Whenever someone tells you that the climate crisis is a personal responsibility issue, show them this:

https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/2017/jul/10/100-fossil-fuel-companies-investors-responsible-71-global-emissions-cdp-study-climate-change

The climate crisis is a billionaires crisis, a trillion-dollar corporations crisis, a capitalism crisis, a systemic inequality crisis.

#climateChange #climateCrisis #climateCatastrophe #climate #corporatocracy #capitalism

Just 100 companies responsible for 71% of global emissions, study says

A relatively small number of fossil fuel producers and their investors could hold the key to tackling climate change

The Guardian

@aral

The crisis we are responsible for is accepting capitalist accumulation and taking the benefits from it all without requiring politicians to keep wealthy classes and forces in check. That has reached crisis level because we were manipulated, and are still being manipulated to accept it, rather than rising up and making the fundamental changes that will keep humans and ecosystems alive into the future.

@aral Agreed. But just so folks watching at home don’t feel completely helpless, can you also post actions that you see as valuable? Political organizing? Competing products/services to support instead?
@rcbo @aral most important thing is political organising and protesting. Your personal consumer choices aren't likely to have much impact. Green party in the UK for example is almost entirely volunteer driven and always needs more help. Just a few extra hand campaigning in an area can swing an election, especially local politics.

@Sammurraysutton @rcbo @aral I've had a very hard time with the Greens here in the UK. They opposed nuclear, and Lucas was especially loony with her Guardian op-ed about how men can't be trusted to lead. It was... alienating to say the least.

With Corbyn ousted though, I'm now struggling to find a party worth voting for. Can you sell me on the Greens?

@Sammurraysutton @rcbo @aral if your household income is above about US$100k/year, your spending choices are probably as important as your political choices - maybe even more so.
@rcbo @aral Smash capitalism! Disown companies! Eat the rich!
@rcbo @aral
Sow the seeds for a communist takeover
@bwada @rcbo @aral democratic socialism yes, communism no :-)
@wall0159 @rcbo @aral
But in reality capitalism doesn't allow democratic socialism, so it's just a fantasy without power structures that explicitly represent proletariat interests first and foremost.

@bwada @rcbo @aral you're right, though I wouldn't put it that strongly -- there's definitely a tension between the wants of capital and the needs of workers.

But that tension also exists in communism, because you end up with a new elite that can't be democratically removed, and they act as gate-keepers to the capital.

I think that it should be *possible* to have a social democracy that redistributes wealth to those who need it -- and there are societies that come close (eg. Scandinavia) -- granted, their economies are subsidised both by fossil fuels and exploited foreign labour. I think, that if the middle-classes in those countries could be pursuaded to settle for a life of scarcer material goods, and better social connections, then they could reduce their exploitative nature and become a close approximation of social democracy. To me, that seems more likely than a communist system with elites that don't exploit their power

@wall0159 @bwada @rcbo @aral it doesn't matter which point you stick your political pole at because the histrionics of the dominant actors will always polarise and magnify the importance of their delusion.

@rood @wall0159 @rcbo @aral

There's no shortage of histrionics and delusions for sure. But rather than frame things by that, we can look at increasing awareness of how power operates, with the goal of implementing structures for the wider good. Avoiding wars, reducing environmental destruction etc etc. Basic stuff.

@wall0159 @rcbo @aral

Whatever the system is called, i think it would have to explicitly take on the unaccountable power of the military industrial complex, massive corporations and links with deep state. The notion of that happening through tweaks under capitalism is fanciful I fear.

@aral because OF COURSE 100 companies are responsible for 71% of all this. It's ALWAYS the companies. Great piece.
@aral That may be so. We in the, so called, developed world must to take some responsibility.
@aral
I joined a recycling program oddly, didn't save the world...
I reinsulated my house - didn't save the world...
I changed my lightbulbs - didn't save the world...
Changed my van for a Mini - didn't...
Got a heat pump...didn't.
These were distractions from the scale of the changes needed.
Govt is meant to restrain the powerful for the common good...
Those bastards need some powerful restrainin'!
Boycott!
Strike!
Vote!
We all need to do bigger things!

@aral Can I remind everyone here of the need to set up a #Nuremberg process for the authors of the #ClimateGenocide ?

https://www.journeyman.cc/blog/posts-output/2023-05-22-Climate-Change-as-Crime/

Climate Change as Crime

Is consciously contributing to climate change tantamount to genocide? I think it is.

The Fool on the Hill

@aral

Its a capitalism crisis, unlimited growth and ditto profit is unsustainable… the model needs change.

@aral

"Whenever someone tells you that the climate crisis is a personal responsibility issue, show them this:"

And are you not enabling those 100 companies by directly or indirectly buying their products?

Those companies are not causing the climate crisis by burning their fossil fuels on their own, you know.

@aral The climate crisis is Tragedy of the Commons on a global scale.

"If an individual acts in their best interest, it can result in harmful over-consumption to the detriment of all. This phenomenon may result in under-investment and total depletion of a shared resource. "

@aral

That global footprint bullshit was just to hoodwink that we, as individuals, were as guilty as Shell and BP.

@Geri @aral and to delay action and responsibility for as long as profitably possible

@natureworks @aral

That #Petronas advert with "see you in Energy Asia" seriously does my head in.

@Geri @aral I wonder how the lies and deceit will play out. Will there be a watershed moment? Or will the denials continue as the flames reach the very doors of the citadel?
@aral
Very true. But that doesn't take away from the fact that personal action can be an act of political resistance. Especially if you organize and get other people to take personal action. Not flying for holidays, not owning a car, eating plants instead of animals, getting solar panels etc. are still all meaningful actions that are helpful.
@aral both those things are true - while it is a billionaires crisis, it is also a personal responsibility crisis - those companies are delivering good and services mostly to the billion or so people in the global middle class (income eg. US$20000-300000 annually). As long as we pay them, they'll continue to do it

@wall0159 @aral this is the truth. We as individuals can’t call out oil companies for their CO2 emissions while buying fuel from them to fill up a 3 tonne truck.

Our personal responsibility is to opt out of consumerism as much as possible AND push to stop these corporations.

@aral Basically, Fortune 500 is our hit list, how convenient.
@aral In other words, the personal responsibility of the plutocrats who caused it to happen....
@aral
But but but Aral! If it is not a personal responsibility issue, 21st
century puritans would be deprived of a reason to feel smug and self-righteous.
Can't have that, now can we?

Nota beni: I at times fall into the smug and self-righteous trap myself.

@aral thank you so much for including the link! Most people don't, which gives the mistaken impression that those 100 petroleum producers actually consume the fossil fuels.

The article shows that the fossil fuel industry is wildly concentrated. Economically this is terrible, but it gives activist investors an opportunity to put pressure on a relatively small number of companies.

Many of the top producers and refiners are state-owned, however, and don't have shareholders to be responsible to.

@aral also, the idea that because most oil is produced by just 100 companies, individual action doesn't matter, is really mistaken.

Please don't spread that misinformation! Fossil fuel companies want you to get climate depressed, and intentionally spread gloom and doom to discourage action.

Individual action matters a lot. I wrote a blog post about it here:

https://evanp.me/2021/10/07/what-individual-action-does-for-the-climate-emergency/

Vote, protest, boycott, donate. Everything we do moves the world closer to keeping under 1.5C.

What Individual Action Does For The Climate Emergency

One of the most problematic misconceptions about the climate emergency is that individual action doesn’t matter. Sometimes it’s paired with another myth, that 71% of emissions are cause…

Evan Prodromou's Blog
@evan @aral coordinated action, collective action, is what works. Otherwise it's ashes and sackcloth.
@aral … until 2022 guardian called this “Sustainable Business”… now they call it “Climate Crisis”… at last.

@aral Yes, though it’s not one or the other - all interlinked. beheviour change can impact policy, and we hwve sonlittle time that we cannot wait for policy to curb corporations, we need #EverythingEverywhereAllAtOnce.

We should also distinguish, some people have much higher personal responsibility than others. Those in public eye who don’t change high carbon lifestyles suggest all is fine to millions of others.

@aral Every mile you do with your ICE car, every trip you make in a plane, every 38°C shower you have, every time you warm your house, you are part of the equation.

Those big COs are producing the energy *you* burn. You can blame them, but you are just deflecting your responsibility.

@aral It *is* a personal responsibility issue... It's the personal responsibility of those people who are billionaires ... No matter how small I make my "carbon footprint" even "everyone who makes less than 10 times what I do" we couldn't make a big enough change to *really* make a difference.
@aral Sadly people have woken up and mobilised themselves and then came the #green #capitalism parties ( Ex: German greens ) which hardly bother about real issues affecting the environment.

@aral What companies produce those emissions is less relevant than the output, with the real question being if it can be replaced with greener energy.

If fossil fuels are feeding and heating 8 billion people, then shaming the top X companies involved is akin to shaming people for existing and for creating the demand.

I find it disingenuous when people don't talk about the elephant in the room.

@aral

It would be useful to have a 2023 version of this table. The position since 2015 may have changed a lot.

@SWLABR For the better? I highly doubt it. But yes, it would be nice to have.
@aral
Is there any other economic system other than capitalism in existence? I know the PRC has the CCP, but we all know they're not communists. The world has many Socialist parties, but I would be hard-pressed to name one Socialist economy. I read we've reprogressed to a stage of techno-capitalist-feudalism, which Marx never could have imagined. Is the future inherently difficult or simply impossible to predict?
@aral I would love to see updated data since this story is from six years ago, but the point remains that the rich are destroying the planet and blaming us for it. I would hazard a guess that the disparity is every greater nowadays. #EatTheRich
@aral yes it's constantly presented as a personal or consumer choice as if climate change could be solved by the shopping and recycling habits of 8.5bn people most of whom don't have valid choices even if they had agency.