Alex Colpitts
elle mundywho called it object oriented programming and not class struggle
if you’re thinking of explaining to me why my joke is wrong, here’s a little pro tip for you: don’t
GrendelI'm absolutely sending this to the supervisor that wrote a python app using multiple inheritance with cyclical references.
That was a very educational puzzle for our intern to sort out...
Lightning Bjornsson* 
dok
Chris White finds this vexing
John Lusk*snerk*
pacanukeha❌ (seasonally appropriate remix)@exchgr this is :chef's kiss:
Pete Zicato@exchgr What an opportunity missed. I’ve been programming OO languages for decades and never thought of this.
Abhijit 
@exchgr who are you.. so wise in the ways of science?
arclight@exchgr We were warned about inheritance, especially multiple inheritance...
Daniel has moved@tastapod @exchgr I have personal experience in this area - I can tell you more about the sludge removal process than you'd ever want to know: https://www.hanford.gov/page.cfm/STP
As with software, it takes time and analysis and many incremental steps, mockups and testing. It's a tractable problem but it isn't going to happen overnight.
(PS: I converted a 100+ page MathCAD worksheet into a Jupyter notebook, then into standalone Python code to generate input for our safety analysis software. The layering of multicomponent sludge as it settles out is pretty neat and was key to the safety analysis of the whole sludge removal, transport, and storage process. Cool project, decent people, good outcome.)
DCoder 🇱🇹❤🇺🇦
Andrew Feeney
NK30 
Chris Bohn
Dan Mayer
Jesus Michał "Le Sigh" 🏔 (he)@exchgr, they actually meant to say "oops" but had an off-by-one error.
Iron Archer@exchgr
That'd fit better with what I produce.
That'd fit better with what I produce.
BenRiceM
Peter RelphIn class struggle, classes don't inherit anything from other classes.
They may extort things, but not inherit.
Something something market efficiency blah blah Reagan hand waving trickle down. Also my head lives in my ass.
Kevin Marks@peterrelph2 @exchgr Do you know of the Duke of Westminster?
@kevinmarks @exchgr Previously not, ta.
Lyner@exchgr because not everyone uses Java or C++
@exchgr also, https://eev.ee/blog/2013/03/03/the-controller-pattern-is-awful-and-other-oo-heresy/ (not my blog, but a good read)
max22-
Lizzy Fleckenstein@exchgr meanwhile functional programming being classless, stateless and moneyless
(moneyless because there are no Haskell jobs ;-;)
Tor Iver Wilhelmsen@exchgr because the struggle came later when someone started implementing multiple inheritance of implementation.
Dave Griffiths
Tarcio@exchgr FactoryFactoryFactorySingletonManager
Wolfgang Marcos@exchgr
same fool who called it stress free packaging instead of instant blood pressure raising packaging
same fool who called it stress free packaging instead of instant blood pressure raising packaging
Christopher Mims
kaPOTTke@exchgr class.struggle()
Alex Celeste, Princess Consort of BurnoutNO CLASS (λ) NO STATE
Partially Stochastic@exchgr I prefer declarative programming, where I just declare that my software is working, and leave it at that
Kill cars for climate!@exchgr Who called it "functional programming" and not "Smash the state"?
@mastodon.world man i just don't know who to follow in here.
Alan Wright 🇬🇧 🇮🇲@exchgr
I see what you did there 😂😂
I see what you did there 😂😂
mastodonroufakis@exchgr what is this im😭😭😭
pas un réseau social
Bill Ricker
Marc@exchgr because object oriented programming is about sending a message ;)
Demian@exchgr some classes are deliberately overloaded
Resuna@exchgr ObPedant: not all OO languages have classes
bignoseChoose your side: private, protected, or public
dxmachina
👻 Feufochmar@exchgr there exists class-less object-oriented programming.
Akshay | అక్షయ్@exchgr Taxing Inheritance.
Coo-Ops@exchgr lefties 🤝 programmers.
Niels Abildgaard@exchgr Nothing to lose but our type system
natriumchloride@exchgr its abbreviation is 'oop' though so there's that at least xd
Officially Tara 🕷️ 
🌹@exchgr capitalists
Paolo Redaelli@exchgr
Because OOP was never centered on classes but on messaging between objects. Classes is a typing taxonomy
Because OOP was never centered on classes but on messaging between objects. Classes is a typing taxonomy
Ian@exchgr not sure but my code is often dysfunctional