Did you know that "pushing your #code to #GitHub" is not how to #OpenSource a project?
It is about adding a Free #License, and you can push anywhere you want, including #Codeberg, for example :)
Did you know that "pushing your #code to #GitHub" is not how to #OpenSource a project?
It is about adding a Free #License, and you can push anywhere you want, including #Codeberg, for example :)
@Codeberg I've migrated my important projects to codeberg, and will do the rest when I have time. I have no desire to interact with github anymore, and so far codeberg has been everything I've needed so far.
The only issue I have had is some performance problems with the CI, but I don't think the CI is production quality yet.
@AAMfP @loke @fsfe @Codeberg
Codeberg is a fine GitHub replacement but it could be so much more. I still use #SourceForge for my bigger projects as it provides:
- email lists
- web hosting with rsync & ssh access
- multiple VCS options
Git is great, but monoculture is not. I'd really like to see choices on the front end as well (e.g. cgit for browsing repositories).
@indigo
Repository federation doesn't seem very interesting as Git is already distributed.
Some project services could be on different servers, but it's much easier to co-locate them and access them via a single account.
I'd like to see forges move to a more traditional model of hosting services in an À la carte fashion. Each project should be able to choose their own VCS, forum software, issue tracker, etc.