Ask your Fox-watching friends if they’ve seen stories about Rep. Lauren Boebert publicly groping with her date and vaping at a public performance of Beetlejuice, all with kids present. Bet they’ll look at you blankly because Fox has simply not aired the story since it broke according to media watchers.

Fox knows Boebert is in a district she nearly lost in 2022, and that the road to the House majority might run through Colorado’s 3rd. The network isn’t “fair and balanced.” That’s a joke. Fox is warped and twisted, just like the party it services.

Pro-tip: change the content controls on home cable systems so technologically challenged folks can’t access Fox. You might just save them from being sucked in further.

@georgetakei We need the DNC to either a) have a national strategy to un-tie right wing media from the GOP base's brains, or b) put back the legal requirement of being actually fair and balanced into all news licenses.
@aka_quant_noir @georgetakei The problem is that as a cable provider, the Fairness Doctrine would never have applied to Fox. As a cable only channel they don't broadcast over public airwaves so they don't require a broadcast license.

@rthonpm @georgetakei Maybe not as it was. An upgraded Fairness Doctrine could be more robust. It could apply to more media, regulate more conduct, and treat access to the public eyeballs with an eye to electoral manipulation.

Also I've been saying for years that America took the wrong road when it licensed our broadcast frequencies. We should have demanded free air time for political candidates as part of the deal, then prohibited political ads enriching all these corporate TV news orgs.

@aka_quant_noir @georgetakei The problem you'll run into trying to expand outside of licensed airwaves is a big first amendment issue. The FCC controls broadcast airwaves, which a return of the Fairness Doctrine could at least strike a blow at right wing radio, but areas outside of its remit are going to prove very difficult.
@rthonpm @georgetakei There are many obstacles, legal and otherwise. Ensuring good faith and fair play may require a few changes to the balance in the 1st amendment jurisprudence. I don't even think anyone is going to start down this path in my lifetime, but I still like to put these ideas out there.
@georgetakei i feel like most of us shed those friends long ago
@georgetakei News is not now, nor has it ever been “fair or balanced.” News is what happened. Period. If that’s fair to you it won’t be to someone else. There is no balance. News is what happened. End of story. -30-
@airira @georgetakei But no one can publish ALL the news, and that’s part of being fair and balanced or not. There has to be an editorial process, someone has to decide what is an isn’t presented. Fox is making a deliberate editorial decision about what to publish, which is what all news organizations do. No, it’s not fair and balanced. Yes, it is biased. But all human editorial decisions are.
@lhauser @georgetakei Yes but you have it wrong. The decision to choose which stories to cover is shaded (biased is too strong a word in my opinion). But presenting the story must be factual. That is the essence of journalism. What, where, who, how and why. If you watch any broadcast network news program, the main story is the largest news item of the day. Watch more than one network on the same day. I’ll bet they all lead with the same story, told in the same way.
@airira @georgetakei Well, I wouldn’t call it wrong, but it is something I left out (I am a j-school graduate and worked as a print reporter for a few years.)
@georgetakei She could have blown her date and the entire security staff and her voters wouldn’t turn on her. The brainwashing goes that deep.
@georgetakei
"Fox-watching friends"??? That phrase is meaningless to me.

@georgetakei Hold on George - I have a quick question for you:

Fox-watching “friends”?

😎

@georgetakei #Fox long ago admitted that "fair and balanced" in their Orwellian lexicon means, "the rest of the media are liberal, so we're going full #Nazi."

@georgetakei

If you’re keeping score in the antics by members of the Lauren Boebert family these are the current standings:

Lauren missed the chance to tie her husband in exposure to minors at the theater so her husband holds a 1-0 lead there. For now.

However, Lauren holds a 1-0 lead in being groped in public and also a 1-0 lead in groping someone else in public.

And she still holds the lead 1-0 in shooting neighbors dogs who wander into your yard for no good reason.

@georgetakei
Mr. Takei,
in case you hadn't noticed, no one believes corporate media.
People believe their chosen podcasters, youtubers, or substackers.
You might snag some elderly, 'Ludd-i-ting' folks who don't own a computer.

@ecumenik @georgetakei

In public places where there are multiple TVs, one is guaranteed to be tuned to Fox News.

@georgetakei you didn’t see their coverage of this because they didn’t cover it.
@georgetakei Any suggestions for people whose parents are subscribed to their email propaganda and are on gitter/truth social?

@OShaqHennessey @georgetakei

There exists software that does some very important things that does not tolerate fiddling with clocks very well at all.

@georgetakei Lauren Boebert serve the Reaper, not us in CO – 3.
@georgetakei Why would Republicans care if a woman gave a Handjob in full view of Children when there's GAY PEOPLE HOLDING HANDS IN PUBLIC?
@georgetakei for such a conservative Christian, she’s very comfortable with sexual exploration on a first date. Apparently, the guy owns a LGBT+ drag friendly bar and is a democrat— the democrat thing is what is prohibiting the second date. I’m surprised it didn’t prevent the first. Or the make out session. Perhaps she’s more egalitarian than we’ve all thought? 🙄😂
@georgetakei honestly I'm just kind of impressed that it was with a consenting adult. The GOP Sex Scandal Bar is that fucking low.
@georgetakei That pro-tip certainly gives a whole new meaning to the phrase “parental controls”! :)
@georgetakei Oh I agree about Fox News. They aren’t remotely fair and balanced, whatever that means in this context. They choose their stories just like every other network does. The difference is their editorial style is skewed to their audience. Their obligation is to tell the truth, tell the news of the day. But they don’t tell what happened from the pov of what happened. They tell what happened as their audience wants it to be, not how it is. So as to be reassured all is ok.
@georgetakei And I have no Fox-watching friends. I’m a NYC born and raised liberal as they come, Jew. Now old and retired to Oregon. You can guess which city.
@georgetakei And believe me, I don’t need a pro tip. I was a broadcast communications major in college and understand the news biz backwards and forwards. The reason Fox became so big and MSNBC didn’t is because Murdoch cut a deal with the cable systems to get Fox News on a basic cable channel and get any liberal news organization pushed to the upper channels which had to be included in premium packages.

@georgetakei Whilst it may seem bad to weaponize #tech against #TechIlliterates at first, as #IT #Sysadmin I can assure everyone that the time and frustration saved by forcing #TechIlliterate relatives onto your tech stack is worth it!

It saves time, money, pain and frustration...

@georgetakei Every time I visit my parents, I spend a few hours unsubscribing them from hundreds of Donald Trump email lists spreading fear and begging for money. And as an added favor, I add a few hundred domains to my mom's gmail blocking rules.

But it's like putting a finger into a dike when the dike is already overflowing and bursting: You can't stop the torrents of hate when there's just so much goddamned money in the business of spreading it.

@georgetakei but noooo... it's the #LGBTQ folks exposing children to age-inappropriate sexual material. (/s) #identitypolitics
@georgetakei Republicans really don't care the horrible stuff their elected do. Psychopaths and Sociopaths have no empathy at all.