CodebergDid you know that "pushing your #code to #GitHub" is not how to #OpenSource a project?
It is about adding a Free #License, and you can push anywhere you want, including #Codeberg, for example :)
Elias Mårtenson@Codeberg I've migrated my important projects to codeberg, and will do the rest when I have time. I have no desire to interact with github anymore, and so far codeberg has been everything I've needed so far.
The only issue I have had is some performance problems with the CI, but I don't think the CI is production quality yet.
Marco Bresciani
Karl R@AAMfP @loke @fsfe @Codeberg
Codeberg is a fine GitHub replacement but it could be so much more. I still use #SourceForge for my bigger projects as it provides:
- email lists
- web hosting with rsync & ssh access
- multiple VCS options
Git is great, but monoculture is not. I'd really like to see choices on the front end as well (e.g. cgit for browsing repositories).
@wickedsmoke @AAMfP @fsfe @Codeberg I would certainly love to be able to use Mercurial instead of git, but at the same time I can understand why that isn't high on Codeberg's priority list.
@loke
Savannah has a _very_ old and peculiar interface, let alone the registration policy (hand-checked!), but it actually offers many features and I like it.
But it's probably (surely) unbearable for modern (younger) developers
@wickedsmoke. @fsfe @Codeberg
Savannah has a _very_ old and peculiar interface, let alone the registration policy (hand-checked!), but it actually offers many features and I like it.
But it's probably (surely) unbearable for modern (younger) developers
@wickedsmoke. @fsfe @Codeberg