@andybaio I too carried the torch for Reader for many years, but seem to have acquired some perspective 10 years later.
Now I'm glad when I see organizations exhibit incompetence. A world of competent organizations that are able to hold on to our attentions in the long term -- such a world is too horrible to contemplate. Probably something like Google Search or Reddit, monetization run rampant.
I'm no longer angry Google killed Reader. I'm angry I let it get into my muscle memory.
@akkartik @andybaio yeah. what i'm angry about isn't reader's demise _per se_, it's the structural role reader played in consolidating so much of the feed ecosystem that the end of a single product could massively damage it.
a lesson we never, collectively, seem to learn despite endless opportunities.
@andybaio Related:
Atom Feed Format Was Born 20 Years Ago
https://www.rssboard.org/news/213/atom-feed-format-born-20-years-ago
@andybaio, #GoogleReader was awesome. It did what one needed it for.
(Could we say that given the low info density, flat design superficiality of everything that came later, Reader’s shutdown marked the death of “Web 2.0”?)
I was at Google at the time and recall my own and other Googlers’ disappointment
Perhaps the biggest disappointment though is how everyone seems to have understood the death of Reader as the death of feeds
Feeds aren’t dead, but we lost a decade bringing them to people
@andybaio Google actually killed Reader Social first. The Reader product limped on for 1-2 years.
I use Feedbin now. Great product.
Yup, don’t be evil died when they chose to chase after FB. The idiots did not realise they had an orthogonal social network in Reader that was much more resilient as finding people to talk world events with in a safe space was a need that was always going to exist. Now some of us are doing it in lemmy and mastadon and kbin.