Your periodic reminder that VC-funded CEOs are in a situation that they have bet both their kidneys on being able to deliver a 100x return to the bone-saw wielding loan sharks who funded them.

Your “community” is worthless to them unless it delivers Kidney Money.

They cannot just “decide” to not enshittify the community you mistakenly believed was yours. No appeal to justice or fairness will work, unless accompanied by a donor kidney or two.

@Unixbigot unrelated, but I find it interesting how “bone saw” has entered the lexicon recently
@jpm it makes me very sad to think of the murderous event that brought it to notoriety, but given where Dilbert Stark borrowed his money, I do hope he hears the motors every time he closes his eyes.
@Unixbigot the best part is that they didn't want a couple of kidneys, they wanted a couple MILLION kidneys so you can't just cut them a check or give them yours and go frolick, you gotta convince a lot of other people to give them theirs, too @tonyarnold
@brandonscript @Unixbigot @tonyarnold "and we have done so much good for the world because capitalism!"

@brandonscript @Unixbigot @tonyarnold

“Real magic can never be made by offering up someone else’s liver. You must tear out your own, and not expect to get it back. The true witches know that.”

- Peter Beagle, "The Last Unicorn"

@Unixbigot the whole system is broken.
@Unixbigot @mos_8502 And yet, they still deserve the wrath of their users.

@Unixbigot @cstross

Let's not forget that the muskrat is in a totally different situation, however. He has PLENTY o' money to pay off the loansharks. He's enshittifying the birdsite just for funsies.

I still argue that it's performance art: he's providing an object lesson to people about why you shouldn't let important things get purchased and run by billionaires and he spent $44B to show how much he meant it.

And a bunch of people *still* haven't gotten the point.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross
To be clear, (he spent if I recall correctly) $15 billion to turn Twitter into a shrine to his trollish nature, not $45 billion.

The purchase included ~$15 billion in new bank loans to Twitter, and other investors (the Saudis, Jack Dorsey, some others) agreed to hold on to their share of Twitter instead of forcing him to buy them out (and the inflated price his contract required him to pay).

@warren__terra @Unixbigot @cstross

I think the sale price was $44B and you're assuming it will still have some value when he's done.

He's worth something like $200B. It was more convenient to put some of it on a credit card, but he's good for it.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross
No, it's already probably near zero net value (it was worth maybe $15-25 billion when he bought it, and as part of the purchase he had it borrow $15 billion from banks, and even if he hadn't tanked its advertising sales and damaged its brand there's been a tech slump since then).

But he put in about $15 billion of his own money, he didn't have to pay the full $45 billion.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross
The rest of the $45 billion purchase price isn't his responsibility; 1/3 of it is on the banks, who inexplicably loaned that $15B to Twitter (not to Elon), and 1/3 of the owners decided to hold on to their share, not sell to him.

Though, the $15 billion is his cash outlay. As Charlie points out, his antics at Twitter have reduced Tesla's stock price and hurt his net worth, by a lot.

Also he's likely to subsidize Twitter's losses rather than admit defeat.

@warren__terra @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot It cost him a lot more than $15Bn if you follow the TSLA stock price over that time period: it's dropped from a high of 395 to as low as 108, and only recovered to 260 recently. So it's cost TSLA 23% of $816Bn market cap, or nearly $190Bn, of which Musk owns a large proportion (in addition to that $15Bn sticker price he paid for Twaddle).
@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot You may be right, but I don't think he's self-aware enough to be doing it deliberately. I think it's just play money to him and he's throwing a tantrum instead of a normal midlife crisis. ($44Bn was more than his total worth prior to 2019. Past $1Bn no amount of money makes any significant difference to your lifestyle: there's nothing it can buy that you can't lease for less anyway, and it won't save you from dying in the end.)

@cstross @Unixbigot

You may well be right. If it *is* a performance, he's not broken character yet.

OK. I'm being somewhat tongue-in-cheek. But I still think that's the lesson that we should take away from the experience.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Money can buy lots of things (and some things aren't for sale at any price). The takeaway I'm getting most clearly from Dilbert Stark (and the Tangerine Shitgibbon) is that it buys freedom from consequences; and some people react to this by demonstrating that they never had any self-restraint or ethical sensibilities whatsoever.

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot
Lack of consequences also means fewer opportunities for learning

When he made a hash of running PayPal/X, they put him in an advisory position, probably positioned as a promotion; not really useful feedback for improvement

@sabik @cstross @Unixbigot

Whose learning?

@stevendbrewer @cstross @Unixbigot
Yeah, the people around may learn; not the person insulated from the consequences

@sabik @cstross @Unixbigot

I'm less concerned about the muskrat and more concerned about the rest of us: if WE will learn, we can take steps, collectively, to rein in the power of rogue billionaires and make the world a safer place. But people are incredibly resistant to learning that when they believe profit can be made by aligning themselves with the face-eating leopards.

@stevendbrewer @sabik @Unixbigot rein in, not reign in!

@cstross @sabik @Unixbigot

It's sometimes hard to tell the difference.

@stevendbrewer @sabik @Unixbigot Eh? Horses have reins to control them: Monarchs who reign are *in* control. Shouldn't be hard!

@cstross @sabik @Unixbigot

But is it a reign of terror, or does terror come raining down upon you?

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Thank you for introducing me to the name “Dilbert Stark”  
@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot I think he genuinely thought he was a brilliant businessman, and he’s getting increasingly frustrated that reality isn’t cooperating.

@KimSJ @cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Oddly no - I think Trump *knows* he's just a grifter, but he's *very good* at it.

Musk is what happens when you start to believe your own myths. He's far from brilliant. He's just been lucky to be rich enough to be able to afford to try stuff that most of us couldn't, and not be bothered if most of it doesn't work.

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot The stories about him are so weird. he went to twitter after he took it over and apparently talked a long time about alien civilizations. Quite nuts. Last century we had a failed painter, now a failed science fiction writer.

@Soyweiser @cstross @Unixbigot

I always thought McConnell was a tortoise -- not a painted turtle. 😉

(typos are always funny)

@Soyweiser @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot He's not a failed science fiction writer (take it from a successful one—I'd know!) … he's an Extropian. And that's much, much, worse.

I mean, that's a great philosophical basis for writing SF, but as a pragmatic tool for managing the here-and-now it's potentially as efficient as Stalinism at building pyramids of skulls. (Only, on Mars.)

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Yes, I was joking (I don't think he is that deep), iirc he has ever expressed any desire to write science fiction. Unrelated Musk is an odd Extropian as iirc he has personally expressed that he doesn't wish to extend his own life. (he could just been talking out of his ass however, he does that a lot. Just as when he claimed he could solve the unfriendly AGI problem by just implementing rules that forced it to be friendly (Yud wept))
@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Him being an extropian does fit with his weird remarks about entropy. I wondered why he had such a weird obsession with talking about that.
@stevendbrewer
@Unixbigot @cstross
He's using his absurd wealth in a personal vendetta against trans people. All of this started when Grimes left him for a trans women (Chelsea Manning), right around the same time that his trans kid told him to fuck off forever via the court system. He's mad and this is how he hurts his perceived enemies, all while pretending he's some invulnerable, feelingless memelord.
@GrayGooGirl @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Yup. There's transphobia layered on top of white supremacism in the mix. (I speculate it's been gathering pace ever since he realized that no matter how hard he pushes SpaceX to build him a city on Mars, he's going to be too old by the time it's ready to go with them to his white settler paradise on the Red Planet. So he's stuck here in the mud and flames of climate change and doomed to eventually die like the rest of us. Lolsob.)
@GrayGooGirl @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Actually, let me amend that: transphobia (and homophobia) are emergent symptoms of the misogynistic patriarchal world-view that gave us imperialism and capitalism. It's a hairball of ick, and individual carriers of the pathogen exhibit each symptom to a different extent.
@cstross
@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot
I just get tired of the framing that the transphobia is a byproduct of the right-wing politics, when it's pretty clearly at the forefront of Musk's motivation. Twitter had one of the largest and most active trans communities on the internet, and his policies (the ones he personally insisted upon) have made it nearly impossible for us to be there without a sustained deluge of hate. The only major change to moderation policy was levied at trans people.
@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross It was amusing when the cybersecurity community realized that 'being bought by a crazy rich person' is a threat vector they had not thought about.

@Soyweiser @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross

Seriously? Do these people not read/write science fiction since, like, forever, or even at least seen a James Bond movie?!

@stevenradecki @Soyweiser @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross In science fiction, people (eventually) listen to the scientists. That's the "fiction" part, I think.

@stevenradecki @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross In cybersecurity, taking movie plot threats as real is very much frowned upon. As it leads to crazy unrealistic reactions to imagined threats which make real security harder.

For example see the movie plot contest: https://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/04/announcing_movi.html

related: https://xkcd.com/538/

@Soyweiser @stevenradecki @Unixbigot @cstross

As I was getting run out of technical work (because the the leadership of the University would rather outsource everything than maintain their own skilled workforce) I was pleased to see the notion of "convergent security" finally getting bandied about: Cybersecurity isn't just its own, separate thing: it needs to be integrated into all of the security practices of the institution, including physical, legal, financial, etc.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross He doesn't own all of that as money, he has loads of shares and trying to sell $15b of Tesla and SpaceX shares at one would reduce the price suddenly and significantly.

Instead he can pay them as shares but they do go up and down, and I'd expect him to pay way more than that in actual Tesla shares - they're going down faster than his rockets.

@hittitezombie @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot That's a bad analogy; his rockets (with one very visible—and experimental—exception) generally don't crash: in fact, they just racked up the all-time record for longest run of successful launches since 1958.

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Sorry, I'm not a writer and can't claim I'm that good at analogies.

What about like the chance of an endangered species living near one of his launchpads retaining the hearing capability?

@hittitezombie @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Almost all of SpaceX's rockets are launched from Kennedy Space Centre or Vandenburgh AFB—which were launching rockets for 60 years before SpaceX existed. (I don't think they should be continuing Starship test flights from Boca Chica, but there's a Starship pad under construction at KSC and Boca Chica is too limited, so I expect they'll move in due course.)
@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross
This sounds like the 'Trump is playing 5D chess' defense. Why attribute to performance art what can be attributed to spite? Seems to me that he was annoyed that a bunch of 'woke' people were able to organize, protest, hold politicians and wealthy accountable. His actions have all reflected that motivation too.

@smitten @Unixbigot @cstross

Call it whatever you like: being charitable, wishful thinking, unreasonable optimism… I just wish people would take the opportunity to learn the lesson and begin to empower themselves rather than giving into despair and cynicism.

@smitten
@Unixbigot @cstross @stevendbrewer
The real issue is that we live in a system where the two are functionally identical.
@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross Musk’s destruction of Twitter is just Part 1, though. Remember that one of social media’s greatest values is its organizing power. M is chasing away the libs (after harvesting their personal data and scraping all the comments for AI purposes). He’s already started Part 2, attracting the maximum of very bad actors to the fashosphere so he can use THEM for his own (and MB-S’) purposes. The predation never ends. Capitalism! Whatchagonna do?

@MPgh @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross I argue that M is considering twitter his command&control platform in the vision of getting independent from nation states (which basically means he’s a rogue oligarch trying to get from nation states to plutocracy)

Remember when he disabled starlink for Ukraine forces who made too much progress into Russian terrain—even though those were paid for by the US government, Ukraine and others? And seemed to stop after getting stern looks by the US government?

@MPgh also keep in mind that Musk is a Science Fiction fan. Do you know the sheer number of SF stories where a rich genius saves humanity by breaking out of the rules of the worlds nations?

I think that that’s where Musk comes from and where he wants to get to.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross

@ArneBab @MPgh @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Oddly, as an SF author myself (and a few years older than Dilbert Stark) I am familiar with the same genre cliches he grew up with. I'm also mature enough to recognize the difference between puerile adolescent wish-fulfillment fantasy and the real world …

@cstross … and like me you’re no billionaire who could really realize those wishes — and "bless" humanity with the fallout …

In the stories playing with extremists "because you’re the one who recognizes the pact out of necessity while the others are too frightened to do what’s required" usually ends well, because the genius can reign them in.

In reality …

Anyway: that’s what I’m worried about with Musk.
@MPgh @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot

@ArneBab @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot @cstross Great point! He probably fancies himself a modern Howard Rourke from that vile book “The Fountainhead”, too. Malignant narcissism, soaked in buttloads of money.

@stevendbrewer
I disagree; Phony Stark doesn’t have plenty of money. He has what, for the sake of brevity, I will call wealth; ownership shares in several large ventures. He’d have liquidate¹ most of that to replace that pile of cash to which he set fire.

¹ which is essentially impossible. The “value” of a majority stake in Twitter/SpaceX/Amazon/Facebook etc evaporates if you try to sell it in a fire sale.

@cstross