Yesterday, users of mstdn.social instance lost their connections to artists at mastodon.art instance ( src: https://framapiaf.org/@Curator@mastodon.art/110570978375947500 ). I hope giving visibility to this issue will help them to restore the broken bridges.
Mastodon•ART 🎨 Curator (@[email protected])

We're no longer blocked by mstdn.social, but I don't know if that's subject to change. Unfortunately, when an instance suspends another instance, all follow/follower relationships are immediately broken and aren't recovered by un-suspending, so you will have to find and re-follow your connections there.

Mastodon.ART
not sure that bridge is up to spec
@davidrevoy
@p Hehe, it's a sketch from 2019 and it's fun because I made my first real work of masonry last week, and if I had to redraw it, I would do it differently. Mortar paste can't be that sticky and solid. I was shocked to see how it was more like mud with sand in it, gluing nothing, and requiring casing for any volumes. So, I totally agree with your observations. 😺
@davidrevoy That is SUCH a cute picture!!! It should be a murial!
@davidrevoy Really nice artwork - I love it :)

@davidrevoy pardon my ignorance, is "mstdn.social" the same as "mastodon.social" or a different instance?

Is there any kind of documentation on how to keep track of who I'm following so that I can restore broken follows the next time mastodon.social breaks the fediverse or is otherwise excommunicated by other instances?

@davidrevoy the short dumb answer is Preferences > Import/Export > Export, which will produce a dump of everything. Or just collect the CSV for "follows".

Is there any mechanism to be notified that one of my "follows" is no longer accessible? Do I just have to re-follow everyone every other week?

@manicdee They are different, but I also mixed up the two instances at first so I think many will have the same feeling. Their naming really overlaps too much; it just sounds like one is the URL shortening of the second... I could disambiguate the two by their number of active users mainly:

- https://mstdn.social/explore (31K active users)

- https://mastodon.social/explore (220K active users)

Mastodon 🐘

A general-purpose Mastodon server with a 500 character limit. All languages are welcome.

Mastodon hosted on mstdn.social
@davidrevoy thank you for the clarification. Now I can try to understand my options for the rest of my questions at a more relaxing pace :D Although I'm sure it's only a matter of time before mastodon.social gets in trouble for what the people that use it are saying or doing.

@manicdee @davidrevoy

These are completely different instances hosted by different owners.

You can export your followers via settings in Mastodon web application. #MastodonSocial's impact on the Fediverse is overstated - as long as there is a relay server that your instance can depend on, mastodon.social is but one of the noisy figures that can be safely removed. Not without caveats, but, if people you follow don't sit there, it's fine.

@davidrevoy I so hope we all will stay connected.🥰🙏Have an awesome day..
@davidrevoy it was resolved at 3pm BST yesterday right? As far as I know, curator and one other account is blocked, that's it.
@experiencersinternational @davidrevoy the follows between the two servers don't come back when an admin unblocks another server. They stay gone unless people manually refollow
@eniko @experiencersinternational @davidrevoy Yep, lost 400 connections when Mastodon.nz suspended Mastodon.social last month.
@experiencersinternational @davidrevoy yes but the unblock doesnt fix all the users who followed each other between the two instances. Imagine suddenly no longer following your friends from another server overnight. That happened to 20000 users. The damage is done.
@foervraengd @davidrevoy yeah I know, it's an unfortunate situation
@davidrevoy the art really lacks those men... maybe add some Tu-95 bummer with propellers, that launched propeller bombs (made in Aliexpress) at those ladies
@davidrevoy It was a matter of time. This is my one problem with mastodon. They can't take over the platform but that doesn't mean us users have the power. It's the instance admins instead of a big company...
@davidrevoy I'm on mstdn.social and my follow list is still full of people from mastodon.art. Their profiles wouldn't display during the brief period the server was blocked, but there wasn't a permanent severed connection that I can see.
@TonyaCanning This was my experience, too. I'm still getting posts and boosts from at least a few mastodon.art folks that I followed before the suspension, although it doesn't look like they are following me any longer...

@htdrake @TonyaCanning
The account @[email protected] is blocked here on https://masto.ai (which has the same admin as mstdn.social, Stux)

I suspect it is also blocked on your instance?

It has as far as I remember 60,000? followers.

It is one of the best and most influential accounts on the fediverse, imo.

The defederation was a unilateral decision by Stux and has resulted in numerous lost connections.

Mastodon

A general Mastodon server for all languages.

Mastodon hosted on masto.ai

@fedi @TonyaCanning I wondered if the suspension was so short-lived that perhaps not all the follow connections in whatever database tracks them were removed on our instances' sides.

Aside from this one event, I've found Stux to be a very reasonable admin. He's built up a lot of trust in my "trust bank" and has earned the right to learn from this mistake and do better in future.

@htdrake

Just to clarify I'm sure the block on the Curator account after mastodon.art was unblocked is deliberate.

Stux has put a lot of work into his instances and deserves thanks for that definitely. I accept that admins will make mistakes.

I don't know if you are aware that he has said that his instances will federate with a Facebook instance that is believed to be joining mastodon(fediverse) in the next few weeks - this is related to the chaos yesterday.

@htdrake @fedi
I've felt the same way. Even with the Meta thing. I think Facebook are appalling, but I can understand feeling it's more in line with consistent moderation to not pre-emptively block ab instance for things you assume they'll do.
@davidrevoy This does rather overlook the slight detail that mastodon.art have themselves suspended multiple popular instances for entirely arbitrary and bizarre reasons.
mastodon.art/about
@davidrevoy like when the mechanical team meet up with the software team..
@davidrevoy for me the particulars of this incident aren't the most important thing. My takeaway is that no instance that wants to be taken seriously should be able to take action like this based on just one person's feelings. Collective decision making helps us be better than we would be alone.
@davidrevoy to be honest, I think it is not ok to fully blocked an instance, since this is anti-fediverse. @Mastodon should remove “block a server” function, as this gives the admin the superpower over what the users on their server can see and interact. Simply silence a server from appearing in one server’s public timeline should be the ultimate solution. Every user/ resident in one server should have the freedom to choose what they can see.

@Henry there are instances that really everybody wants to block at a server level, because they aren't sending any kind of useful message but just plain, uncontroversially, spam.

Our instance only has less than 10 active users and no open registration, so we can afford do be very permissive, and we still have a blocklist that is mostly filled with those.

Then there are instances that have been created with the explicit intent to host people accounts dedicated to harass other people: one may prefer a place where these are blocked in advance or one where blocks only happen after the fact, but while under active attack you don't really want every user on a server to suffer from them either.

And then there is simply the fact that some user will want to manage their own block list, but others are much more happy knowing that an admin *they trust* has done most of the work.

The point is that the fediverse gives you the choice to be on a server where you trust the admin and like their policies, removing instance blocks from everybody (or enforcing them for everybody, if it was technically possible) would make it worse, not better.

@davidrevoy That is a lovely piece of art!

(Aah, can’t keep it in. Viking helmets didn’t have horns:) That looks like a Wagner opera:) But I don’t think it takes away from the image. It kinda makes me think of some management type game. Like a Settlers of the World type game.)

@davidrevoy awww, this is beautiful! Thank you for helping to reconnect!
@davidrevoy And that’s precisely why I self-host. If I didn’t, at any given moment I could lose a big chunk of my feed out of the decision of a single moderator!
@davidrevoy well, it certainly brought that issue to *my* attention!