This took me a while to figure out and I'm still not sure how to put it into words, but it's been on my mind a lot the last few years:

"Community" isn't a label you adopt or a party you show up to. It's what you bring to the table.

If you want to feel connected when you walk into the bar, you have to introduce yourself to people and make conversation. If you want to play, you have to approach and ask for what you want. If you want a certain kind of event, you gotta organize, donate, volunteer.

I think it's easy to imagine "the community" as this Big Powerful Organized Thing that owes us understanding and support. Why did the contest not provide ASL interpretation? Why didn't someone welcome me on my first night at the bar and introduce me to everyone? How could Springfield Leather provide the wrong kind of bootblack stand? This community is trash!

These are all great things. We *should* have terps! It's *nice* when someone takes a newcomer under their wing personally.

What you don't necessarily see is that the only local pup who could volunteer to interpret got COVID, and there wasn't money or time to hire a professional. That the organizers of the bar night can't physically keep track of everyone who walks in, or control entry to a bar open to the public. That the committee had a volunteer who put hundreds of dollars and weeks of time into building a bootblack stand, but due to work and illness it wasn't ready in time; the committee improvised.

Broadly speaking, our classes and events run on shoestring budgets. Almost everyone involved is an unpaid, overworked volunteer desperately trying to keep an ungainly plane in the air. Our boards are tiny and piece together events in their free time through a network of personal favors and the goodwill of sponsors. All of this runs on people just like you.

You gotta show up. Buy raffle tickets. Lend your sparkling wit. Volunteer in whatever capacity you can. Sit on committee. That's community.

@aphyr I feel very lucky that the SLSC Education Committee has enough folks that we can hold one to three classes a month. It took a lot of time and work to get there. And still, our board and other committees are understaffed. When I ask folks with opinions and good ideas if they want to be involved, they don't have time. Or, they served on some other org's board and say they can't handle the "drama" or rage-quit because no one was doing the work but them
@yearofthepig as @reddywhp noted... Burnout is a hell of a thing. I'm really glad you've built that kind of critical mass!

@aphyr @reddywhp I've been learning to set boundaries and say no, and to eat my feelings of disappointment in myself and the community over the gap between the vibrance that is possible and the pared down reality of what's practical.

Anyway, anyone reading who isn't volunteering, even one person additional on a committee or board makes a huge difference in what an org can do for the community. I hope you'll consider giving your time to make the community you want to see!

@aphyr That leads to is a community where the same people run orgs/events all the time. That means 1, nothing changes for the better, and instead burnout/repetition cause a slow decline; 2, leadership doesn't diversify, remains largely older, male and/or white; 3, most community events are ones that focus on making money for venues/producers; 4, carpetbaggers (people who aren't kinky or in the community) swoop in to produce those events, which are largely about selling alcohol to gay men.

@aphyr And we end up with a kink "community" that is largely centered around "vanilla latte" harness parties and contest culture that exists to fund venues, line producer pockets, and promote alcohol sales, while most interaction to find radical sex happens online. Or, queer kinksters have to enter pan spaces that are mostly straight and white, and often don't feel like home even if they attempt to be welcoming.

I would guess this is less of a problem in Chicago and SF, but elsewhere...

@yearofthepig @aphyr here in Pittsburgh, the link “community” is closeted and largely non-existent. There ARE kinksters here, but it’s very cliquey and closed off :-(
@thicmuscle @aphyr There are probably reasons for the state of your local queer kink community that could be solved, or if not a new community built, if enough people got together and tried. Inertia is the most powerful force, but it's not impossible.

@yearofthepig @aphyr Definitely still a problem in SF. There's a reason WickedGrounds no longer has a physical presence, there's only one main public dungeon, ... Fortunately the community has/builds a lot of other spaces esp. recently; bars and dungeons aren't the sole, but those additional spaces also make a lot more barriers to entry. Be so nice to have a city which is a kinky play ground.

I'm definitely hopeful that with lowering commercial real estate more will become viable

@yearofthepig @aphyr Tho this is more from protest groups: a common dynamic is also that there's a pressure for performance (events, tickets, high profile speeches) and/or the defacto org boss is high octane -> educational / reachout/ chill events are deprioritised -> new ppl inflow drops -> rinse and repeat till burnout :(

And again, newcomers don't necessarily get that such spaces (even with some funding or merch) simply can't exist as for-profits. Reproductive work still sucks in that way, yay.

@chmps @aphyr Right!

At SLSC, we focus on education, service, play, and broadcasting diverse voices in queer kink. Everyone at the table (board, committee members, educators, venue partners) is part of deciding what success is and looks like. As a result, we together decided to deprioritize events that don't fill a gap and don't feel pressure to put all our effort in "going big."

@yearofthepig @aphyr that's really cool. Also you two are for doing this.
@yearofthepig @aphyr Related to that is the danger of using this a shield from criticism. Because events *should* be widely accessible. And some ppl will just dunk, while others may actually just want to vent about getting excluded yet again and then be willing to actually help (since they may in fact know how the problems that pissed them off can be addressed, that's why they are angry in the first place). And ultimately, it's a fantasy to expect systemic oppression to just crumble away. Not having to really care about ASL/mobility needs is everything running smoothly. A (legit) conflict on inclusion is actually preferable over "Yeee, we're so woke, how dare u bring it up, I am one of the good ones, can't you seeee?" Tis hard, but nothing ventured, nothing gained.

@chmps @yearofthepig Agreed. And to add on: we have to be honest about the fact that universal accessibility is often in conflict with constraints of budget and volunteer expertise & time (or, implicitly, access for people with less money).

I'm really happy that the events CinL puts on (and leather events in general!) have widespread ASL interpretation and partial mobility accessibility. Hell yeah! But I also recognize that takes a specific combination of organizers, volunteers, space, funds.

@aphyr @chmps @yearofthepig I'm struggling with this for MIR right now. We really want closed captions for the livestream but I'm at the limits of my expertise. The solution we originally planned didn't work out and I had to spend a bunch of time kludging something together that looked like crap. And then the bill came in from the interpreters way over budget. I'm still not sure what we're going to do this year.
@johnnygear @aphyr @chmps Is there any way to get an accessibility sponsor? Recalling "closed captioning sponsored by..." back when broadcast TV was more of a thing. A gofundme or similar? Live captioning sounds like an expensive thing to deliver.
@yearofthepig We have sponsors for the stream itself but someone else set up the deal for the captioners so I just assumed it was taken care of. The real pain is the technical side and there doesn't seem to be any off the shelf solutions that are okay with adult content

@chmps @yearofthepig @aphyr I probably interpret this article more widely than its author intended, but a lot of the systems / reinforcements it talks about for _how_ and _why_ it's hard to make changes in kink orgs. I've been trying to make 1) feedback encouraged, 2) help changing appreciated 3) Bring what you'd like to see; there's a lot of space, and more fun is a good thing.

To try and counteract some of them

https://fetlife.com/users/4832168/posts/9599694

Login | FetLife