I'm gonna try to clear up a few things

Meta is not gonna buy Mastodon or any server, this is based on absolutely nothing and untrue.

Yes, some of us indeed got contacted by Meta/Insta because they are working on a new social platform (this was in the news) and they are looking into joining the Fediverse (Mark Zuckerberg also told this in the recent podcast)

SO.

This contact was about a "heads-up" for a potential big platform to join the network and not for a "take over".

[1/2]

[2/2]

People have asked me to 'preblock' this project but I am not gonna.

Meta is not Gab so we give them a chance and can always block them later with 2 simple button clicks..

We would never ever sell out on you but rather invest time to make this all go smooth without everything come crashing down

I hope this clears up some mis-understandings

@stux I just don't like how "Meta is not Gab" sounds a little too much like "this dragon is LESS BAD" to me. I don't want any dragons in my home.

@The_Augusto Well yeah it is

We know Meta

But we dont know their new platform so

@stux @The_Augusto we know they have a horrid track record on privacy, they have a horrid track record on moderation, and they have a horrid track record on “embracing” open protocols to kill them off. Each of this alone would be sufficient to preemptively defederate. All of them together even more so. Exactly what do you expect to be different this time?

@oblomov @stux @The_Augusto

Maybe there is already an exchange of $$$ happening behind the scenes.

@oblomov @stux @The_Augusto if I didn't know any better... a lot of these people talk like they've been literally bribed.
@oblomov @stux @The_Augusto Yes. But. Which of those those bad things is prevented by defederating?

@BenAveling @stux @The_Augusto

At lest the last 2 out of 3, and 1st is made not any easier.

But again the question that the “wait and see” camp never replies to is: what information do you have to expect that it won't be a shitshow, given the company's track record?

@stux @The_Augusto @oblomov how does blocking them improve their migration?
How does it prevent them adding features?
@BenAveling @stux @The_Augusto deflection again! The question is very simple yet receives no answer: what information do you have that this time will be different than their abysmal track record on privacy, moderation, and open protocol busting, to justify a “wait and see” approach?
@oblomov @stux @The_Augusto If you want to block them, by all means, block them. Just don't kid yourself that it achieves any of the things you want it to achieve.
@BenAveling @stux @The_Augusto you still haven't answered the question
@[email protected] @stux @The_Augusto I've answered the question to my own complete satisfaction. If the answer doesn't satisfy you, you know where the block button is.
@stux @The_Augusto
This sounds willfully obtuse
@stux
And *BECAUSE* we already *KNOW* Meta we don't want their grubby greedy hands near us, do not become a facilitator.
@The_Augusto
@stux @The_Augusto this is the most naive thing I have heard since pre 2016.
@stux @The_Augusto You know they want to kill us off, but because you don't know how yet you're inviting them in?
@sentientmortal @stux @The_Augusto They don't need an invite. The fediverse is open source.

@stux @The_Augusto "We know Dan is a repeated abuser, however Dan is now wearing a new leather jacket, so maybe he doesn't abuse people anymore, we should wait and see"

Great logic, 10/10,

@The_Augusto @stux meta is not gab

meta is not as bad as gab

meta is much, much worse than gab

@The_Augusto

Thankfully you have the functionality at your fingertips to slam the door shut on those dragons any time you want. So does everyone else, but that is *their* choice to make.

As you can probably guess I'm strongly against admins defederating other instances wholesale and taking the freedom/choice away from their users. Unless it's to counter something that's illegal or promotes hate or prejudice.

@stux

@stux but we still don't know who they met and what was discussed. NDA was a bad idea to begin with.

There are about 3 million active users of the fediverse and billion dollar company targeted, what five, six, ten individuals?

@fedi what's NDA
@ana @fedi non disclosure agreement basically companies have you sign it to stop you talkinh about trade secrets or anything else, allows prosecution if you break it

@ana @fedi

"Non Disclosure Agreement." It's a contract that (mostly corporations & rich people) have you sign so you can't disclose the contents of any conversation they might have with you about a given topic.

#NDAs are incredibly helpful when developing a new product and trying to beat the competition to market, but are also incredibly helpful when trying to silence critical voices or trying to be sneaky about something.

In case anyone drops in two years later and is also wondering, just like @ana was:

An NDA is a Non-Disclosure Agreement, a legal tool that companies use for protecting their trade secrets when having talks with external parties about things that are close to company strategy.

Or, said from a different perspective, it's one of the ways companies silence people when they want to get away with evil.

@fedi

@stux I think this is the right stance. Thank you.
@stux Thanks. Appreciate seeing cooler heads joining the discussion.

@stux For once, I’d like there would be NO bullying campaign against instances admins who don’t follow the “blocking orders” when it does not concern blatantly illegal contents. Freedom is also freedom of choice, and users still can block other users or instances themselves, if they don’t want to interact with some of them.

Good luck.

@TritTriton

Absolutely, and that also means we should be open and supportive of people moving away from instances where admin make poor decisions! Remember; migrating accounts on mastodon is easy and possible (unlike Facebook).

And nobody would want to paint people with a legitimate concern or complaint as being abusive, right? That's a gross right wing tactic to squash criticism, especially when as mastodon's excellent moderation tools were an example why Facebook won't be a problem 😉

@sammy Of course. Nobody has to feel forced to do or endure thing they don’t want.
@stux I agree with your decision. In fact, Meta's Threads will be much more vulnerable to lose users to other instances once they learn how the #fediverse works. Why would I choose to be on a comercial plataform like Meta's, where I am exposed to ads all the time, if I can migrate to an instance which is ad-free?
@stux another option is to block Meta only when they have destroyed Twitter. A kind of "Mission Accomplished" reward 😉
@serklarvel @stux
How would they know?
How would the average user, scrolling on a Meta-Fedi feed, seeing a flow of the usual FB screeds, IG pics, algorithmically tweaked correct amount of ads, and whatever post from the broader Fediverse that goes viral enough to squeak through the filter, be able to tell that things operate differently here?
@drimplausible @stux we on the fediverse can follow people on Thread and tell them there is life outside Meta-Matrix. There will be TT related to fediverse. If Meta blocks such information, then they are playing tricks and should be defederated. Right now, I see Thread much more vulnerable to the fediverse, unless they a fantastic app, superior to Mastodon and others. Anyway, there is no need to rush and pre-block Meta now.

@serklarvel @drimplausible @stux

The thing that worries me ahead of time is the taking over of successful social media to make it inherently a massive disinformation platform.

Facebook was made to be a massive disinformation platform.

Tracking other instances doesn't worry me per se. But these disinfo platforms will absolutely not stop being that, and if factual responses to "vaccines kill people" and "vinegar kills cancer" are zapped Lemmy-styl;e that is also a reason they should be cut.

@drimplausible @serklarvel @stux

In fact, when even most Mastodon users aren't even aware of the existence of other Fediverse platforms, you can bet that Meta will make sure their users will be kept in obscurity as far and wide as possible.

@serklarvel @stux This would assume that they're offering no value other than a different mastodon client. I doubt that's the case.
@serklarvel @stux I wouldn't bet on them allowing easy account migration across the fediverse. Meta can just choose to not offer the "move" activity to their users, effectively locking them in if they don't want to lose followers.
@andre @serklarvel @stux yeah, they can just make it impossible to switch to another instance.
@serklarvel @stux there's actually very little chance that a significant number of accounts will jump ship from Threads to the rest of the Fediverse. Keep in mind Meta controls their side of the connection and will make sure that (1) leaving will be hard (you can be your life they will NOT‌ support one-click migration TO Mastodon, although they'll probably support it in reverse
(2) what they let through of the Fediverse will not be meanignful enough to even justify jumping over.

@stux "Meta is not gab" yeah it only allows Nazis to propagate easily without fear of removal or ban, and allows data harvesting companies to collect so much that it has to investigated by Congress.

Sure it's not ran by Nazis but it allows without question them free admission and publication.

Meta is not our friend.

@queue @stux Facebook only facilitated the Rohyinga massacres in Myammar, 1/6 Capitol attack and propaganda that is killing trans people, but nothing to be concerned about here, folks.

@jamiestl
@queue Yep. I did a poll about this a while ago and over 90% of the responses saw Meta/FB similar to Gab (although admiittedly I phrased as a bit of a leading question). Several different people said to me "At first I thought you were exaggerating about Meta but geez they really did do all those things!" #DefederateMeta

https://indieweb.social/@jdp23/110449505980762006

Jon (@[email protected])

A #FediblockMeta poll on #defederation Which (if either) of these two hypothetical instances would you want your instance to block? - G is a hub for right-wing coup planning; hosts accounts that spew hate and disinformation; and is run by white supremacists - M is a hub for right-wing coup planning; sells ads that amplify hate and disinformation; contributes to genocides; and has a long track record of privacy abuses, discrimination, and law-breaking @[email protected] [ ] Bock G (but not M) [ ] Block M (but not G) [ ] Block both [ ] Don't block either

Indieweb.Social

@queue @stux #NSAbook is our enemy, because they not only WILL but ALREADY DO SNITCH ON USERS!

And not only in regards to #PRISM, but literally ratting out #LGBTQIA in #MENA nations and people seeking #Abortions in the #USA and #Poland...
https://mstdn.social/@kkarhan/110567700762933288

Kevin Karhan :verified: (@[email protected])

Content warning: meta, literal meta

Mastodon 🐘
@kkarhan You probably wanna export your account out of your instance. I suggest anything on the list by @vantablack

@queue @vantablack

I just wounder what the blocklist may look like since I do follow some instances that may be partially defederated by some, but not all...

https://github.com/greyhat-academy/lists.d/blob/main/activitypub.domains.block.list.tsv

lists.d/activitypub.domains.block.list.tsv at main · greyhat-academy/lists.d

List of useful things. Contribute to greyhat-academy/lists.d development by creating an account on GitHub.

GitHub
@kkarhan @queue @vantablack and egregiously, if you complain about Nazi content, nothing will be done. And if you punch back at any Nazis harassing you, you get put in Metajail with nothing happening to the harassers.

@cadenza @queue @vantablack yeah.

To make it extra insulting,  &  only #geoblock said contents but don't take them offline - regardless if tuese are literally illegal in several juristictions AND are universally bad.

@stux I appreciate the update. I hope that your gut instincts are right.

Me? I don’t think Meta will ever be as evil as Gab.

I fear they will pull a bait and switch on us. Try to be magnanimous . Openness. No advertising. Easy move to another server.

Then once they are massively the most dominant player - they reverse all of that and lock down the server from cross posting, start bombarding with ads, make it harder to leave.

I hope I am wrong.

@stux But I also think overall we will be better off with a player that big in the space. The money and attention they bring outweigh the negatives.