@BethanyBlack this is making me feel super confident in my doctor's assertion that my concerns about going on the pill (which I want to do, but have valid concerns about) are 'purely anecdotal' and 'the data doesn't support it'.
I always look askance at a doctor dismissing patient's 'anecdotes' about their experiences after being misdiagnosed for 7 years, but especially women's. It makes me.lose confidence in the doctor, not the anecdotes.
@BethanyBlack *looks down to the direction of their own undies*
You heard that, there? Stop that bleeding right now, this is absolutely ridiculous! I know the package said for heavy bleeding, but I *also* know it was a huge lie, just stooopppp. Please.
@Kellyshenanigans @BethanyBlack
they way they say they 'look at data' but don't believe *you*, when *your experiences* are their data, they just dismiss it.
@reneestephen @BethanyBlack Yeah. That's one of hell of a wtf moment.
How did anyone think that was a good idea?
@lispi314 my guess... squeamishness, internalized misogyny, and no incentive to focus on menstrual health issues -- marketing says stuff about capacity, sure, but what reason to do rigorous testing? why bother with that cost -- and new product development is just more of the same right?
Also, ew, blood.
@JetlagJen
I had almost the same! periods lasted 12 days (sometimes more) and were every 3.5 weeks. They were very heavy; it often felt I kept dropping organs on the floor. Plus a lot of pain. It took way too long and all doctors were male and said "This is just part of how you function." and "It's normal".
There's a lot of variation, but that's definitely extreme. A patient saying "this is a problem" should be enough for a GP to take it seriously.
@BethanyBlack This is unreal. Also of note is how so many headlines about this study completely miss the point... Ooof. When I searched for this study, most headlines said “Cups better for heavy periods” or something similar - which isn’t even a conclusion of the study other than cups held more fluid. Marie Claire Australia was the only accurate reporting on the study I found in my top search results.
Marie Claire: https://www.marieclaire.com.au/heavy-menstrual-bleeding-study
The full study is here: https://srh.bmj.com/content/early/2023/07/03/bmjsrh-2023-201895
@ErinKernohan @BethanyBlack
““I might ask a patient, ‘what’s your period like?’ and she might say, ‘Well, I soak a pad about every two hours’ – but I don’t necessarily have the time to ask what brand it is or if it’s super maxi.”
“Don’t necessarily have the time?” I just spoke the words “what brand and thickness of pad do you use” using a stopwatch and it took me literally less than two seconds to ask 😖.
Not buying it….🙄
The Marie Claire article says "It also found that menstrual cups have the greatest capacity for absorption" but the abstract says "Of the 21 individual menstrual hygiene products tested, a menstrual disc (Ziggy, Jiangsu, China) held the most blood of any product (80 mL) [...] on average, menstrual discs had the greatest capacity (61 mL) [...]. Tampons, pads (heavy/ultra), and menstrual cups held similar amounts of blood (approximately 20–50 mL)."
I'm not sure exactly how the test was conducted in the laboratory, but as Kim Rosas says here https://periodnirvana.com/menstrual-cup-or-menstrual-disc-which-to-choose , while discs "have a higher capacity than cups in theory (the crumpling of the basket likely reduces the actual capacity by some % based on each person’s anatomy.) "