HeavenlyPossumAug 3, 2023

Capitalism must always grow. It can never stop.

Capitalists must always seek to maximize differential profits—they have to collect *more* profits than their competitors.

Because you can reinvest those profits in buying up more revenue generating assets, you can expand your business and grab more market share. Or, like when Microsoft bought Nokia to grab the patents Nokia held, you can invest in blocking your competitors from expanding.

If your share of the market falls so far that you can’t make payroll or pay your creditors, you go out of business. Your capital is seized and sold off, and you become just another worker, subject to the whims and commands of capital owners.

So capital owners in competitive markets must always try to grow at a rate faster than their competitors. If they stop, if they take a break, if the global ecosystem collapses, then so does capitalism.

Show threadAlexander_Anotherskip_DavisAug 3, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum Cute, but no.
Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 3, 2023

@Alexander_Anotherskip_Davis

Wow thanks

Show threadAlexander_Anotherskip_DavisAug 3, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum Sure, i mean if you can cite research to prove your point I'll look at it but really. its a pretty poor theory that only has minimal observational support. If you can prove it I'll happily use it to smush other tweets I have seen in my thread today so win-win.
Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 3, 2023

@Alexander_Anotherskip_Davis

I’m trying and failing to figure out what it is you’re trying to accomplish here

Show threadPyperkubAug 3, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @Alexander_Anotherskip_Davis IMHO. mostly that you are conflating monopolists with capitalists and what passes for capitalism today is NOT capitalism, it is the opposite of what Adam Smith meant by free markets in capital and labor, and most your issues appear to be with what monopolists are doing to corrupt free markets and perform rent-seeking. Capitalism with good rules and referees is what's needed, but both have been corrupted by monopolists (and not for the first time).
Show threadPyperkubAug 3, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @Alexander_Anotherskip_Davis See @pluralistic 's examination of Private Equity and the Carried Interest Loophole: https://pluralistic.net/2021/04/29/writers-must-be-paid/#carried-interest
Pluralistic: 29 Apr 2021 – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Show threadPyperkubAug 3, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @Alexander_Anotherskip_Davis @pluralistic And then realize even **THAT** scam isn't enough, and needs more scams: https://pluralistic.net/2023/07/20/continuation-fraud/
Pluralistic: Private equity ghouls have a new way to steal from their investors (20 July 2023) – Pluralistic: Daily links from Cory Doctorow

Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 4, 2023

@pluralistic @[email protected] @pyperkub

Why would the existence of “scams” be antithetical to profit-seeking in competitive markets by capital owners?

Show threadPyperkubAug 4, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic See above- "Capitalism with good rules and referees is what's needed"
Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 4, 2023

@pyperkub @pluralistic

Capitalism *is* the result of rules—it is inescapably the product of state violence and cannot exist without massive state interference. This *is* capitalism acting according to the rules; there is no “good” capitalism but only degrees of violence and exploitation.

Show threadPyperkubAug 4, 2023

@HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic and socialism/communism isn't?

Hmmm... might need to come up with some way to differentiate here...

Show threadRDAug 5, 2023

@pyperkub @HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic

It's quite simple really: if it involves a state, it's not socialism or communism.

If it involves a state existing from, let's say around 1900 or so on, it's either a private capitalist state (like the US, or even "Nordic Socialist" states) or state capitalism (like USSR, China, Cuba, DPRK, Vietnam, etc).

Hope this is helpful.

Show threadPyperkubAug 7, 2023
@RD4Anarchy @HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic From Britannica - you are still conflating "monopoly/oligopoly" with "capitalism". The point being that what we have is NOT a free market based economy (Defn of Capitalism here), based on market principles, but rather an oligopoly based on monopolistic principles. That is what #enshittification is all about - Rent Seeking through Monopoly.
Show threadPKMKIIAug 7, 2023
@pyperkub @RD4Anarchy @HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic An absolute free market economy can be talked about in the abstract but can’t exist in the real world as there’s always state involvement due to the state being the one that enforces private property claims. The current oligarchy/#enshittification regime is the natural result of the capitalist class using economic pressure on the state to protect its profits.
Show threadPyperkubAug 7, 2023
@PKMKII @RD4Anarchy @HeavenlyPossum @pluralistic People enforce private property claims too. Ever seen a "No Trespassing" Sign, or one that says "Trespassers will be shot" - that ain't the State. You're still describing market capture and regulatory capture by monopolists, not capitalism, and the KEY takeaway is that part of Good Government and Communities is required to prevent Capitalism from all of the above. We're failing at that, but it's not because teh capitalism is bad.
Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 7, 2023

@RD4Anarchy @PKMKII @pluralistic @pyperkub

“No trespassing” does not signify private ownership in the sense of capital. A capitalist’s property would be worthless as capital if the capitalist excluded people from it; who else would the capitalist collect rents from at gunpoint?

Show threadPyperkubAug 7, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @RD4Anarchy @PKMKII @pluralistic So, Farmers who own their land aren't capitalists? Their land isn't their property, no matter who is enforcing their perceived "right" to their property? I am *literally* not buying this ;)
Show threadRD

@pyperkub @HeavenlyPossum @PKMKII @pluralistic

Reality can be confusing when your mind has been infected by capital's narrative, which causes people to see everything as capital.

But capital isn't really stuff, it's a social relationship of command, it's power. It's the control of other people's labor.

Aug 7, 2023 at 7:27pmWeb
Show threadHeavenlyPossumAug 7, 2023

@PKMKII @RD4Anarchy @pyperkub @pluralistic

I see this so often: people are taught that a) capitalism is just trucking and bartering and trading, it’s free enterprise and economic liberty, and also b) we live under capitalism.

And some people are clever enough to recognize that what they were taught about (a) doesn’t look anything like the lived reality of (b).

And one possible solution to this contradiction is to conclude that we were lied to about capitalism.

Unfortunately, a lot of people cling to the idea that (a) is true and hence need excuses for the contradictions of (b). It’s those darn governments interfering with their minimum wages and cronyism and prohibitions on hunting humans for sport.

What we need desperately is for people to look critically at what capitalism actually is, because the idea of “voluntary production and free trade” part is utterly incompatible with the “private ownership of means of production” part, the part that is the actual product of government violence.

Show threadalravenAug 8, 2023
@HeavenlyPossum @PKMKII @RD4Anarchy @pyperkub @pluralistic the whole starting point of critical theory/radical critique (whether that is anarchist, communist, marxist, etc, or a mix) is this! Namely that modern social relations (incl. property and production relations, but you can include various structures of domination/violence) aren't the transparent and idyllic tale of harmony (e.g. that everyone gets "what they earn", that everyone is equal in the moment of exchange/market, etc) and progress (Steven Pinker lol) that hegemonic ideology/education/discourse/common sense tells us. It needs to be deconstructed/decyphered to unearth the actual social relations (and violence, exploitation, mafia-like hostage situations in the market, institutionalised violence e.g. police/borders/etc, )...