changes that would have massively impacted smaller creators.
@pettter @TheFerridge I knew it wasn't going to end well when Bandcamp first sold itself to Epic Games. Where am I going to get my legitimate MP3s now?
@EdanOsborne @pettter @TheFerridge back to SoundCloud? lol Hopefully someone produces another service like bandcampโ€ฆsigh
@pettter @TheFerridge what is your opinion on liberapay? Is it a viable alternative to Patreon?

@pettter This SO much.

The thing about the phrase "ever increasing growth" is that if you don't think about it at all, it kinda sounds remotely reasonable. Like obviously incredibly greedy, of course, but capitalism gonna capitalism, you know?

But if you think about it even for a second, it's just abject insanity; the need to not only consistently make a lot of money, not only consistently make incresingly MORE money, but the need and drive to always keep accelerating the speed at which the amount of money you make increases.

It's like the grains of rice on a chess board from the old proverb; it's mind-blowing there are THOUSANDS of people in the world who fully expect they'll just keep increasing their dragon hoards exponentially in perpetuity ๐Ÿคฏ

@shi @pettter well, same lesson from the pandemic โ€ฆ people need to learn what exponential actually means in practice.
@pettter @maegul @shi thereโ€™s nothing intrinsically wrong with exponential growth, as long as the exponent is small enoughโ€ฆ
@BenAveling @maegul @shi Even linear growth is bad if it continues on forever.

@pettter @BenAveling @maegul @shi forever growth is why both Ponzi schemes and pyramid schemes are fundamentally scams.

Even tech companies must eventually slow to growing only as much as the economy as a whole at some point.

@BenAveling @pettter @maegul @shi That depends on how far out you look. For instance, 1% per year doesn't sound like much, but over a century it'll nearly triple the size of the growing things.
@pettter This doctrine of ever increasing growth is just POISON in every way. I wish I knew how we could stop it dominating our lives.
@Rhube Agitate, Educate, Organize, etc.
@pettter insufficient, alas.
@Rhube @pettter Unions and Co-ops - worker control is the only available alternative to capitalist control, right now, afaict.
@pettter first rule of organis(m/isation)s: if youโ€™re not growing youโ€™re dying

@pettter i have never used bandcamp...but now that i am dj'ing and would like to explore possibilities of making money with it...

where do i go if a place like bandcamp is no longer *the* place?

bc i dont know if using my website is the way forward since i dont have a following that is large

if you dont know, no worries, im just curious

@CaribenxMarciaX I don't know of any particular place that has sailed up as The Obvious Alternative yet, but it might be worth remembering that from what we know, the layoffs at Bandcamp has mostly impacted the editorial side of things, so it might be that they are going to remain good for artists for a while yet. Certainly I think getting their hands on the whole catalogue was a major draw for Songtradr, so it's unlikely they'll antagonize artists as a _first_ step.

@CaribenxMarciaX @pettter Maybe Qobuz? I don't really know.

If I start making music, I'll probably end up spread across SoundCloud, Spotify, YouTube, PeerTube, and Audius, as well as a website, a Gemini capsule, and a few socials.

@CaribenxMarciaX @pettter

Bandcamp is still THE PLACE. For now.

@CaribenxMarciaX @pettter there used to be marketplaces specialized for dance/house/techno and such genres. Basically, music by and for djs. I think one was (is?) Beatport. I haven't looked into any of those in ages, so I'm not able to recommend any for real. They used to be separate, because they were supposed to cater to music pros
@CaribenxMarciaX The DJs I follow here in Detroit usually make money online by posting sets on Mixcloud and streaming live on Twitch and Blast Radio.

@civicDetroitDan yea fair enough

i think it's the way forward

@CaribenxMarciaX @pettter
i follow a few folk over at mixcloud - seems popular with djs but im only a listener

@pettter i think the fundamental problem here is that capital that accept other models are eclipsed by capital that has to pay boomers pensions...

The rise of the 401k match boomers starting to fund their retirement and there is a reason it is that vast majority of capital markets today...

@pettter I really hope someone builds a non-corporate Bandcamp even if this one doesn't completely tank under the enshittification.
@pettter

That's not what killed Bandcamp. They died because Epic needed a service like theirs in their portfolio to claim a specific type of harm in a legal battle with Google over the Play store in order to bolster the rest of their case. They weren't subject to that type of harm so they had to buy a company, let Google punish them for owning it, then say "see, Google is doing this bad thing" in legal briefs.

Now that that court case is over, they have no reason to own Bandcamp anymore so they're selling it.

@o76923 @pettter

Drive by #enshitification

#EpicGames #Bandcamp

At least the @bandcampunited #union is there to hopefully get severance for people

And focus more attention on this shady shit than would otherwise happen

@pettter Always chasing that exponential.
@pettter it's not enough to make money, you have to make More money, it's all so ridiculous.

@pettter @maxeddy The same with Gumroad.

But itโ€™d have been very difficult to build these without outside capital, since they largely rely on network effects.

@pettter @alexcox

If neither survive the process, something will HAVE to take their place. The very reason they exist is to prevent killing the goose that lays the golden eggs- the only way creatives can still make a living with out being wrung dry and thrown away by some jackass in a suit.

@pettter Let me introduce you to Tom Nicholas and his video on why Patreon and financiers ruined it for everyone.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=mXyN3-gQwJw

The Rise (and Fall) of Patreon

YouTube