Your periodic reminder that VC-funded CEOs are in a situation that they have bet both their kidneys on being able to deliver a 100x return to the bone-saw wielding loan sharks who funded them.

Your “community” is worthless to them unless it delivers Kidney Money.

They cannot just “decide” to not enshittify the community you mistakenly believed was yours. No appeal to justice or fairness will work, unless accompanied by a donor kidney or two.

@Unixbigot @cstross

Let's not forget that the muskrat is in a totally different situation, however. He has PLENTY o' money to pay off the loansharks. He's enshittifying the birdsite just for funsies.

I still argue that it's performance art: he's providing an object lesson to people about why you shouldn't let important things get purchased and run by billionaires and he spent $44B to show how much he meant it.

And a bunch of people *still* haven't gotten the point.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot You may be right, but I don't think he's self-aware enough to be doing it deliberately. I think it's just play money to him and he's throwing a tantrum instead of a normal midlife crisis. ($44Bn was more than his total worth prior to 2019. Past $1Bn no amount of money makes any significant difference to your lifestyle: there's nothing it can buy that you can't lease for less anyway, and it won't save you from dying in the end.)

@cstross @Unixbigot

You may well be right. If it *is* a performance, he's not broken character yet.

OK. I'm being somewhat tongue-in-cheek. But I still think that's the lesson that we should take away from the experience.

@stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Money can buy lots of things (and some things aren't for sale at any price). The takeaway I'm getting most clearly from Dilbert Stark (and the Tangerine Shitgibbon) is that it buys freedom from consequences; and some people react to this by demonstrating that they never had any self-restraint or ethical sensibilities whatsoever.

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot
Lack of consequences also means fewer opportunities for learning

When he made a hash of running PayPal/X, they put him in an advisory position, probably positioned as a promotion; not really useful feedback for improvement

@sabik @cstross @Unixbigot

Whose learning?

@stevendbrewer @cstross @Unixbigot
Yeah, the people around may learn; not the person insulated from the consequences

@sabik @cstross @Unixbigot

I'm less concerned about the muskrat and more concerned about the rest of us: if WE will learn, we can take steps, collectively, to rein in the power of rogue billionaires and make the world a safer place. But people are incredibly resistant to learning that when they believe profit can be made by aligning themselves with the face-eating leopards.

@stevendbrewer @sabik @Unixbigot rein in, not reign in!

@cstross @sabik @Unixbigot

It's sometimes hard to tell the difference.

@stevendbrewer @sabik @Unixbigot Eh? Horses have reins to control them: Monarchs who reign are *in* control. Shouldn't be hard!

@cstross @sabik @Unixbigot

But is it a reign of terror, or does terror come raining down upon you?

@cstross @stevendbrewer @Unixbigot Thank you for introducing me to the name “Dilbert Stark”