I’m just curious, which category would you put yourself under?
(Please boost for greater reach.)
I’m just curious, which category would you put yourself under?
(Please boost for greater reach.)
@whitemice @skribe @LoganFive I've wondered on and off for years if I was neuro-divergent, but online quizzes were always inconclusive. So I never claimed it. And I've been a programmer for decades.
I get the feeling that self-diagnosed people who are actually ND can be hesitant to claim it. It usually didn't bring a lot of benefit to do so. Kind of still doesn't.
About 18 months ago I realized about half of the ADHD memes I saw I would react with "Hey! I'm like that! Oh..." So I went to my GP asking for an ADHD evaluation. The psychologist I saw was sure within half an hour. The psychiatrist I saw was sure within an hour. It's mild, but definite.
I now have tools to look at ND behaviour. I'm pretty sure I'm the only one in my team who is ND.

@LoganFive I filled in "I don't know.".
Especially because some neurodivergent people around me say "You definitely are neurodivergent" and some neurotypical people around me say "You are definitely neurotyptical".
Something, something, mixed signals 😂
interesting results, ie people who put themselves into neurotypical category are a very small group. really not typical.
i know mastodon is a niche thing atm, many minorities and atypical folks here, i know, and it may skew this hugely - but i do wonder whether more people actually fall for neurotypical category.
...unless this is similar to eg high blood pressure - most people who live modern lifestyle and esp over a certain age don't have natural level of bp but exceed it.
We all believe we're unique and special.
It's called the Forer Effect (aka the Barnum Effect) and it's why things like "cold readings" and other fake mystical bullshit works so well.
There's an awesome and easy to do group experiment that proves it.
Barnum Effect, in psychology, the phenomenon that occurs when individuals believe that personality descriptions apply specifically to them (more so than to other people), despite the fact that the description is actually filled with information that applies to everyone. The effect means that people
@enby_of_the_apocalypse @LoganFive Well yeah, that's probably true. It is for me. I've been "medication supported" for a couple of decades and I'm not that unusual.
Still, I think without distinction, most people don't consider themselves 'typical'. The DSM-5 is pretty specific on most of its symptom lists, that while many people match many descriptions, each should only be considered if it is significant enough to impact the way they live. Otherwise, we'd all be self diagnosed.
I thought I was neurotyp until an exchange with Slice last night