I've stopped caring about new tech and become more political because in general we have sufficient technology to make everyone's lives better.

The problem isn't that we don't have enough or good enough technology. The problem is that the people in power aren't interested in making everyone's lives better.

Or to put it another way, we've reached the point where any new technology that's being pushed (EVs, AI, cryptocurrency, NFTs, etc) is more likely to just make some lucky self-aggrandizing moron into a billionaire than it is to make your life better in any meaningful way.

In fact, it's more likely to make your life worse.

Or to put it yet another way, the difference between ending up in a fascist cyberpunk dystopia and and ending up in a luxury space communism utopia is politics, not technology
@malcircuit The work week is a prime example for this, productivity increased by 1,200 (twelve hundred) percent since the end of WW2 and we're still expected to work 40 hour weeks so the owning classes can make profit when no one would have to work more than 15-20 hours a week for us to have the same standard of life we have today...

@malcircuit See also: Silicon Valley reinvented the bus again.

I can't be the only one who embraces "low tech" and who doesn't care about being able to switch on my heating from my phone or connect my smoke detector to a mobile app, but just wants technology to be affordable and the default (Google, Facebook) apps to be uninstallable from an Android phone.

@queerthoughts Yeah, I'm starting to lean that direction too. Like, being able to control stuff with my phone is a thing I want, but it doesn't need to be through a proprietary app that connects to some server on the internet to siphon all my data, and that will go down the instant the company goes bankrupt or decides it's not worth the money to keep it running.
@malcircuit If someone invented the replicators from Star Trek today, the government would strictly enforce copyright law on the “patterns” to “create a market”. Capitalists love false scarcity.
@zombierustpunk @malcircuit Artificial scarcity is the only way for capitalists to extort exorbitant amounts of money from some systems. No wonder they love it so much
@zombierustpunk @malcircuit This^ especially if said replicators were for necessities (food, meds etc)...
@zombierustpunk @malcircuit copyright law is *already* restricting replicators to create a market. The marginal cost of making a digital copy of something is effectively zero.
@zombierustpunk
Someone wrote an essay about how that's how we know that society changed *before* the invention of the replicator, rather than the invention of the replicator prompting the change in society. I think that's probably correct. /rel /tan
@malcircuit

@zombierustpunk @malcircuit

Heck yeah.

I've been realizing that *everything* silicon valley is doing these days is manufactured scarcity.

Subscriptions. Freaking SUBSCRIPTIONS, man.

@malcircuit I have to disagree with the notion that the technology is destined to make your life worse.

Why?

I had cancer. 33 years ago, that cancer was terminal. I actually almost died from it, but I was saved at the last minute. I truly do not know what technologies were new at the time that allowed the doctors from having to tell patients they were done for, to saving them.

I know there are AIs now that can do better than doctors at detecting tumors. No, these AIs are not ChatGPT, or Bard, or all the stuff we hear about in a daily basis.

I do understand the need to be cautious, and I don't like the wealth imbalance, but I'm not convinced that all technology is to blame.

@yourautisticlife There's a reason I used "in general", "more likely", and "less likely." It's because of exactly what you are talking about. I understand there are genuinely good technologies constantly being developed, and that we need to continue to develop them.

I literally never said "all technology" is the problem

@malcircuit Alright then. I read too much into it. 👍

@malcircuit

My feelings exactly. I care less and less about the newest and shiniest for an ever-shrinking percentage. Show me something that improves the lives of millions, by distributing the benefits of technology more broadly.

@malcircuit Could have stopped that last sentence at "the people in power".
@malcircuit The meta problem is the voters. They vote too irrationally and emotionally and far too much against their own interests :(
@breadbin @malcircuit "Democracy was a mistake" — Hayao Miyazaki
@breadbin @malcircuit There is alot of noise and missinformation out there. No wonder they are confused...
@malcircuit Spot on! We have all of the resources to make everyone’s life better! Unfortunately the resources are controlled by money hungry golems.
@malcircuit I’m still caring about technology, but I nowadays see social issues as the more critical — and I hope tech won’t become the limiting factor again when we fail at the social part for too long: https://www.draketo.de/politik/herausforderungen-technisch-sozial
Die Herausforderungen unserer Zeit sind nicht technischer, sondern sozialer Natur

Verstreute Werke von ((λ()'Dr.ArneBab))

@malcircuit absolutely and without hesitation.

The pieces of technology that make my life the best are also often the simplest, the ones least marketable and least open to being marketed by. That's incompatible with modern economics and government.

@malcircuit The tech we do have is mostly misused for capitalist purposes. And the prices of tech are often inflated for the same reasons.

There's also an education hurdle. People don't recognize the value of tech because they've only been shown the capitalist uses of tech rather than the utilitarian ones. Also, they are more easily engaged with "prettier" and simpler tools rather than powerful and empowering tools.

Like, for example, a federated social media network, say

@malcircuit

The people in control of mass production - the only reason that any of it is attainable - want to continually revise every bit of technology to keep us buying more of it. Sometimes it even offers some useful improvement as a lure. The promise of mass production was replication and cost savings, however, which has been largely up-ended. The One Percent continues to exploit and benefit by many orders of magnitude more than what trickles down.

What to do about it?

@malcircuit bread has been conquered, there is no reason insulin cannot be made to be free

@malcircuit “The future has arrived — it's just not evenly distributed yet”

The type of tech we’re still in short supply of is tech that disempowers the outsize haves and redistributes it to the havenots.

@[email protected] I think you echoed many of my thoughts. I used to be a real techie, interested in everything and getting excited about the new developments.

Now new developments just make me sad. We have no intention of creating a better world for everyone, instead the new tech always benefits the people who are already well off.

@malcircuit the way I see it, is that every time something (soft or hardware) useful is created, "new tech" is created.

Stopping to care about "new tech", for me, means accepting the current state. Never moving out of that, forever stuck in this current state of big-tech-dictates.

I refuse that and try to keep caring about new tech. For example, without "new tech" there wouldn't be mastodon, only Twitter.

@malcircuit as usual, people are the problem. I'm starting to think Agent Smith was right when he categorised humans as a virus!

@malcircuit One in ten thousand of us can make a technological breakthrough capable of supporting all the rest. The youth of today are absolutely right in recognizing this nonsense of earning a wage.

R. Buckminster Fuller

@malcircuit yep how I feel about the AI hype lately. folks not focused on solving one of our top pre-existing probs. but at best making them worse or adding new ones

I believe climate and democracy threats are the top. and deserve lion's share of talent and resources. and they likely dont need fundamentally new tech. just big political changes and social shifts. to extent software engineering for example, can help with that, great, folks should try

@malcircuit Yesss! I'm still excited about tech, because I love tinkering. But it won't improve our lives as much as changing society does, so that's where we should direct our energy!
@malcircuit The problem is that technology is largely run by an unregulated corporate oligopoly that serves its shareholders/owners and not the public.

@malcircuit

We exist in a post-scarcity world. We can feed, clothe, and house everyone on the planet, & have a thriving economy with plenty for everyone. The twelve people who run the world, the very richest people on the face of the planet, see that fact as a threat to their ability to own everything & everyone. To step out of this distopian nightmare of capitalistic slavery and into a brighter world, we need to throw off the shackles of traditional economics. Embrace the Zero Value Economy.

@malcircuit If we worked to make people's lives better, tech would also move in that direction.

Case and point: the coronavirus vaccine. For a brief moment in time, making people's lives better was also in the best interest of the profit motive and the world's fastest developed vaccines (plural!) We're developed.

Imagine if that were put into practice for housing, or mental health.

Imagine if the tracking tech we have were used to get people mental health attention, instead of to push products.

Tech isn't the problem, it's capitalism.

@malcircuit THIS. Most new tech, at least that I see advertised & celebrated, is never about making everyone's lives better, it's always about making money
@malcircuit the problem is also that a lot of what we understand as "technology" is actually just a new way for making working conditions more precarious and unrealiable as well
@malcircuit exactly.
but what gives me hope every time again is: we are the many.
we *just* have to overcone the divisions imposed on us by politics of "divide and conquer" ...