@dangillmor @mmasnick I know it makes me finicky, but:
1) boilerplate EULA terms
2) minimal moderation capability
3) no block feature, then rushed out block feature
Suggest to me that Bluesky really is ill-prepared to run a social network. They're going down the usual techbro path of putting 45% effort into engineering, 45% effort into looking cool for a handful of investors, 10% effort into solving known difficult problems of products like theirs.
@skotchygut @dangillmor @maxkennerly they WANT to let people out. They have said all along that their ultimate focus is on the protocol. Bluesky, the service, is just supposed to be a reference example to test the protocol.
There's a chicken and egg problem in developing federation AND other features (remember, Mastodon implemented blocks 7 months after launching).
This is why Mastodon has *not* launched. They know what they need.
@mmasnick @skotchygut @dangillmor @maxkennerly
Last line supposed to say *Bluesky I think?
I guess I'm inherently more skeptical of corporate entities. They can say they're planning it all the want but it doesn't mean much to me until they do it. I wouldn't have recommended Mastodon to anyone when it didn't have blocks, I wouldn't recommend BlueSky to anyone when it doesn't have federation.