@rholland_again @charlotteclymer
“Menendez, Schumer said, is a “dedicated public servant” who “has a right to due process and a fair trial.” Yes, he does — before being convicted of a criminal offense. But Menendez doesn’t have a right to a Senate seat, not given the gravity of the accusations and the granularity of the evidence. The presumption of innocence does not mandate the willing suspension of disbelief.”
“Menendez, Schumer said, is a “dedicated public servant” who “has a right to due process and a fair trial.” Yes, he does — before being convicted of a criminal offense. But Menendez doesn’t have a right to a Senate seat, not given the gravity of the accusations and the granularity of the evidence. The presumption of innocence does not mandate the willing suspension of disbelief.” https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2023/09/23/senate-democrats-must-urge-menendez-resignation/
Um, not quite the direction Chuck is going here...
Yup. Crystal clear. What better opportunity to define proper conduct and exercise appropriate governance.
The alternative to expulsion looks a lot like the #Paxton acquittal - which is deliberate service to political tribe over the interests of the people.