Gone in 61 seconds.
The keys were left near the front door.
Gone in 61 seconds.
The keys were left near the front door.
@jabgoe2089 There is literally NO motivation for the car makers to design safe systems, as the law is mostly on their side, it's the car owners who get problems with insurance.
Courts are strongly inclined to believe corporate declarations that their systems are safe.
@Cyberfuchs haha, I was thinking about speed==0.
Of course it can't know the location.😁
@gunstick
The car won't turn on gain once the thieves turn it off, though.
This means they can't just sell it to someone else. But they can still sell its parts, of course, and they can get it to a place where they have more time may have ways to crack the security systems properly (if they know how to)
@it4sec @Cyberfuchs
@it4sec crazy how Keyless Gone is still a thing today.
In this particular case, I'm pretty sure it will go to parts and the rest to the scrap yard.
@krizzzn Most of the time they will just chop it for parts.
Wtf…
@dickon @it4sec I was just thinking that I've had a keyless push-button start car for 13 years, and I'm pretty sure I knew about this attack before I bought it. I assumed at some point, when cost allowed, they'd reduce the response time-out to limit the physical distance the signal could have traveled (distance bounding). I figured meanwhile, I'd live with the risk, I'm insured.
These days, my car has a strong theft deterrent: It's a 13yo sub-compact.
@CuriousMatter @it4sec Yeah, I think the main reason we're OK is that I drive an '07 reg, fairly beaten-up Golf, and t'other half's is a '13 reg Kia Cee'd with c. 100k mi on the clock.
But it's utterly disgraceful that the manufacturers have done nothing about this in well over a decade, and we all pay in higher insurance premiums as a result.
I mean, I'm not *surprised* -- their software practices are amazing for all the wrong reasons -- but that doesn't make it less of a disgrace.
Lucky that an anti-terrorist squad didn't see that equipment.
Would give you pause that it's a suicide vest with unfortunate consiquences 🫤🤷♂️
This and CAN attacks are a perfect illustration of "blue team has to be perfect every time, red team only needs to find one mistake." Until car manufacturers become liable for the thefts, they have little incentive to find and fix the vulnerabilities they've created. Being perfect is expensive.
Pro tip: drive an older car and put in a hidden fuel pump cut off switch. (I'm guessing that's probably too complicated in the modern motorized computers called cars.)
I recently crossed paths with an acquaintance in the parking lot who pointed to her new truck and excitedly told me how cool it was that she can control the entire thing with her phone... 😱🤦♂️
I will never let auto companies stick their spyware in any car I own. It may not be possible to disable it in new vehicles, but an older ones it's often not difficult. In 2000-teens Tacomas for example the telematic transceiver is controlled by a single fuse that you can remove, or you can pull the dash off and take the unit out.